Many of us have probably heard of the 'flyn-effect' wich means that the average iq's of each generation of children raises with 4 points every ten years.
But to me, it increasingly looks like this is not true for the general population.
It looks a lot to me, like there s a growing gap between income groups wich is not just financial, but also ideological and it manifests itself in many other ways as well.
I truly start to fear that there is a growing gap in general mental abilities, not just intellectual, but also in social abilities, psychological stability, etc, so basically the total ability's of the mind.
Mankind is not evolving nor de-evolving i fear, but both.
Part of humanity will become smarter, healthier, older, taller, more social, more stable, more spiritualy evolved and also wealthier.
While another segment of the worlds population will not join this development and would possibly even grow dumber, unhealthier, more unstable, etc.
And none of us would like to admit it, but this divide runs along the lines of income differences. Basically, the poor will not be the highest spiritually evolved of man, while the wealthier will be.
This basically has to do with the fact that childeren born in a wealthy environment are more stimulated to develop themselves mentally in the broadest sense and those of us, born in poor environments are more often confronted with crime and, less stimulated.
And most importantly, when your situation is very unfortunate, when you are suffering much, you are less likely to WANT to develop mentally, because a higher awareness will mean a higher awareness of your own misfortune and suffering.
This is why you see a weird paradox in all western nations: liberal intellectuals often treasure the ideology of the emancipation of the lower classes, while the lower classes more and more resist this very idea of THEIR OWN emancipation. They vote for politicians who idealize a gap between the have's and have-not's. They vote for those who want to diminish their possibility's to ever get out of poverty.
Joe the plumber votes republican, or UK independant party, FPÖ, vlaams belang, PVV, forza italia, partido popular, etc.
And solidarity between social classes is therefore diminishing. For some people 'intellectual' is a dirty word, while for others it is a compliment.
Am i seeing this wrong? is it possible there ever will be unity amongst people SOMEWHERE?
But to me, it increasingly looks like this is not true for the general population.
It looks a lot to me, like there s a growing gap between income groups wich is not just financial, but also ideological and it manifests itself in many other ways as well.
I truly start to fear that there is a growing gap in general mental abilities, not just intellectual, but also in social abilities, psychological stability, etc, so basically the total ability's of the mind.
Mankind is not evolving nor de-evolving i fear, but both.
Part of humanity will become smarter, healthier, older, taller, more social, more stable, more spiritualy evolved and also wealthier.
While another segment of the worlds population will not join this development and would possibly even grow dumber, unhealthier, more unstable, etc.
And none of us would like to admit it, but this divide runs along the lines of income differences. Basically, the poor will not be the highest spiritually evolved of man, while the wealthier will be.
This basically has to do with the fact that childeren born in a wealthy environment are more stimulated to develop themselves mentally in the broadest sense and those of us, born in poor environments are more often confronted with crime and, less stimulated.
And most importantly, when your situation is very unfortunate, when you are suffering much, you are less likely to WANT to develop mentally, because a higher awareness will mean a higher awareness of your own misfortune and suffering.
This is why you see a weird paradox in all western nations: liberal intellectuals often treasure the ideology of the emancipation of the lower classes, while the lower classes more and more resist this very idea of THEIR OWN emancipation. They vote for politicians who idealize a gap between the have's and have-not's. They vote for those who want to diminish their possibility's to ever get out of poverty.
Joe the plumber votes republican, or UK independant party, FPÖ, vlaams belang, PVV, forza italia, partido popular, etc.
And solidarity between social classes is therefore diminishing. For some people 'intellectual' is a dirty word, while for others it is a compliment.
Am i seeing this wrong? is it possible there ever will be unity amongst people SOMEWHERE?