Doodazzle
Rising Star
To begin exploring this question, let's consider two approaches. Ceremonial magick and sigil magick.
The ceremonial approach generally involves props, lighting, incense, a mood. A scene is set.
The sigil approach, pioneered by A.O. Spare and developed further within the Chaos current is generally simpler and more to the point. One composes a statement of intent, creates a symbolic representation of this intent, focusses on this symbol whilst pushing oneself into a state of gnosis, a cathartic or trance state, inwhich the intention is supossedly cast out into the universe, in the hopes that it can manifest.
To me, it's always seemed that so called magick is all about tricking the subconscious mind into affecting the world in ways that the normal conscious mind can not directly comprehend...this is about using latent psychic powers. One might suggest that "magick" occurs all the time, spontaneously, accidentally perhaps. Things just fall into place...
One way of looking at magick is that all magickal practices can be filed unto either Enchantment or Divination. The world is a system of Dynamic Order, which can likewise be referred to as Chaos. Like a cloud. A swirling fractal proccess. To Divine, one makes their mind like unto one of these systems, like a cloud, like wind tossed leaves, turbulent waters, ect. Cast the stones, swirl the tea leaves, shuffle the tarot, split open the steaming entrails....study the random configurations these dynamic systems lay out for you and intuit the answer to your query.
Enchantment can be scene as being much similiar. One uses whatever tools/slight of mind/ritual, whatever, and sets out to affect a chaotic system, to nudge the chaos in a certain direction. Peter Caroll has suggested that one should enchant long and divine short. To divine a far away event, well, there's a lot of chaos between now and far away, theres so much that could change. For enchantment however, if one enchants long, there is plenty of chaos (opportunity) that one's intent can make usage of on the way.
I do not profess to "know" anything and I certainly do not claim that any of this is "true"...idk, every so often a new thread pops up, "hey what do you think of magick"? I thought I'd get a bit more specific with this thread, see what other think about this one proposed theory of the mechanism of magick. If there is actual interest, then maybe we can go further and explore other questions. (moral implications seems a big one, I hate to see anyone led astray in this dangerous territory) Entheogenic usage the world over is largely the province of Shamans. To me, it only makes sense that we explore these subjects. I thought I'd start very basic.
Any thoughts? Or ought I shush and keep it to myself?
The ceremonial approach generally involves props, lighting, incense, a mood. A scene is set.
The sigil approach, pioneered by A.O. Spare and developed further within the Chaos current is generally simpler and more to the point. One composes a statement of intent, creates a symbolic representation of this intent, focusses on this symbol whilst pushing oneself into a state of gnosis, a cathartic or trance state, inwhich the intention is supossedly cast out into the universe, in the hopes that it can manifest.
To me, it's always seemed that so called magick is all about tricking the subconscious mind into affecting the world in ways that the normal conscious mind can not directly comprehend...this is about using latent psychic powers. One might suggest that "magick" occurs all the time, spontaneously, accidentally perhaps. Things just fall into place...
One way of looking at magick is that all magickal practices can be filed unto either Enchantment or Divination. The world is a system of Dynamic Order, which can likewise be referred to as Chaos. Like a cloud. A swirling fractal proccess. To Divine, one makes their mind like unto one of these systems, like a cloud, like wind tossed leaves, turbulent waters, ect. Cast the stones, swirl the tea leaves, shuffle the tarot, split open the steaming entrails....study the random configurations these dynamic systems lay out for you and intuit the answer to your query.
Enchantment can be scene as being much similiar. One uses whatever tools/slight of mind/ritual, whatever, and sets out to affect a chaotic system, to nudge the chaos in a certain direction. Peter Caroll has suggested that one should enchant long and divine short. To divine a far away event, well, there's a lot of chaos between now and far away, theres so much that could change. For enchantment however, if one enchants long, there is plenty of chaos (opportunity) that one's intent can make usage of on the way.
I do not profess to "know" anything and I certainly do not claim that any of this is "true"...idk, every so often a new thread pops up, "hey what do you think of magick"? I thought I'd get a bit more specific with this thread, see what other think about this one proposed theory of the mechanism of magick. If there is actual interest, then maybe we can go further and explore other questions. (moral implications seems a big one, I hate to see anyone led astray in this dangerous territory) Entheogenic usage the world over is largely the province of Shamans. To me, it only makes sense that we explore these subjects. I thought I'd start very basic.
Any thoughts? Or ought I shush and keep it to myself?