Cacti I have grown from seed, Any good ones here?

[Cyaphide]

The san pedro is not a san pedro in my opinion. Yours has distinctive "bumpy" areoles, which the san pedro doesn't.

Btw, nice IR background.

 

[Adivino]

I don't know if it's active or not (its name), but if I had to bet, I'd say no.
The peyote looks like a peyote to me.

 

[Bezerker]

The "unknown" looks like a "Cereus Peruvianus" and is inactive.
The "San Pedro" looks like a hybrid of "Trichocereus Bridgesii" or "Achuma", which in my experience is one of the most active.

I recommend cutting about 12" off your cactus, make some syrup and give it a whirl.:lol:

 

[۩]

That is not a true peyote. I forget the name of this species but I am 100% sure it's not lophora w.

 

[dg]

That is not a true peyote. I forget the name of this species but I am 100% sure it's not lophora w.

hard to say at that age, look for pink flowers when it matures

 

[AlbertKLloyd]

Thanks, Does it look like any active cacti in your opinion, this worries me because I got those seeds from a very reputable seller.

In my opinion it does not look like an active plant, but looks like a sun starved cuzcoensis type. However without having seen it grown in brighter conditions it cannot be identified by me.

The peyote looks very cute.