-
Members of the previous forum can retrieve their temporary password here, (login and check your PM).
Marko Rodin's vortex based mathematics
- Thread starter jamie
- Start date
Laban Shrewsbury III
Rising Star
Awesome. It all makes sense now.
Citta
Skepdick
This guy is just namedropping a bunch of concepts, there is nothing there, it's nearly impossible to understand what he is really talking about. No credible sources mentions this guy, and the stuff is discussed at David Icke's forum - which discredits it even further imo. I can say with a high degree of certainty that this is just bullshit.
He talks about something so hopeless as the similarity between "8" and the symbol for infinity, and that because of this there is some link between them. Total nonsense. The symbol for "8" has not even been the same throughout the history of mathematics, and that we use the symbol "8" now is totally arbitrary. Other symbols used now is VIII, ٨, ፰, ৮, 八, 捌, ८, ௮, ח, ៨, 팔 and ๘, which doesn't resemble "∞" much at all. The symbol for infinity is also arbitrary, and stems from the fact that it was convenient to turn "8" 90 degrees when the art of print came about.
All of this is supposed to be a "Unified field theory" that is supposed to give us, because of unknown reasons, infinite energy, infinite food and what not. It is rather strange then, that he and/or they haven't produced any reliable examples of this.
Again with matters like these, show some criticism
He talks about something so hopeless as the similarity between "8" and the symbol for infinity, and that because of this there is some link between them. Total nonsense. The symbol for "8" has not even been the same throughout the history of mathematics, and that we use the symbol "8" now is totally arbitrary. Other symbols used now is VIII, ٨, ፰, ৮, 八, 捌, ८, ௮, ח, ៨, 팔 and ๘, which doesn't resemble "∞" much at all. The symbol for infinity is also arbitrary, and stems from the fact that it was convenient to turn "8" 90 degrees when the art of print came about.
All of this is supposed to be a "Unified field theory" that is supposed to give us, because of unknown reasons, infinite energy, infinite food and what not. It is rather strange then, that he and/or they haven't produced any reliable examples of this.
Again with matters like these, show some criticism