Pandora said:armin,
You will not like this answer, but I always encourage sticking with small scale extractions. And those who are scientifically versed here, such as benzyme, have said outright that small extractions give consistently higher yields.
There are other issues - like if on the small chance something goes terribly wrong and your extraction turns out to be unsalvageable then you aren't out all of your ingredients.
Also, Nexus frowns on bulk extractions. It hints at commerce, involves large amounts of explosive fuel and has the potential to both end your life as your know it and bring very bad press down on our beloved molecule.
Please stay safe, free and high.
Homo Trypens said:As someone who has done extractions ranging from 50g bark to nearly 500g bark, i can confirm the thing about smaller extractions yielding better. Or rather, it just always took a bunch of extra work to get my yield up when i went larger than 150g.
The reason is actually simple, based in geometry. Let's assume for a moment that you extract in a cube shaped flask. If you double the side length of your cube, you 8x the volume it can hold, but you only 4x the contact surface of the two solvents (water and naphtha). Therefore, pulls become less efficient.

fractals4life said:I wouldn't call anything over 1% "low quality", personally![]()
But yeah, in A/B teks you can reduce the acidified bark tea down to a more manageble volume, after the plant matter is filtered out, by simmering. You do several brews of the bark tea with new acid water every time so the water isn't very DMT saturated and will coax the DMT salts out of the plant. Then simmer down the several litres of tea to, say, 500ml then proceed to base and pull in a 1L container as per 50g amounts.
Don't throw out the bark until you're happy you got the lot out of it in the brews ( in practice this means trying your favorite method on 50g of the leftovers and seeing if you get anything significant, I suppose )
So, not much more effort, but you'll need some saucepans to simmer the tea down in.
Disclaimer ... I've not tried this yet, but read a lot![]()

fractals4life said:possible hitches:
If your bark is powdered it'll be a pain to filter!
I think over boiling can tend to coagulate tannins and trap DMT perhaps, I know the only time I tried A/B so far (150g) I got some nasty gelatinous sludge as well as the tea, and yields down somewhat, that was with fairly full on boiling though.
Good luck! The main hitch is the " all eggs in one basket" factor if you're using up the last of your bark.


To put things into perspective for you.. In Australia we are used to using plants that have 0.3-0.4% that often vary greatly depending on season/weather.. a plant with anything above 0.6% is seen as pretty high yielding and is very special!armin said:The quality of MHRB I can get is so bad that I get 0.8 gram DMT from 100 gram bark (tried many teks). So 500 gram only give 4 gram of spice. Really not much considering how many we are. And we wanted to make E-juice too. Which is not feasible with this yield![]()
acacian said:To put things into perspective for you.. In Australia we are used to using plants that have 0.3-0.4% that often vary greatly depending on season/weather.. a plant with anything above 0.6% is seen as pretty high yielding and is very special!armin said:The quality of MHRB I can get is so bad that I get 0.8 gram DMT from 100 gram bark (tried many teks). So 500 gram only give 4 gram of spice. Really not much considering how many we are. And we wanted to make E-juice too. Which is not feasible with this yield![]()
I'm perplexed how anyone could ever find 0.8% to be 'bad'.. when you remember there are about 25 high doses per gram of DMT. Multiply that by 4 and you have 100 breakthroughs. In what way is that disappointing? Its not my business what you do with your extract but if 100 high doses is disappointing I have to wonder what you are doing with it.
Remember that Mimosa is an insanely high yielding plant. It has set the bar REALLY high.. and the bark is already powdered for you and brought to your door. No travel, no learning to ID the plant, no harvesting, no drying and processing material .. its been grown, harvested and is ready to go - so most of the work is already done.. and it has 4 grams of very pure DMT in it ready to be extracted in a simple process. If the yield is a little lower then I wouldn't be too disappointed. That is still very little work for a lot of reward..
The mindset of it being a 'bad product' seems like its approaching it as a commodity .. it is a beautiful gift from nature. And it is a plant.. they vary..
Sorry but I had to say that.. not meant as an attack.. just a reminder that you are very lucky to have such a high yielding resource. And I think always good to remember what it came from..
good luck with your extraction/s![]()

acacian said:Of course. I can understand that when comparing it to other yields it seems disappointing.. but when you look at that yield for what it is, its actually really good.. my plant of choice here in oz is usually around 0.3-0.4%
As long as your yield is lower because of the plant and not your method of extraction then it shouldn't feel like a failure - as its out of your hands. If it is lower because of something in your technique.. then revision is in order
If you are thorough with any A/B, you should pretty much get everything out if you do enough pulls and mix for long enough. I'd personally avoid blindly following any recipe to the T and focus on understanding the theory behind the process. Then you can make your own decisions if something goes wrong .. plant chemistry fluctuates.. so I think to assume that extraction is static is a mistake. Sometimes adapting extraction accordingly is required. Experiment .. if you don't throw out your material then the DMT isn't going anywhere![]()