Handel said:
But saying that UFOs and psychedelic experiences are related, could be seen as discrediting the actual ("consensus consciousness" ) reality of UFOs (if those things are actually highly advanced ships using technology we don't yet understand).
Strassman hypotheses that "alien abduction" experiences are just a psychedelic experience, which results from endogenous DMT release. If true, this would undermine a lot of people who claim they were actually, physically abducted, rather than having a hallucination.
This is exactly where your difficulty lies. It is EITHER or OR for you. They are either physical, or they're a hallucination, in your book. And that's a mistaken approach to see the phenomenon IMHO.
I'm not trying to say it
has to be either/or. Just that connecting them together requires additional assumptions (which may or may not be true)
My view is that we need evidence that they are all the same phenomena - beyond the psychological fact that all unknown topics (whether ghosts, UFOs, telepathy, etc) can produce a similar emotion in us.
It is useful to keep our ordinary distinction between real and imaginary phenomena. I might be tripping and imagine I can fly - but I will still fall when I jump out the window (as has happened to trippers in a number of famous cases, where they jump out of windows and are killed, while on psilocybin, LSD or Salvia).
At the same time, that doesn't mean the hallucinations about flying were not interesting (and that our visions of flight don't have some important neurological, psychological, spiritual basis).
The strongest question about UFOs, seems to be one of ordinary reality. Whether they are real phenomena in ordinary reality (supposedly being measurable on radar screens), and then (if intelligently piloted) whether they are flown from another planet.
On the other hand, it seems to me, the question about entities (experienced in trips), alien abduction, angels and demons, etc, is much more one of our psychology and religion (spirituality).
---
Now should we bundle these different things together and use one to explain the other? It is possible they are the same thing or connected?
One might posit a spirit world which can interact with the physical world, and then say that UFOs are a part of the spirit world.
But one has then added some extra assumptions to the ones UFOlogists already believe in (that UFOs exist).
1. Existence of something like a "spirit world" (or entities existing in a fourth dimension, etc).
2. Spirit world can interact physically with ordinary world not only through our minds.
3. UFOs are part of that spirit world.
Even if one accepted assumption 1 and 2 could be true, it's possible assumption 3 could be false (that it would be true, requires an additional assumption).
So while it's possibly true, it's adding more assumptions, which seems to reduce the theory's overall probability (that all the assumptions would be true).
Handel said:
You see, if you're a 4D creature, you can be BOTH. You can lower down in 3D if you must, and you can be in 4D if you choose to. And 4D comes with its own bag of physical laws, which DOES explain a lot of paranormal things like telepathy (sound has much difficulty to propagate in a 4-spatial dimensional reality, which could force beings to develop telepathy) and even appearings and disappearings (watch the numerous youtube videos explaining how a 3D being would look to a 2D being,
Thanks, I haven't studied this area of maths/geometry, and would indeed be interested. I need to restudy maths (not on this level though) to change my next degree course.
Handel said:
Or in countless DMT trips, beings making operations by removing things from inside our body without ever having to make a cutting! All these are well understood math/physics IF you add an additional spatial dimension into the equation. It explains pretty much all the "unexplainable" things. And when that explanation kicks in, suddenly, it's not so much "things we don't yet understand", but rather "things we haven't bothered adding to our research portfolio" -- the math exists! The book I mentioned above is your peak into it.
Personally, I believe alien abduction reports are more a psychological topic, than a physical topic (until there is more strong public evidence of people being physically abducted).
As for the connection to trip and dream experiences. It could be (and I just suggest this as another alternative) that the psychological experience which can sometimes occur during breakthrough drug-induced hallucinations (of entities doing some kind of operation with your body, while your are lying down), explains why some sober people within the same culture report alien abduction.
So, to take another example:
1. We know that after taking certain substances (e.g. meth, THC), we can sometimes induce intense paranoia experiences, where the user believes people are plotting against them, watching them, etc.
2. At the same time, we know some other people have intense paranoia without taking drugs (although it can associated with certain mental illnesses, while in other cases it can be very true - people really might be plotting against them in reality).
But is the commonality between the two experiences (drug-induced and sober) evidence that the paranoia itself is true in an ordinary literal sense (people are actually plotting against them, watching them, etc)?
Or is this evidence that there may be a common psychological basis underlying paranoia, and which can be induced chemically?
Handel said:
They would also show that the government has been lying and covering up the topic for years (so that would be the biggest political scandal in history).
The government has to lie about it. It was the right decision to cover it up from the get go. If humans were ready for THIS kind of interdimensional aliens (instead of regular ETs), then the aliens themselves would appear to us plainly. Again, the fact that they don't, says droves both about them, AND the actual reality of things being way more complicated than we think. Hint: when there's reincarnation mixed into all this, the government can't, and shouldn't, disclose anything.
I know my mom ain't ready for such truths. Or my dad. Or pretty much 99% of the people I know.
Wouldn't this be a return, or rephrasing, of our ancestral beliefs? This is why the Dalai Lama was so blasé about the question, when Mack asked him it.
Perhaps your parents will not accept those views. But your great-great-great grandparents, surely believed in them.
Historically we had a belief that demons, fairies, and all creatures of folklore, come into the physical world from another dimension, steal people away, possess people, etc.
It might even make it easier to explain recent history: Hitler certainly seems to have been demonically possessed.
I'm not sure this would be a government position however. I get an impression they are more interested in a possibility that there could be spaceships of unknown origin (and much higher technology than we have) entering the air-space they claim to be able to secure, with the most sensitive alleged sightings being reported near nuclear weapons sites.