• Members of the previous forum can retrieve their temporary password here, (login and check your PM).

Psychedelics review by Dr. Nichols

Migrated topic.

pitubo

dysfunctional word machine
Senior Member
OG Pioneer
A new article by Dr. David E. Nichols is out. It is a followup to his earlier 2004 article, titled: "Hallucinogens" (mentioned here).

A quote from the article:
Dr. Nichols said:
As I intend to show in this discussion, however, the idea that psychedelics may have useful properties is not at all farfetched, and very recent clinical studies have reinforced the belief by many that psychedelics are well worth studying from a number of different perspectives.

http://pharmrev.aspetjournals.org/content/68/2/264

Psychedelics
David E. Nichols
Pharmacological Reviews April 2016 vol. 68 no. 2 264-355
doi: 10.1124/pr.115.011478

Abstract:
Psychedelics (serotonergic hallucinogens) are powerful psychoactive substances that alter perception and mood and affect numerous cognitive processes. They are generally considered physiologically safe and do not lead to dependence or addiction. Their origin predates written history, and they were employed by early cultures in many sociocultural and ritual contexts. After the virtually contemporaneous discovery of (5R,8R)-(+)-lysergic acid-N,N-diethylamide (LSD)-25 and the identification of serotonin in the brain, early research focused intensively on the possibility that LSD and other psychedelics had a serotonergic basis for their action. Today there is a consensus that psychedelics are agonists or partial agonists at brain serotonin 5-hydroxytryptamine 2A receptors, with particular importance on those expressed on apical dendrites of neocortical pyramidal cells in layer V. Several useful rodent models have been developed over the years to help unravel the neurochemical correlates of serotonin 5-hydroxytryptamine 2A receptor activation in the brain, and a variety of imaging techniques have been employed to identify key brain areas that are directly affected by psychedelics. Recent and exciting developments in the field have occurred in clinical research, where several double-blind placebo-controlled phase 2 studies of psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy in patients with cancer-related psychosocial distress have demonstrated unprecedented positive relief of anxiety and depression. Two small pilot studies of psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy also have shown positive benefit in treating both alcohol and nicotine addiction. Recently, blood oxygen level–dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging and magnetoencephalography have been employed for in vivo brain imaging in humans after administration of a psychedelic, and results indicate that intravenously administered psilocybin and LSD produce decreases in oscillatory power in areas of the brain’s default mode network.
 

Attachments

  • nichols2016.pdf
    1.1 MB · Views: 0
This is great! Thank you.

I still find myself quoting Dr.Nichols 2004 research constantly, specially in regards to the physical safety of psychedelics, example below:

The primary health concerns about LSD use are related to psychological health rather than risk of physical damage to the body or brain. As senior LSD researcher Dr. David Nichols, Distinguished Chair of Pharmacology at Purdue University and head of one of the world's top LSD research labs, stated in his 2004 review article on hallucinogens, "There is no evidence that any of the hallucinogens, even the very powerful semisynthetic LSD, causes damage to any human body organ. [...] Hallucinogens do not cause life-threatening changes in cardiovascular, renal, or hepatic function because they have little or no affinity for the biological receptors and targets that mediate vital vegetative functions."1 Deaths resulting from the pharmacological effects of LSD are rare to non-existent.

Thank you again for posting some recent research.

For anybody who wants a review of Nichols past research, the videos below are amazing, they are also worked up in a sense where you don't need to be a pharmacology major or a chemist to understand them, which I kind of saw as a downside, I wish they were more advanced, but most will see this as an upside, as it aides the watchability of the videos and makes the content reasonable to ant viewer.

Classic Nichols lectures:

Psychedelic science

LSD neuroscience

-eg
 
Back
Top Bottom