To play devils advocate for a second or 3, I wouldn't assume that it "must take a more complicated form" nor that the reason for the complexity is based 'outside' of yourself

Also, i think you're views on "2 infinity's" are evidently based in dualism.  An infinity is an infinity. An objective 'thing'. if there are 2, these two must reside in a third, but in total there is still just 1 no matter how many times the unified state extends in to multiplicity.

What i'm coming to learn lately, is that it's easier to complicate things than it is to simplify them. Something we are all 'guilty' of yet it's a paradox we live within. To undersand anything, we have to express an idea and tie together words and concepts but the more words and concepts we use, the more fragmented and self replicating the 'map' becomes.And that's all it ever is, A map, and not the terrain it's self. Yet the map makers are equally as part of the terrain being mapped