I'm yet to experience DMT, but am on the way to extracting it from mimosa hostillis bark. I came to this forum mostly seeking to research it's effects and extraction techniques, and was surprised to find that many of the DMT using community feel that DMT is not merely a hallucinogen but a means to communicate with beings normally unseen to us. I don't rule out the idea of this and am trying not to be a cynic. It's certainly possible that what we observe from day to day is not the full picture - the hypothesis shown in the matrix, for example, or the explanation of the world we live in as believed by various religions could very well be true and there is no way of disproving these things. However they are still unlikely. It's fairly accepted that various chemicals like LSD, and psilocin cause users to [i:2943b69ef8]hallucinate[/i:2943b69ef8] - users sence of depth perception and colour will be distorted. These are not real perceptions - the wall is not in fact breathing and the tie die pattern is not changing colour. These perceptions could in fact be true and not in the mind, but this is unlikely and it is accepted that they are not real. DMT is another hallucinogen and is chemically similar to psilocin - but many people explain the intricate and detailed hallucinations of DMT as not of the mind but from another world. This is a possible hypothesis, but it's much less likely as it, unlike the hallucination hypothesis - conflicts with observations of the world while not under the influence of DMT (such as science) So why have people chosen to blindly accept this explanation when it seems less likely than the conventional explanation?