• Members of the previous forum can retrieve their temporary password here, (login and check your PM).

Reply to thread

[quote='Coatl]So 69ron is this right-


T. peruvianus - Mostly mescaline


T. pachanoi- Mixture of both


T. bridgesii- mostly other compounds


?


In general yes, but they do vary, so you will find some that don't follow that.


When you do an extract using this tech without the MEK cleanup at the end, you'll find that Peruvian Torch usually gives white crystals surrounded by amber impurities. San Pedro sometimes gives such results, but other times it's just one large mass of amber or brown sticky goo. Achuma seems to usually just be sticky goo. But after a MEK wash, they all produce the same off white mescaline acetate powder.


I would like to see more work done on Achuma’s non-mescaline alkaloids. The times SWIM extracted from it, he was very surprised at just how potent it was, and surprised at just how little mescaline it had.


SWIM has extensive experience now with the non-mescaline alkaloids of San Pedro but little experience with the same from Peruvian Torch and Achuma. Has anyone played around with the non-mescaline alkaloids of all three cacti and compared them after the mescaline was removed?

[/QUOTE]

Back
Top Bottom