much like the wiki, or as a seperate part of the wiki we could have a space for research.
I brought up this possibility when chatting with new member anne (and someone else, im sorry for being bad with names). how cool would it be if we knew not only what works, but also what doesnt work, or what has already been tested.
the "Projects" part of the wiki could have lists of things that would be good ideas for research or testing, users could add information and check off things that have been done with relevant information and hypothesis for others that excperiment next.
Personally i think it would be great to know which acacia species have been tested with TLC (when are the kits coming?
) it could be an evolving space for collaborative research with quick relavent notes on a sidebar, with expanded conclusions in the main body of text.
There would be a list of different areas to get involved with making reasearch much easier for everyone, with more data being collected and submitted it could be very easy to get involved. the only real concern is inaccuracy but with moderation and perhaps people taking a keen interest in 'heading' particular areas (which they themselves have an interest in) we could have a clear, concise whiteboard for corroborating information on a wide variety of things.
I brought up this possibility when chatting with new member anne (and someone else, im sorry for being bad with names). how cool would it be if we knew not only what works, but also what doesnt work, or what has already been tested.
the "Projects" part of the wiki could have lists of things that would be good ideas for research or testing, users could add information and check off things that have been done with relevant information and hypothesis for others that excperiment next.
Personally i think it would be great to know which acacia species have been tested with TLC (when are the kits coming?
) it could be an evolving space for collaborative research with quick relavent notes on a sidebar, with expanded conclusions in the main body of text. There would be a list of different areas to get involved with making reasearch much easier for everyone, with more data being collected and submitted it could be very easy to get involved. the only real concern is inaccuracy but with moderation and perhaps people taking a keen interest in 'heading' particular areas (which they themselves have an interest in) we could have a clear, concise whiteboard for corroborating information on a wide variety of things.

, but it's coming, really. First it was budget issue since I couldnt get an investor, then I finally did, and now that this is settled, we just decided to, before releasing the kits, build a big database with high quality videos of colorimetric reagent reactions and chromatography information on the different substances so that people can more easily identify what they see in their test plates. I hope I dont have to eat my words but I'd estimate early next year this all should be released to the public... Again, sorry for the delay, it's been already over 2 years of work and I want to get this out there more than anyone really lol..