Ott pointed out in his book on ayahuasca analogs that ayahuasca is a pan gaean or gaian entheogen. Because there are so many plants that can be used to make it, from all over the world.
No granted many of these plants are not really suitable to just drink as a straight up tea, and some of these plants require extraction... which here we all know so well. It is through the alchemical arts practiced by so many here that ayahuasca becomes Pan Gaean, or an entheogenic complex that can be found or created from plants around the world.
If one is extracting them any way... is there a greater advantage to changa over having to make full extracts of harmalas too with some plants to make a pharmahuasca as well as the tryptamines?
It feels like it is... but I have not been able to accurately articulate it yet. It feels like changa makes it more possible for others... perhaps due to the lack of nausea the majority of the time.
Im not sure... but I would like to talk about it!
Any thoughts?
No granted many of these plants are not really suitable to just drink as a straight up tea, and some of these plants require extraction... which here we all know so well. It is through the alchemical arts practiced by so many here that ayahuasca becomes Pan Gaean, or an entheogenic complex that can be found or created from plants around the world.
If one is extracting them any way... is there a greater advantage to changa over having to make full extracts of harmalas too with some plants to make a pharmahuasca as well as the tryptamines?
It feels like it is... but I have not been able to accurately articulate it yet. It feels like changa makes it more possible for others... perhaps due to the lack of nausea the majority of the time.
Im not sure... but I would like to talk about it!
Any thoughts?