Certainly. I suppose we can even say something like an interaction informational faculty. Say thinking is like some hyperdimensional vextor, and how one thinks determines its trajectory, or perhaps even, state of being.
-
Members of the previous forum can retrieve their temporary password here, (login and check your PM).
DMT-Nexus forum
Physics131
Interesting.
Can we then say that thinking could be a bidirectional interface between what is and what can be?
Can we then say that thinking could be a bidirectional interface between what is and what can be?
Voidmatrix
I wouldn't delimit it to a number. 
what is, what can be, what ought to be, what isn't, what is and isn't, what might be, etc etc etc, along with opting to seems instead of is.
what is, what can be, what ought to be, what isn't, what is and isn't, what might be, etc etc etc, along with opting to seems instead of is.
Does "thinking" in this aspect mean something instrumental that can be used like a mechanism?
And that, depending on the context, something different is achieved?