Members of the previous forum can retrieve their temporary password here, (login and check your PM).

Reply to thread

Message

all this talk is in a vacuum.

Now let me point this out to you, this will surely fuck with your mind, as it does mine, and is what this is all about. Science says that light in a vacuum does not know how fast anything is traveling, to make it really simple...No matter the speed of an object, light will pass at the SOL, or near if you want to get technical. That is what science says, not what i think. So by science, there is no way possible for me to gain ground on traveling photons, they will always run from me at nSOL, even if i reach nSOL, light will still run from me at nSOL.

Which brings up another thought or question less important than the main one im asking(link to proof), what do they even base that off of, compaired to what? Meaining, Light will move past any object at nSOL in a vacuum despite speed of object. What if this object where another photon, light always moves away from light at the SOL? Or say the object has mass, to any atom or particle of mass, light will always travel past it at SOL? This all sounds like a retard writing theories, it sounds way off and not even possible. But again, lots of people thought that when it came out, yet converted to believeing that it is a fact, i want to see what they saw, because from this point of view all i can do is trust the answer is right, and sorry...but fuck that! If its been proved, where is the proof, if there is none science is a joke(or can be), put OBE's on the table and all the evidence in the world is needed for it to be worthy of considering, no one really knows of anything they have done to prove this feature of light?

<blockquote data-quote="Cheeto" data-source="post: 3402145" data-attributes="member: 1212">all this talk is in a vacuum.Now let me point this out to you, this will surely fuck with your mind, as it does mine, and is what this is all about. Science says that light in a vacuum does not know how fast anything is traveling, to make it really simple...No matter the speed of an object, light will pass at the SOL, or near if you want to get technical. That is what science says, not what i think. So by science, there is no way possible for me to gain ground on traveling photons, they will always run from me at nSOL, even if i reach nSOL, light will still run from me at nSOL.Which brings up another thought or question less important than the main one im asking(link to proof), what do they even base that off of, compaired to what? Meaining, Light will move past any object at nSOL in a vacuum despite speed of object. What if this object where another photon, light always moves away from light at the SOL? Or say the object has mass, to any atom or particle of mass, light will always travel past it at SOL? This all sounds like a retard writing theories, it sounds way off and not even possible. But again, lots of people thought that when it came out, yet converted to believeing that it is a fact, i want to see what they saw, because from this point of view all i can do is trust the answer is right, and sorry...but fuck that! If its been proved, where is the proof, if there is none science is a joke(or can be), put OBE&#039;s on the table and all the evidence in the world is needed for it to be worthy of considering, no one really knows of anything they have done to prove this feature of light?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Cheeto, post: 3402145, member: 1212"] all this talk is in a vacuum. Now let me point this out to you, this will surely fuck with your mind, as it does mine, and is what this is all about. Science says that light in a vacuum does not know how fast anything is traveling, to make it really simple...No matter the speed of an object, light will pass at the SOL, or near if you want to get technical. That is what science says, not what i think. So by science, there is no way possible for me to gain ground on traveling photons, they will always run from me at nSOL, even if i reach nSOL, light will still run from me at nSOL. Which brings up another thought or question less important than the main one im asking(link to proof), what do they even base that off of, compaired to what? Meaining, Light will move past any object at nSOL in a vacuum despite speed of object. What if this object where another photon, light always moves away from light at the SOL? Or say the object has mass, to any atom or particle of mass, light will always travel past it at SOL? This all sounds like a retard writing theories, it sounds way off and not even possible. But again, lots of people thought that when it came out, yet converted to believeing that it is a fact, i want to see what they saw, because from this point of view all i can do is trust the answer is right, and sorry...but fuck that! If its been proved, where is the proof, if there is none science is a joke(or can be), put OBE's on the table and all the evidence in the world is needed for it to be worthy of considering, no one really knows of anything they have done to prove this feature of light? [/QUOTE]