• Members of the previous forum can retrieve their temporary password here, (login and check your PM).

Legal Freedom Essay/A New Beginning

Migrated topic.

Oligarchy

Rising Star
Come one, come all. Welcome to the new, hopefully clean legal thread.
It seems I was banished from the chat room for reasons I'm still trying to grasp.
So here is the knowledge I was planning on unveiling on the chat room, but I suppose here is a better place, as it is response free as of present.
One minute I'm trying to explain Common Law and Admiralty Law and the next thing I know, windows are disappearing and I've been apparently banished lol.

But anyways, I digress, and I'm not going to give up on you all just yet.
So, here we have it, Lesson One:

Common Law in conjunction with treasonous governments means we do not have to pay their taxes, obey and consent to their traffic laws, their legal system, their monetary system, and their whole fraudulent, deceptive and evil game. I URGE you to keep reading with an open mind. This is true and our right!

STRAWMEN NAME
A strawmen name is a form of title placed upon your country at the time it was bankrupted by the FRB (Federal Reserve Bank and/or Central Bank)
As collateral the bank requested that all citizens in sed country are placed under Capitis Diminutio Maxima status.

IMPORTANT EXPLANATION: Capitis Diminutio Maxima (Name in ALL CAPITALS)

For purposes of understanding one's legal or commercial status under the Admiralty system (the law system used in England, Canada and much of the US), it is necessary to examine the curious use of all CAPS -Capitis Diminutio Maxima- in legal and domestic income tax forms, credit cards & statements, loans, mortgages, speeding & parking tickets, car documents, road tax, court summons etc. While seemingly a small concern by face value, this apparent small detail has extremely deep significance for all of us!

Gage Canadian Dictionary 1983 Sec. 4 defines Capitalize adj. as "To take advantage of - To use to ones own advantage."

Blacks Law Dictionary – Revised 4th Edition 1968, provides a more comprehensive definition as follows …
Capitis Diminutio (meaning the diminishing of status through the use of capitalization) In Roman law. A diminishing or abridgment of personality; a loss or curtailment of a man's status or aggregate of legal attributes and qualifications.

Capitis Diminutio Minima (meaning a minimum loss of status through the use of capitalization, e.g. John Doe) - The lowest or least comprehensive degree of loss of status. This occurred where a man's family relations alone were changed. It happened upon the arrogation [pride] of a person who had been his own master, (sui juris,) [of his own right, not under any legal disability] or upon the emancipation of one who had been under the patria potestas. [Parental authority] It left the rights of liberty and citizenship unaltered.

Capitis Diminutio Media (meaning a medium loss of status through the use of capitalization, e.g. John DOE) - A lessor or medium loss of status. This occurred where a man loses his rights of citizenship, but without losing his liberty. It carried away also the family rights.

Capitis Diminutio Maxima (meaning a maximum loss of status through the use of capitalization, e.g. JOHN DOE or DOE JOHN) - The highest or most comprehensive loss of status. This occurred when a man's condition was changed from one of freedom to one of bondage, when he became a slave. It swept away with it all rights of citizenship and all family rights.

Diminutio. Lat. In civil law. Diminution; a taking away; loss or depravation.

Capite. - Lat. By the head.

As Black's Law Dictionary explains, the full capitalization of the letters of one's natural name, results in a diminishing or complete loss of legal or citizenship status, wherein one actually becomes a slave or an item of inventory. The method, by which the State causes a natural person to "volunteer" himself into slavery, is through forming legal joinder, implied or stated, with the entity or legal fiction (name all CAPS). Of course, most natural persons wouldn't willingly form such an unlawful but legally reductionist joinder, so trickery and obfuscation are used; and this starts when our birth certificates are created.

Due to the UK, Canada and the US being bankrupt countries, yes all these countries have been bankrupt for some time now; they all have currencies that are known as FIAT currency. In other words, all our money is worthless! There is no big Gold or Silver reserves to back it up…look on any UK banknote and you will see the words, I promise to pay the bearer. It is a promissory note…nothing more. Pretty much worthless!

So when we are registered at birth, the government produces a corporation, a straw-man, by placing our name in all capitals. But why I hear you ask? Well as we are a bankrupt country (just waiting to go into an economic fold – exactly what is about to happen in the US) the government needs collateral to invest and to receive loans on, so we, the people, become slaves in bondage to be used as collateral with lenders.

Don't make the mistake of thinking that still doesn’t apply! Do not make the mistake of taking advice from anyone who studies, or has studied orthodox law, as they especially will not know this…they were kept well away from this deliberately. Police do NOT know that us and them are slaves in bondage, solicitors & lawyers do NOT know that them and us are slaves in bondage, and most government agents do NOT know either.

But the great thing is we don’t have to be. It's as easy as being knowledgeable, aware and then just politely declining their offered contract!

The following is a form you can/should send to the CEO of the company that is requesting payment from a credit card and/or are threatening foreclosure:

Its imperative that I also mention the method on how to get to this point however.
If they keep troubling you by phone with various threats… such as foreclosure, simply write to the CEO using Recorded Post with something very similar to the example below.

Oh, and if you're still worried about threats of Bailiffs, feel free to ask how to reject court hearings.
So here it is, the almost God-Like Form, and its explanation below.

****************************************

CEO (WHATEVER) BANK
Full Address of their Head Office

Date:

Sent Recorded Post

NOTICE REGARDING ACCOUNT # (whatever the number is)

Dear Sir or Madam:

I would be happy to settle any financial obligation I might lawfully owe as soon as I have received the following documents from you.

1. Validation of the actual debt (the actual accounting).
2. Verification of your claim against me (a sworn affidavit or a hand signed invoice)
3. A copy of the contract signed by both parties and therefore binding both parties.

I hereby give you fourteen (14) days to reply to this notice with a notice sent using recorded post, and signed by the CEO under their full commercial liability and penalties of perjury, assuring and promising me that all of the replies and details given to the above requests are true and without deception, fraud or mischief.

Yours truly,

By: _Elijah S Olig__(ELIJAH OLIG)_Date: ____________

****************************************

In the world of law and commerce, get used to autographing and using (agent) in brackets after your autograph. This is because you are an agent for NAME in ALL CAPITALS, and the NAME is NOT you! It's merely the AGENT you've represented since birth, thanks to our country going bankrupt.

Now then, thanks to this nice little form, the banks cannot validate/prove the debt because they never sustained a loss and a debt never existed. If any of you have watched Zeitgeist you would understand that CREDIT is merely created out of thin air. So they cannot verify any claim against you because you are not the NAME they are billing. They cannot produce a copy of the contract because one doesn’t exist; all that exists is an unenforceable unilateral contract, or what the banks refer to as ‘your contract with us’ and this is not a valid bilateral agreement, since the four requirements of a lawful, binding contract were not met on the credit card application. These are as follows:

1. Full disclosure (we're not told that we're creating the credit with our signature).

2. Equal consideration (they bring nothing to the table, hence they have nothing to lose).

3. Lawful terms and conditions (they're based upon fraud).

4. Signatures of the Parties/Meeting of the Minds (corporations cannot sign because they have no right, or mind, to contract as they're nothing but legal fictions).

END OF LESSON ONE!!!
Hopefully some of you made it to this sentence...

Now... Does anyone have anything constructive to say?
Or is it just more "this kid doesn't know what he's on about!" bollox.
COME ON PEOPLE!!!

Questions would be appreciated and advised, because if you're anything like myself was a year ago, 60% of the above information will seem like complete and utter nonsense. But re-read it, over, and over. And I promise you won't be disappointing.

Yet again, even though I took a pretty big blow from you all before,
Our's Faithfully,
Elijah Solomon Olig, not ELIJAH SOLOMON OLIG...
 
My friend, I was simply stating in an easily understandable 'First Lesson', that payment of CREDIT Loans are unnecessary, as well as mortgages.
As I said, fire away about anything you don't understand. I'm here to help.
And welcome to the nexus brother, the road to enlightenment is paved with beautiful occurences...
This website, and this information are fine examples.
 
Back
Top Bottom