The only rule I've found to be universally and objectively "true" is the one that states "the only constant in life is change," which is also quite a cool paradox. And I find it to be objectively true because the only way you can stop change is to stop time itself, which is, for all intents and purposes, little more than science fiction.
-
Members of the previous forum can retrieve their temporary password here, (login and check your PM).
DMT-Nexus forum
Nydex
Voidmatrix
Is that a rule or law, or is it more of an observation?
Aristotle talked about this in terms of the prime mover; that which moves but remains unmoved itself. So change is in a certain sense unchanging, but must change in order to change what it's changed and in that way is unchanged.
There are times in hyperspace I've been in zones where there's no time, but plenty of change. Makes succession weird.
One love
Is that a rule or law, or is it more of an observation?
Aristotle talked about this in terms of the prime mover; that which moves but remains unmoved itself. So change is in a certain sense unchanging, but must change in order to change what it's changed and in that way is unchanged.
There are times in hyperspace I've been in zones where there's no time, but plenty of change. Makes succession weird.
One love
MAGMA17
I think that’s also because as humans we can’t have that broader view that can grant a better understanding. The universe is immense/infinite and we are so small with such a slow elaboration of information (at least in this reality)
Nydex
Indeed, perhaps change is not bound to time as I reducibly stated. Yet, if you detach the metaphysical aspect of the notion of change from itself and isolate only the idea of it, then it's hard to imagine a state of being which is not permeated by constant change, no matter the scale. Even a still particle frozen at absolute zero in vacuum is not stationary from the perspective of the space and/or time it inhabits.
Voidmatrix
Could we not say that the metaphysical aspect is part and parcel an aspect of the noumena of change and so can't be divorced from the idea of change, ie, is the metaphysical component not included in the idea?
Nydex
It is, but if it can be detached, at some point it will be. I'm definitely streching the idea thin though, so take it all with a grain of ever-changing salt 
🌺🔥🫧
Speaking of laws xD
A book I would like to check out!
www.rosicrucian.org
A book I would like to check out!
Spiritual Laws by Dr. Lonnie C. Edwards
God has created spiritual laws which govern humanity and the universe. However, being co-creators with God, the quality of our thoughts, beliefs, and intentions will determine and manifest our world. This is your guide to put these concepts into practice in our troubled world today!
www.rosicrucian.org
Physics131
"But I've yet to meet a paradox I didn't like"
@Voidmatrix I am very curious which paradox that is.
@Voidmatrix I am very curious which paradox that is.
Voidmatrix
@Physics131 I haven't come across one yet 
Physics131
Oh now I got it 
Physics131
Wait is this already a paradox?
Voidmatrix
A nice recursive self reference 
Nydex
The essence of the sacred fractal permeates all layers of reality. 
Physics131
When a paradox would have a smell then I would maybe be able to smell something.
Voidmatrix
An olfactory paradox would be hard to share I hazard.