While extracting Banisteriopsis caapi vine in a large soxhlet apparatus using 95% ethanol acididifed with USP HCL, some observations were made. It was first thought that when the elute from the soxhlet chamber was clear or close to clear in color, the extraction would be complete. this was not true. remembering the caapi alkaloids all have a beautiful glow in the UV light, the soxhlet chamber was exposed to UV light and observed periodically. Surprisingly, even when the elute was clear the chamber glowed a brilliant green. this was after about 24 hours of extraction. extraction was continued. over 56 hours later the chamber was still glowing bright green, but it was observed that the top 20% of the chamber no longer glowed, indicating complete extraction of the alkaloids (at least from that region).
the boiling flask which had the extractions from many runs of biomass over the last couple weeks glowed a very bright blue color, with green drips falling into it. before the uv observation came to mind, the previous extractions were stopped early. the biomass set aside of course in case any alkaloids remained.... but they were thought to be mostly spent at the time although smelling strongly of "vanilla bean". (at least in this olfactory system).
anyway, what this boils down to.... the compounds which flouresce blue in the UV light are rinsed out first. at least when using acidic ethanol. this includes all the color and surely many inactive compounds from the biomass. What remains for several days worth of extraction flouresces bright green and in regular light appears as barely tinted clear liquid.
this green fraction is clearly one of several banisteriopsis caapi alkaloids, in quite a pure form one would guess. this compound can be easily seperated with intent to isolate the particular alkaloid the green color is associated with. here is a clip that was read from article regarding caapi and two similar plants which were assayed:
So it is clear from this study that the different compounds present in Banisteriopsis caapi each flouresce a unique color, green being the most unique and easily identifiable.
Also it is noteworthy that the practice of traditional ayahuasca brewing with water places emphasis on multiple boilings of the biomass to achieve complete extraction. this would make alot of sense seeing as how an extraction using acidic ethanol is not completed after more than 3 days! never would have imagined it requiring so much time as the rinsing is steady and constant. maybe after 4 or 5 days total it will be completed.
My question is this.......... Who knows which compound glows green? The above quoted article made no reference to color id of the compounds.
it would be interesting to seperate this compound, the green glowing compound in the clear liquid, which is the most tenacious of all the ayahuasca alkaloids, remaining after many days, probably left behind in most peoples aqueous brews unless they are *very* thorough... this compound obviously would effect the over tone of the experience so it is of interest to research to identify which compound this is and what possible effect it may have on the experience. to me, metaphysically, there is some significance to the tenacity of this single compound remaining after everything has been rinsed. by the way, after 3 days of constant rinsing the clear liquid glows BRIGHT green as does about 2/3 of the soxhlet chamber... how many people actually extract this compound when they are brewing? I would guess acidic water would have much less of a chance of accessing this compound then acidic ethanol. my point is this compound (at least partially) is probably left out of most brews. it would be interesting and quite easy to seperate and assay.
comments anyone?
i just noticed i put this in the wrong section of the forum maybe... oops. please move if need be.
the boiling flask which had the extractions from many runs of biomass over the last couple weeks glowed a very bright blue color, with green drips falling into it. before the uv observation came to mind, the previous extractions were stopped early. the biomass set aside of course in case any alkaloids remained.... but they were thought to be mostly spent at the time although smelling strongly of "vanilla bean". (at least in this olfactory system).
anyway, what this boils down to.... the compounds which flouresce blue in the UV light are rinsed out first. at least when using acidic ethanol. this includes all the color and surely many inactive compounds from the biomass. What remains for several days worth of extraction flouresces bright green and in regular light appears as barely tinted clear liquid.
this green fraction is clearly one of several banisteriopsis caapi alkaloids, in quite a pure form one would guess. this compound can be easily seperated with intent to isolate the particular alkaloid the green color is associated with. here is a clip that was read from article regarding caapi and two similar plants which were assayed:
A comparative study of the three extracts was performed using thin-layer chromatography. Prepared aluminum-backed plates coated with silica gel were used. A solvent solution of 100 parts water to 100 parts ethyl acetate to 200 parts methanol to 6 parts ammonia was used in all three TLCs. The separated compounds were then visualized under UV light, and with an ammonia reagent to detect the presence of organic compounds.
TLC analysis detected the presence of alkaloids in all three bark extracts. B. caapi revealed four compounds (pale blue fluorescence at Rf=0.16, medium blue at Rf=0.34, bright green at Rf=0.42, and orange at Rf=0.45). B. muricata revealed four compounds as well (purple fluorescence at Rf=0.07, pale green at Rf=0.20, bright green at Rf=0.42, and blue at Rf=0.50). TLC analysis of B. martiana revealed only one compound (purple fluorescence at Rf=0.7). Comparative analysis found one compound in common between B. muricata and B. caapi (bright green fluorescence at Rf=0.42), as well as a shared compound between B. martiana and B. muricata (purple fluorescence at Rf=0.7).
So it is clear from this study that the different compounds present in Banisteriopsis caapi each flouresce a unique color, green being the most unique and easily identifiable.
Also it is noteworthy that the practice of traditional ayahuasca brewing with water places emphasis on multiple boilings of the biomass to achieve complete extraction. this would make alot of sense seeing as how an extraction using acidic ethanol is not completed after more than 3 days! never would have imagined it requiring so much time as the rinsing is steady and constant. maybe after 4 or 5 days total it will be completed.
My question is this.......... Who knows which compound glows green? The above quoted article made no reference to color id of the compounds.
it would be interesting to seperate this compound, the green glowing compound in the clear liquid, which is the most tenacious of all the ayahuasca alkaloids, remaining after many days, probably left behind in most peoples aqueous brews unless they are *very* thorough... this compound obviously would effect the over tone of the experience so it is of interest to research to identify which compound this is and what possible effect it may have on the experience. to me, metaphysically, there is some significance to the tenacity of this single compound remaining after everything has been rinsed. by the way, after 3 days of constant rinsing the clear liquid glows BRIGHT green as does about 2/3 of the soxhlet chamber... how many people actually extract this compound when they are brewing? I would guess acidic water would have much less of a chance of accessing this compound then acidic ethanol. my point is this compound (at least partially) is probably left out of most brews. it would be interesting and quite easy to seperate and assay.
comments anyone?
i just noticed i put this in the wrong section of the forum maybe... oops. please move if need be.