SpireCatalyst
Rising Star
Anybody else watchin?
SpireCatalyst said:
SpireCatalyst said:
archaic_architect said:I was listening to NPR the other day and they were saying there is a private organization that plans to colonize Mars by 2022....This I gotta see, 10 years to colonize Mars? By a private organization? This would blow my mind.
endlessness said:Debby Downer says: I'd wish we'd take care of a few other problems down here before spending all this money to go to mars.
Message to Debby Downer:endlessness said:Debby Downer says: I'd wish we'd take care of a few other problems down here before spending all this money to go to mars.
In 1970, a Zambia-based nun named Sister Mary Jucunda wrote to Dr. Ernst Stuhlinger, then-associate director of science at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center, in response to his ongoing research into a piloted mission to Mars. Specifically, she asked how he could suggest spending billions of dollars on such a project at a time when so many children were starving on Earth.
Stuhlinger soon sent the following letter of explanation to Sister Jucunda, along with a copy of "Earthrise," the iconic photograph of Earth taken in 1968 by astronaut William Anders, from the Moon (also embedded in the transcript). His thoughtful reply was later published by NASA, and titled, "Why Explore Space?"
clouds said:endlessness said:Debby Downer says: I'd wish we'd take care of a few other problems down here before spending all this money to go to mars.
stupid quote
The Traveler said:Message to Debby Downer:endlessness said:Debby Downer says: I'd wish we'd take care of a few other problems down here before spending all this money to go to mars.
The technology developed for this will maybe some day make it possible to expand the human race to other worlds. So even if we make a mess of Earth, we have a better chance of overall survival.
Also, when money is important then the 2.5 billion that this research costs is nothing compared to say, developing a new airliner (about 12 billion), developing a new line of cars (about 1 billion per car) or something like the worldwide defense industry (about 1.5 trillion).
Do we really need a new jumbo airliner that is only 5% more efficient? Or another car that looks slightly better as the previous one? Or enough weapons to annihilate all humanity? Or shall we take care of a few other problems down here first before spending it on ...?
Kind regards,
The Traveler
endlessness said:Care to explain your view and contribute to the discussion?
clouds said:1. Scientific progress: A lot of theories are put to the test with these kind of projects. This means that NASA (and other teams) will learn from this experience and build better robots that will deliver even better results here or in Mars or another planet or moon.
clouds said:2. Inspiration: Many people around the globe are happy that humanity is able to land a robot on another planet, even poor people. And they are inspired to be better persons each day because they are realizing that what may seem impossible is possible with hard work and intelligence.
clouds said:3. Solid evidence: Humanity gets proof about the conditions of other planets and determines whether it is useful to keep on exploring that place or not for specific purposes. If they are searching for minerals, resources or even life, they will have solid data about that specific place on a specific time.
clouds said:4. World peace: Even if NASA executives say that this is a great achievement for USA, almost everyone with a brain knows that NASA is full of foreign talents as well. There are a lot of Indian, Asian and European people as well. This shows that no matter where you come from, you can help in the progress of the human understanding of the universe, and this is a good thing towards achieving world peace.
clouds said:5. Truth is beautiful: With these kind of successful projects, Science scores +1 and Religion 0. And it gets a lot clearer for people that Religion is nothing but bullshit and that Science gets shit done. People are aware that there are a lot of problems "down here", and now "down here" includes Mars too.