• Members of the previous forum can retrieve their temporary password here, (login and check your PM).

Spice Quest V

Migrated topic.

TmC47

Nice guy
I've been with spice since 2008, starting 5 days before my mother (best in the world) passed away. It's been a journey which has had it's bears on the road, being suddenly pushed into MUCH responsibility because of that sad event, and spice has been my companion during it. As now most of the turmoil seems to come to a close, I thought it would be nice to give something back to the world of spice lovers. It's going to be an EXHAUSTIVE account of my latest (and, as you will see, possibly last) work with Jurema by me. Time to move on, bla bla...

I actually did not find any posting guidelines on the site which had sec to do with posting in general. All I could find was about spice and the attitude the Nexus takes on it. (Which goes goes to show why this place has always given me such a good vibe.) So, I've started a new thread and I'm replying 9 times to it; to make room for this Spice Quest in 9 parts.

I hope you're all still with me by the time it closes :p

It touches on virtually all of the extraction techniques, but FASA is the red line throughout it all so I figured it should go here. This sub-forum could use some spice up it's behind anyway: I love the FASA way of things!

I'll try to do a new chapter every other day. It's already been written, and all evidence has already left my house. :twisted: There are also plenty (12MP) pictures for the visually inclined, and aren't we all. You can even double them in size: RMB->View Picture->LMB(zoom)

After all is finished, I'll also post a PDF of the whole thing.

So Please: enjoy!

TmC47
 
Spice Quest V

Introduction

Of course I extract because I want spice for personal use. But the analyst in me just *has* to measure and document every step, every time. This time however, I have been especially thorough. These are the lab notes of the proceedings (I kicked the seven dwarves out, what a bunch of freeloaders they turned out to be). It’s also liberally sprinkled with humour, sorry about that. (Near the end I’m not so humorous anymore because I wanted to be done with it: it took me 3 months to do these experiments and write up this report!)

The recipe I’ll be using is STB from MHRB using xylene, with FASA-salting to get the spice out of the xylene (or, as you will see, 75% will be FASA’ed and 25% evap’ed). I would really love to use limonene, but I can’t buy it here at any reasonable price. It lists as between €100 and €170 per litre at different national (meaning Dutch) vendors. Dunno what’s up with that, but the fact is we don’t grow any oranges here. You could get limonene from orange-peels if you asked nicely, right?

This is a looooong read. If you’re up to it, I think it could be with your while. If you’re not, you’ll get irritated quarter way through for sure.

Goals
The preliminary goals of my extraction were:
1. to determine how many xylene pulls would be sufficient from a time invested/spice returned point of view
2. to determine the yields of 4 different ‘purification’ steps/procedures after the initial extraction:
a. total evaporated Jim-Jam Spice (JJS)
b. FASA -> freebase
c. FASA -> de-fat -> freebase
d. FASA -> Zn-reduction -> freebase
3. to assess appearance, handling and qualitative experience of these products.
4. To determine the qualitative and quantitative effects of purification by re-crystallization with n-heptane.
5. The last goal is to gather information, see what kind of conclusions can be made and what kind of questions will be raised. This should be the goal of any experiment, really.

I can already say that I did a total of 8 xylene pulls, pooled into 3 separate batches. Now, in the past my usual train of thought would lead me to have twelve (12!: 3 batches times 4 procedures) separate products. Luckily, I’ve since grown a bit more realistic (yeah, right), so I’ll now end up with:
a. three batches of JJS. I will have a benchmark as to the maximum total amount of extractable materials by all of the three pools of solvent, which will give me information on how many pulls would be the most reasonable to invest in, and furthermore give me a yield regarding the three subsequent procedures. I will keep these three products separate, to see if there is a qualitative difference in the three JimJam’s. (A1, A2, A3) After all, I don’t really know if all the different extractable materials in there have an equal tendency to migrate into the solvent. And seeing how, despite excellent work by this community, there is still debate on the identity or indeed the effects of yuremamine, skatole, kukosagine, carbolines, DMT-n-oxide or what have you and the lot, keeping them separate seems a prudent step to take. It’ll be a blast to ‘discover’ that later pulls will give a more psychedelic spice!
b. a batch of freebase spice that was all fumarates. I expect (read: hope) to end up with 90% of what is in the JJS. (B)
c. a batch of spice that is all n,n-DMT. I expect about 70% of what is in the JJS. (C)
d. a batch of spice that is all n,n-DMT, including converted from DMT-n-oxide. I expect about 80% of what is in the JJS. (D)
e. I will undoubtedly come up with a few more variables that I would like to tweak. So I estimate 2 more spices from these ad-hoc creative impulses.
f. Re-crystallize one or two or three different spices with n-heptane, or try recrystallising in multiple attempts.
All for a total of about 10 different products to assess. I have a busy time ahead :).

As you can see above, I like freebase spice. For smoking. If I get a nice result from this extraction I might dip my toes into extracting some harmala’s from Syrian Rue (Viva la Revolution!, current-affairs-joke), and take it from there. The idea of messing with my enzymatic system never really appealed to me, you see. Which is strange considering that I don’t seem to mind messing with my neuro-receptors? I’ll get back to you on that one some time.

Just about the only thing I can think of that is not covered whilst being within my abilities to do, is the cleaning up of the fumarate. I don’t really see the need because procedure C or D will already yield the cleanest possible freebase and it follows it will yield the cleanest possible fumarate. If I wanted to IV fumarates I’d make some from either batch. But I don’t, so I won’t. If I get a bumper-crop of crystals, I might re-fumarate some for long-term storage though…

It might also be fun to find out if re-crystallisation from heptane as opposed to re-x from naphtha is worth the extra cost. Heptane costs me about €30 per litre, naphtha only €5, you see. I might see some loss of yield in procedure C with heptane, I recon. In favour of a purer product. But let’s face it: there is a limit to the amount experimentation that is still fun to do. All of this will already take almost two months of work as it is, working for an hour or so per day. I will make that decision when the choice arrives…

I would love to work out the Kv of MHRB/DMT from this data, but I realize I can’t. Not unless I am lucky, or without risking to blow a good amount of spice on heavy experimentation. So I will have to guesstimate the most ideal number of pulls. Oh well…

You will notice in these notes that I give my various spices names… I don’t infer anything by this. I just name them to avoid confusion. For myself and for you, esteemed reader.

This is the second time I try my hands on working with FASA (first time I did not document it on the Nexus, and my notes are fragmented) and my second time with zinc (orig. thread: Zn-experiment lab notes. - Advanced/Enhanced chemistry - Welcome to the DMT-Nexus )

Note on separating funnels (or separatory funnels as they are also called sometimes): there are basically three kinds:
• the ones that are hanging-cone-shaped with a width-to-length ratio of about 2 or 3 to 1,
• the ones that are more 1:1 ratio reverse stubby-pear shaped with a very short appendix at the bottom,
• pear-shaped like above but with a proportionally very long tubular appendix.
I like the first one best. They give the analyst the possibility to swirl the solution inside and let it ‘crawl’ up the funnel, so to speak. This is tremendously helpful, especially with difficult separations. And get two: sized 1 or 0.5 litre and 100 or 50 ml. Note also that a 1 litre separating funnel holds a volume of about 1.5 litres; having a large head-space is needed applying the techniques associated with using a separating funnel because it needs to be shaken, not stirred.

Preparations
Preparations started on the 6th of January, 2012. Mimosa Hostilis Inner Root Bark (whole) was bought on the internet from Germany in Jan 2009. The material was stored in the dark and in the cool and was only opened three times during this 3-year period. It was never stored “air-tight”, but not exposed either. The strips snapped (but stayed attached) when bend too much, releasing a small cloud of fine powder. In other words, it was still “bone-dry”. I did not freeze it at any time.
It was cut up width-wise to 5 mm chunks using garden-pruning-scissors (secateurs?).
It was then briefly chopped up in a cheapo-blender. This kind of got the rough edges off; I doubt it had any function other than make the blender permanently purple (and the blades permanently dull). Why did I choose to do it? Because I could, and because I didn’t like that blender very much :thumb_dow .
The chunks were then ground up in an electric coffee grinder (newly bought, the type with a blunt rotor) two heaped table-spoons at a time, to a fine powder, some of it airborne. In between portions the dust inside the grinder was allowed to settle for a few minutes. No fibres longer than 1 cm were observed. It was not sieved afterwards. All of this took over a week to complete, taking it easy.
Thus 700 grams of MHRB powder-with-fibre was obtained. It had a bulk volume of about 1.5 litres (rough estimate). And yes, I do dig big cakey purple boogers.

All of the powered bark was transferred to a 5L HDPE canister which used to contain acetone.
I prepared 5 litres of 2M NaOH by adding tap water to 200 g of drain cleaner (99+% NaOH).

Note: I know… I couldn’t get p.a.-quality lye fast or cheap enough but I trust this brand for no other reason than the fact that I got perfect spice with it before. And about the adding water to lye: I’ve made in the course of my career batches of 20 litres 30% lye (that’s 6 kilos to dissolve guys) many times over in this way and I consider myself pretty good in judging this reaction. Sodium hydroxide doesn’t really dissolve all that well in cold water so I let the reaction-temperature rise to about 90 *C (which is about 20 below boiling) and keep adding water (from another 5 litres jug that was filled beforehand) as needed to keep it from actually boiling, until it all dissolves by itself. One can hear it starting to boil at the bottom where the concentration is highest. All in glassware, naturally. Preparing the lye-solution takes less than a minute this way. Afterward the solution (about 800ml of hot 12M, or 25%) was poured back into to that water-jug to produce 5 litres of 2M NaOH. I like it like this, but I don’t necessarily recommend it. I used tap water because I really don’t see the need to be so analytically clean at this stage. The Dutch municipal water supplies are of exceptional quality, internationally speaking, and is hardly chlorinated or fluorinated (not 100% sure about the fluorine though..). Further down the line I will use demineralised water.

Step 1 - extracting the bark (pull me up, put me down)
Materials used: 700g MHRB, 1.6 L xylene, 200 g NaOH, 150 g Na2SO4

I added 4.5 L of this solution to the MHRB-jug, mixed it up good (the powder tends to repel the liquid at first), and added 250 ml of racemate xylene. Shook the hell out of it for 30 minutes in total (spread over 3 hours; I’m no Popeye. Plus: I’m not afraid of emulsions with xylene). It was left to separate for 24 hours and then siphoned off using a glass pipette and rubber bulb into a half-litre glassware separating funnel (PFTE cock and stopper). This was repeated twice, and the extracts pooled. I used 200ml instead of 250 for pull 3. The polar-phase (about 100ml of water / lye / tannins / chunky bits) was drained and added back to the soup.

Note: on using plastics with NP solvents. I have seen xylene used from the same LDPE respirator flask (squeezy-type) for *15 years*! It never even became brittle, sticky or soft. The same goes for acetone. I am quite adamantly sure that using HDPE for xylene or acetone is safe from a contaminant and structural-integrity point-of-view. Whether it will migrate through the plastic and evaporate to some degree, is another matter. For hexane, petroleum ether and DCM, I use PFTE. For naphtha I use the flask it comes in (Coleman fuel, PETF). Remember, sep-funnels’ listed volumes do NOT include the large area of headspace required for the shaking that is often associated with using one of these pieces of glassware. This half-litre size is quite sufficient for my needs.
Because of all this shaking of the MHRB-soup, the volume of the soup changes quite a bit (bubbles) and the temperature variations over the days also account for some of this needing-more-room. I used the other (lye) jug (which used to contain fabric-softener, washed 15 times with hot and cold water) to transfer the soup back-and-forth to, in order to keep a small surface to siphon off from (that jug has a tapering mouth). I also added some more 2M NaOH as needed in order to keep this ‘ideal’ volume for both vessels. This kept about 5% of the soup in a non-extracting container at any one time, but because of the back-and-forth pouring, I know that the effect on yield is negligible.


The pooled extracts were dried, straight from the sep-funnel, using anhydrous Na2SO4 (about 25g) in a funnel, plugged with a tiny ball of cotton-wool, into a 1 litre round-bottom flask. Thus was obtained 457g of crystal-clear dark yellow(Pantone PMS 110) xylene, equalling a calculated 525ml. I designate this extract pool 1. 175 ml were not recovered, apparently: most of this should still be in the soup, some evaporated no doubt. I should also mention that my drying-setup holds 50 xylene-grams of dead space, equalling about 10% of the total xylene used. So it pays to wash it out with 5x10ml of fresh xylene. The speed of the xylene through the drying-medium is about 1 drop per second. Used Na2SO4 was discarded after being left to dry out completely (for environmental reasons).

Note: I like to use the Pantone Measuring Scale to convey the colour. I use this one: http://www.klasproducts.com/Pantone-Color-Chart-1.jpg I’ve seen the description ‘piss-yellow’ and I don’t know about you guys and gals but my urine can vary greatly in colour on a day to day basis.

The extraction was repeated using the exact same procedure (2 pulls of 250ml each, third pull 200 ml). I got 438g (503ml) of crystal-clear light yellow (Pantone PMS 106) xylene. I designate this extract pool 2. Again I ‘lost’ about the same percent amount.
I heated the soup in its container in a warm (60 *C) water bath. Much more darkish yellow (Pantone PMS 107) xylene was recovered after one day. I added 200ml more fresh xylene, shook for 10 minutes, and placed again in 60 *C water bath. More xylene (now light yellow, Pantone PMS 106 again) was recovered after two days. These two extracts were pooled and dried as before and yielded 171 g, or 195 ml. I designate this extract pool 3.
The final tally of extract is about 1200ml of xylene. I added about 1600ml in total. Something to remember when I dispose of the spend soup. I’ll keep it ‘till summer and let it evaporate all of its xylene before I clean my drains with it.

Conclusions
I can’t conclude much at this point. The proof is in the pudding, and I haven’t eaten it yet.

Procedure A – total evaporation
Of each of the three pools (1, 2, 3) I took 25% to set aside in three separate ‘dishes’ to evaporate. Takes a fortnight in +5 to -9 *C weather without a fan. There was some airflow around though.
I’ve been wondering long and hard about posting pictures. The ‘educational’ value of it is low, because every spice looks slightly different, and one’s own spice looks best anyways, right? So if you’re going to do it, it might as well be spice-porn. These are some pictures I shot in HDR (CHDK forever!). Although the absolute colours are not exactly as they are in real life, the colour differences are and the overall look is. They are made with flash, because without flash, even after HDR-processing, they looked far more off real life than with a flash. So now follow some ‘spiced-up dirty pictures’. About the appearance of this JimJam spice I can say that they are all dull grains, not shiny-sparkly crystals. I’ve pulled dulled-down spice before, but not as dull as this.


Pool 1
2z87tr6.jpg

2vnhuh4.jpg

came out nicely. At one point during the process of solvent-evaporating (day 3), dozens of
small, transparent crystals of about 1 mm2 would appear and from these ‘seed crystals’ the matted, as opposed to shiny, goodies solidified. It worked what could be described as a ‘mouldy’ look over it. When scraped to and fro with a razorblade over a period of 15 minutes, I could get it to be ‘not really sticky’, but not entirely dry either. I Don’t think that I’m going to ‘mould it into any shape’ as per one tek though. I do have one observation immediately… It smells of exotic flowers and DMT, but there is also the ‘vibe’ of fabric softener.. I do now realize that I did not wash my 5 litre fabric-softener jug with a detergent because I reasoned that fabric-softener is a detergent anyways… and that is where I’m probably wrong.. It is a cream that is scented with alkyl-acetates and what have you, along with oils that are probably also synthetic in nature. To add insult to injury, these oils probably leeched into the plastic as well. Next time: Do. Not. Use. These. Bottles. It can’t be much though; I’m liberally guessing some half gram of fragrant creams and oils (and then 25% thereof), but quite enough to spoil it from a taste’s point of view I recon. Maybe I will be proven wrong. I hope so anyway.
Whatever may come from it, it amounted to 2.92 g. which would put the maximum yield of spice-fumarates of the remainder of pool 1 at 2.92 x 3 (because 75% is left) = 8.76 + (8.76 x 0.24) (because of the molar ratio between DMT and fumaric acid) = 10.86 g maximum total weight of fumarates. Of course, this ratio can be skewed in real life because not all that adheres to fumaric acid has the same molar weight as DMT does. But hopefully close enough. 75/25% is probably a more workable ratio, but hey! I can be anal about, right? BTW: You’re looking at 5 cm (2”) Petri dishes here.

Pool 2
2qd0t3c.jpg

gathered to what looked like virtually nothing at all, and very oily at that too. I couldn’t observe at all at what point the dish’s sparse contents turned from xylene to oil. After two weeks I put the 15 cm glass Petri dish on the central heater (60 *C) for about an hour to make sure all solvent was gone. Besides, it was by now freezing outside and my shed is unheated so it had to be done like so. The oil was still ‘runny’ while warm. Scraping with a razorblade just pushed red-looking oil around. But soon the oil became milky and after about a minute more, I was left with a solid, clay-like substance that was more brown than the JJS obtained from pool 1. I know this solidifying was not just because of the cooling down, for inside of the dishes’ edge there was still some liquid oil left and it had totally cooled down by that point. It formed quite large lumps and I wilfully chopped it down to make sure no volatiles remained trapped. Still smelled of fabric-softener, though not as much as the JJS obtained from pool 1. But quite strong though… Whatever may come from it, it amounted to 0.95 g. In other words, three subsequent pulls yielded one third of the spice the first three pulls yielded. Still worthwhile IMHO. This would put the maximum yield of spice-fumarates of the remainder of pool 2 at 0.95 x 3 = 2.85 + (2.85 x 0.24) = 3.53 g maximum total weight of fumarates.

Pool 3
2i03i3p.jpg

was treated in the same way at the same time as pool 2. It also behaved and looked exactly the same and was also ‘runny’, even though everything had completely cooled down by this point. It also smelled the same, unfortunately. The only differences with pool 2 were the amount (lots less) and the colour (lots yellower). It amounted to 0.30 g. It is so fluffy! What I usually eyeball as 30 mg was barely 20! So these last extra efforts I took to get the last of the spice out of the soup yielded a third still of the previous pool… not really worthwhile anymore IMHO. Had I used the warm bucket method in the last two pulls of the previous pool (or indeed with *all* my pulls), I’d have a better return-to-effort ratio.
At any rate, the maximum yield of spice-fumarates of the remainder of pool 2 is at 0.30 x 3 = 0.90 + (0.90 x 0.24) = 1.12 g maximum total weight of fumarates.

Conclusions after evaporating
It all seems to go down in thirds: 3 g from pulls 1,2,3 ? 1 g from pulls 4,5,6 ? 0.3 g from pulls 7,8. Or 9:3:1. I am quite pleased with this linearity. It would mean (roughly speaking) I get 2/3 with pull 1, 2/3 of what’s left with pull 2 and 2/3 of what’s left still with pull 3: amounting to about 80-90% of the total. Pull 4 would reach 86-93%, pull 5 91-95% and pull 6 would reach 94-96% of the total. I would do 6 pulls before I reach what I would consider ‘scraps’. Using the warm bath method it all would shift one or two steps to the left, at pull 4 or 5. I’m inclined to say 5, to be on the safe side. Why, it seems I *do* have stumbled upon some kind of Kv (0.66), for my conditions at least. Nice!!!
 
Qualitative assessment of the JimJam spice (what’s that smell?)
This is all good and well, but I am also intrigued by the apparent differences in what gets pulled at these different stages. I like the looks of the third pool best but the amount retrieved, or rather the lack thereof, sort of disqualifies it from considering tuning the procedure to this pool. Qualitative testing is needed to see what is the cream of the crop, or the bees’ knees, or the cats’ whiskers. Or as the Dutch say: the salmons’ nose. The method of administering in all these qualitative reports is the route of smoking it. I use fine steel-turnings with spice melted into it, and a small glass hammer-style bubbler. I let the flame barely touch the spice at first and heat it up good while I suck hard with the last litre of air my lungs can take. Always 30 mg, clear in always one single toke. No music, with warm incandescent light at pleasant intensity. Alone in the house, in the spare bedroom.

v79ueb.jpg


Sorry, but I won’t buy a GVG. It looks and sounds awesome but it’s waaay overpriced and the mandatory $30 P&P *and* the risk of having to pay import tax… well, I’m not gonna pay €120 for an ounce of glass with an SiC-frit (diesel fuel in-line filter). Hell, I’ve bought art-marbles from the US that weigh at least 10 ten times as much for half that price and a quarter of that amount of P&P, and I am certain the artists spend a great deal more time at the flame making those unique marbles. Until that Canadian lampworker will make it available for a reasonable price here in Europe, it’s disqualified itself for me.

If photographs are subjective, then making trip-reports and drawing conclusions from them on this small scale is doubly so. Spice in humans is frivolous: one day you can feel hardly anything and the next day the same spice blows your mind. Smoking-technique seems to be a big factor contributing to this effect (hence the popularity of the GVG, which is apparently almost fool-proof). But, I’ve perfected my smoking technique rather well over the past three years (thanks to the Nexus!) and I am confident that it is no longer the greatest variable anymore. And to exclude any secondary effects because I smoke from JimJam to ever purer spice in the chronological order of the preparations, I intend to smoke the same spices in reverse order after I have finished with all of this; a “revisited”-cycle. If I’m up to it, that is…

Pool 1 JJS I am not a big consumer of spice; I blast off once or twice every three months at less than 50 mg per lift-off. And it has been a while since that last blast. But boy, did I enjoy this one.
Bodymind: I managed to keep my eyes open the entire time, sitting upright in the bed watching the whole room go LEGO-kaleidoscope on me. All the patterns were fractal-repeating patterns, and I loved watching them squirm on every surface visible. And every surface looked like dolphins’ skins. I could not get my eyes to focus on one spot for more than 5 seconds, after which my eyeballs completely re-settled themselves in my eye-sockets and found another point to focus on. Rinse. Repeat. What set this experience most apart from my other ones though, was the relative ease with which I could prevent the ‘choking’ reflex I always have on (smoked) DMT, because small air-bubbles in my saliva start to feel solid in my mouth while high. They would grow in number and size until my mouth feels so full these ‘gems’ or ‘BB-sized pebbles’ that they start to roll down my throat (or so it feels to me) and I get a choking, dry-heaving reflex. I swear: I can hear and feel them rattle against my teeth if I move my tongue. Very disconcerting. But NOT so this time. A simple swallowing did diminish the effects completely and my body was back at ease. I repeated this as necessary. Awesome feeling to be free of this nemesis that has haunted my trips for all but the first three I ever did. The come-down was also slower, more gentle. In the past I have often had the ‘shakes’, which I compared to a ‘cold-turkey’ kind of reaction. Not so this time: slowly came down, giving my body and mind time to adjust to the changing sensory landscape. Awesome. The only thing that I regret that was missing were the tears: I have cried many thick tears during the comedown before. Not so this time. It’s possible that the tears were also a physical reaction. Damn. I so loved my DM-tears for their sincerity. I also felt invigorated in the residue of the experience, whereas with pure DMT I would relax so much, even my sphincter would be on the verge of giving in to this relaxation. Man, if they find out about that in the darkrooms of Amsterdam…
Entities: They were there, lurking in the corners of my vision and occasionally popping a big-eyed face into view, but no shocking revelations. I guess this is due to the dose, which is rather mediocre, naturally. I am just *always* cautious. At the end of the trip, they tended to wave their tentacles in front of me from over the top of my head. I mentally waved back.
Taste/appearance: Ah! The big one (considering my stupidity). I did not find it harsh to the throat at all. Though the taste of fabric-softener was mostly drowned by the taste of spice, it was there in the after-taste. Bearable, but barely so. Darn! I hate myself for this one unwitting corner I cut… This JimJam spice looks weird to me, not at all like the STB from naphtha that I know so well. Since I have no previous experience to draw from, I don’t know how to judge it.
Verdict: Excellent effects, although a little bit on the bizarre side. Love everything about it. Felt like more than 30 mg, and considering that a part of the JJS is non-actives, I am very happy with this result. :)
Shame about the taste though… :(

Pool 2 JJS
Bodymind: Crackling clear lift-off. This felt just like pure DMT to me. The only difference being that visuals went faster, clearer and brighter and that the carrier-wave was louder and more piercing. Yet, I forgot when I didn’t hear it anymore, I was so engrossed in the action. I kept my eyes open for the first 75% of the journey, but when I closed them: WOW! Intensely colourful visuals. Especially the blue-tones. Must repeat with eyes closed from the start next time. Body felt like it does on pure DMT. I did cry at the end again (yay!), the gems in my mouth were more difficult to control (booh!) and the residual effects were a lot more relaxing than those of pool 1, but felt ‘stretched out’ like lava which slowly solidifies in cooling. (sorry, can’t be more descriptive than that, I’m afraid)
Entities: None. It was all pure techno. Maybe they hid in the cracks of reality, but they did not make themselves known to me.
Taste/appearance: Yuck! Too much of that synthetic floral smell from my mishap, especially in the after-taste. Like with pool 1 JJS, it doesn’t really hinder the blast-off or the journey, but in the residues it’s a pain in the butt, this taste. Does this make it a ‘butt-tasting spice’? It looks similar in consistency to pool 1 JJS, but slightly more beige. It looks fine to me.
Verdict: Totally different this time! I could swear this was exactly like pure DMT for me, except for the looks of the spice. And again it felt like a lot more than the 30 mg it was. But double shame about the taste again though…

Pool 3 JJS:
Bodymind: It came on normally, but then seemed to get stuck in a loop that was not very interesting. Colours were nice, purple/pink/mauve dominated. The visuals were pretty straightforward organic lines. Like watching a TRON light cycle race from above, that old-school ‘snake’ computer-game, or of those textiles made by the Shipibo Indians of the Peruvian Amazon. The residues however were so stoning, I had to force myself to start moving. I just didn’t want to move, wanted to stay in this state of bodily paralysis. And I hate that feeling.
Entities: I could make out figures in the light cycle patterns. Like those Mayan murals that always portray the living subjects from the side, in profile. But they were all static. There was promise, but in the end, it all remained inanimate.
Taste/appearance: It looks beautiful! Like yellow DMT, except it is dull and more ochre. The moment you handle it though, you know it isn’t like your normal STB spice. It is very lightweight, and not just because there’s so little of it. It is also slightly sticky. It tastes like I just smoked my freshly washed tied-dyed shirt from the moment I put down the pipe.
Verdict: This felt like less than 30 mg. For the rest: see below.
Final thoughts:
I am totally fed up with this taste. I am also unsure about the consequences it may have for my body if I smoke all of it eventually. I have only smoked 90 mg of it so far meaning I vaporized far less than 10 mg of unwanted materials into my lungs. Seeing how these substances get smeared, injected and generally put into every tissue and orifice of many a poor rodent before it is released out into the wild (the chemical, not the rodent!), I do not fear these fragrant synthetic oils very much. And the fact that my pipe still smelled of it, increases my confidence that I indeed vaporized them instead of burning them and giving rise all sorts of unsavoury by-products. So their toxicological data still applies. But I fear them just enough to say: no more! I see a lot of merit in the effects, but I just screwed it up. I will mix them all up and name them combined JJS. And keep just half a gram for posterity. I will zinc-reduce the rest; that should give a nice benchmark if the reduction step has *any* merit in case reducing the fumarates will not prove to be of any merit.
It was fun while it lasted, but these JimJam’s and I have to part ways.
I will come back to this however, with fresh xylene and fresh vessels. I still have a pound of bark left….

Step 2 - salting with FASA (a crash course)

And on we go with the remaining 75% of all pools. They were FASA-salted separately, but in the end they all ended up on the same pile, save for one exception.

Fumaric Acid Saturated Acetone was prepared pretty straightforward by heaping an overkill amount of about 10 grams of fumaric acid p.a. into a HDPE 100ml jar, added 100ml of sodium-sulphate-dried anhydrous acetone (there was still room for air at the top), and shaking the hell out of it for a minute or so, repeating the shaking several times a day. I made one batch of FASA per day as needed in this way and this amount. It was unnecessary to have more of it or faster. I didn’t weigh any of it and just assume that about 5.5 mg/ml of fumaric acid was dissolved (a little less than the standard 6 mg/ml because it’s winter here, and the room is cooler than normal). In using it, I just decanted the FASA off the fumaric acid that was at the bottom, directly into the reaction-beaker and then added fresh acetone to what was left, thus making a new batch of FASA. The maximum capacity for that amount of fumaric acid is 30 g of freebase and at 700 g of MHRB, I am *way* on the safe side of things.

Pool 1 (75% thereof, the other 25% was evaporating) was transferred to a large, 1 litre beaker and 80 ml of FASA added in about 10 equal portions over the course of 4 hours and allowed to precipitate for a day while I prepared the next batch of FASA. About 500 ml of FASA was added in this way over the course of 5 days. The first batch of 80ml FASA had a hard time mixing with the xylene, forming a distinct layer that would only mix with the rest after agitation of the beaker. Subsequent additions mixed with the xylene virtually by themselves. It would appear that only after adding a certain amount of acetone does the fumarate form little clumps heavy enough (or the xylene becomes light enough) to make them sink to the bottom. A shiteload of fumarates had crystallized and sunk to the bottom of the beaker. The xylene/fumarates mixture was filtered over a paper filter. Stuck crystals were scraped off the glass’s sides and bottom using acetone. This acetone was then used to rinse the filter and the residue therein. Repeated 5 times. There was stuck on the bottom of the beaker a large (3 cm) piece of fumarates (?), much darker in colour than the finer, loose material that had precipitated slowly. It was hard and brittle and about 0.6 g. Could this be the fumarate of DMT-oxide? I broke it up, washed it and added it to the other fumarates in the filter. I used 550 ml of acetone in total on this pool. The filter was air-dried and the residue scraped off. Result was 7.7 g of fumarates. With the amount of fumaric acid added, I calculated that 8.8 g was the max. (400 x 5.5 = 2750 x 4 = about 8800 mg, for a total of 6690 mg of freebase equivalent). The xylene is hereby deemed to be exhausted of fumaratables and it was subsequently recycled back to pulling more spice.
At any rate, I recovered 71% of the maximum fumarate yield based on the JJS-based calculated yield of this pool.

Pool 2 (75% thereof, the other 25% was evaporating) went much the same. Except this time just 2x 80ml of FASA went in because the amount of precipitation observed was significantly less. The chunk of unknown fumarates stuck at the bottom (yes it was there again!) weighed in at 0.5 g, for a total of 0.9 g of fumarates, a 0.68 g freebase equivalent. I used a total 250ml of acetone on this pool. I can see where this is going. 160 x 5.5 x 4 = 3.52 g was the maximum capacity of my added fumaric acid, so no more fumarates can be had from this pool. At any rate, I recovered 25% of the maximum fumarate yield based on the JJS-based yield of this pool instead of the real-world 71% of pool 1. I was obviously pulling comparatively more oils as the pulls progressed. It does not bode well pool 3.

Pool 3 (75% thereof, the other 25% was evaporating) I salted with just 80ml of FASA. Out of this pool there precipitated more than the previous, probably because I was rather diligent in trying to get the last bit out of the soup. I decided against a second addition of FASA, seeing how I had put a factor 4 surplus of FASA in the salting of pool 2. This time the (in)famous cake-stuck-at-the-bottom was less large (0.2g), more orange and more oily. Washing with acetone did not dissolve it to any appreciable degree, but it sure looked and felt waxy. It didn’t smell much of spice, either, so fumarates I deemed it to be. It weighed in at 1.2g. Hey! That is strange! I have now even more than the calculated amount of fumarates as predicted by the JJS of the same pool? Why? I would think that by this point the ratio of tryptamine-fumarates to ‘empty’ fumarates would shift even more in favour of the latter than was the case with pool 2, but apparently the reverse is true. Pool 3’s JJS does look very different from the others. Have I made an error somewhere? The plot thickens.. (I’ve always wanted to say that). 80 x 5.5 x 4 = 1.76 g, so no more fumarates should be / could be had from this pool.

348q63s.jpg

The DMT-fumarates of all three pools were combined, resulting in 11.7 g in the collection-bottle. I call it ‘Total Fums’ from here on. (see picture above of a 100 ml Kimax-bottle)

Pool x : The combined exhausted xylene pulls had their acetone removed after salting was completed (see note below) and were dried again with Na2SO4, amounting to 800ml. I should have 75% of 1600ml, not 50%. Why the large loss? The drying-agent absorbs quite a lot and I didn’t rinse it out with the same amount that was in it *every* time. Also, it’s been three weeks since I started. I am losing more and more through handling and involuntary evapping, lol.
pmvp.jpg

I added 2x 80ml of FASA to this ‘exhausted’ combo-pool and watched (Presto!) some more crashing out occur. After 24 hours a darker type of fumarates was at the bottom, with most of it sticking to it quite affectionately. Had to use a razorblade to scrape it off there. Washing with acetone made it lighter in colour, but it is still the darkest of them all. I did notice that for the first time in these workings, I had fumarates which were sparkling. Up until now my fumarates had all been of the dull persuasion. These look *exactly* (see pic left) like the first picture in endlessness’s ‘fumarate to freebase’-thread, colour and all: DMT fumarate conversion comparison (pics) - FASA/FASI/FASW - Welcome to the DMT-Nexus. Endlessness got a 45% freebase yield (instead of a theoretical 76%) off that one. Let’s see how mine compares: I will keep a single gram of this batch separate from the rest, to see if the sparkles are an indication of anything of note. Total yield 2.9g of fumarates, a (potential) 2.20 g freebase equivalent, which is more than pools 2 and 3 (75% thereof) combined! How is that for weird?! I used a total of 250 ml of acetone. 160 x 5.5 x 4 = 3.52 g was the maximum capacity of my added fumaric acid, so I can only assume it is all exhausted by now. If not, it’ll be added to the mix when I next re-use that xylene. Or when I evaporate it totally and de-fat the residues to death before using it, seeing how my stupidity makes anything directly off it permanently floral-smelling. I will go for evaporation of all the xylene and a total clean-up to pure DMT, but that will be in the coming summer which is six months from now, because I am not even going to try to evaporate 800 ml of xylene in sub-zero conditions.
Still, I am intrigued by the 100+% yield of pool 3. Could it be that the xylene still holds some secrets?

Note: I did of course wash all my xylene with water before reusing it to remove the acetone, pool by pool. I noticed that pool 1 yielded same-colour xylene and a clear, uncoloured water/acetone-phase. Pool 2 went a different way: the xylene lost some of its colour with the washing while the water/acetone-phase went all tea-like on me. Stranger and stranger… my guess: it is soaps, tiny amounts thereof, that have formed as the time passed while the lye was in contact with the root bark (or indeed the oils from my fabric-softener-mishap). This soap pulled a bit of mostly NP-stuff that has a polar shrubbery on its molecule, out of the xylene and into the watery-phase during the wash. I guess my xylene is quite literally cleaned now, lol. I am not an organic analyst, mind you. Better explanations are welcomed. Nothing interesting happened with washing the pool 3 xylene.

Experiment z - just one more FASA pull, please.
For the answer to the why I did this, see Step 3 - Procedure B - pool x. I dried all my xylene and added another 50 ml of FASA to it. Some crashing out occurred. Mind you, this is with xylene that has been deemed exhausted twice already, and the last batch of fumarates that came out of this was VERY active.
I got 0.35 g of fumarates this third time that were darker of colour still. It should yield about two trips’ worth of spice, but I will consider it scraps. It goes with the rest of the fumarates, but I might as well have skipped this step. Exhausted the xylene is.

At this point in time, I had to wait until my supplies were delivered (practically all the chemicals I use hereafter) before I could start any of the three processes I have in mind. I have good hopes that there will be less interesting observations to note down in this journal from now on, so the remainder of it probably won’t be as lengthy as it has been up until now (yeah, right…).
 
Step 3 - processing the fumarates (let it snow)
Whenever I write about volumes here, they are calculated from their weight: I always put everything on my top-loading balance when I add reagents together and do not use a graduated cylinder or some such. The amounts we’re working with here are just too small for my taste and would lead to unnecessary losses if I did. When I use just water, I exchange g -> ml directly. Weights between brackets are an approximation. From this point on, I only used distilled water.
Endlessness’s experiment and discussion on freebasing fumarates: DMT fumarate conversion comparison (pics) - FASA/FASI/FASW - Welcome to the DMT-Nexus . It is also in the Wiki, I believe. I used this as the recipe for freebasing. Thanks, Endlessness!
Whenever I convert my dissolved salts to freebase in these procedures, I let it crash out with soda and then decant or filter. I *could* also extract with naphtha or heptane and freeze precipitate, but decided against it: heptane is expensive, I wish to re-x with heptane anyway plus I am interested in what gets left behind between converting to freebase and heptane re-x. It’s supposed to be the ‘honey-oil’ that is arguably DMT-n-oxide, right? I would love to try that straight up, too. So I stuck with Endlessnesses method.

Procedure B - direct freebasing (quick and dirty)
Total Fums – method, observations, musings
3.00 g of the fumarates were dissolved in 150 ml of water, at about 25*C. Light clear-yellow coloured solution, Pantone PMS 101 (but I can’t be exactly sure because this was a new vessel and a new solvent altogether. “A New Solvent!”). The solution was slightly murky, as an estimated few dozen milligrams of particles did not dissolve. Couldn’t make out if these were solid or liquid; they were very mobile. I forewent on the desire to filter it all off beforehand. If it’s the purest of crystal I want, I will do a re-x later.

Soda-water was prepared by dissolving 80 g carbonate of soda (Na2CO3) in 200 ml of lukewarm water and allowed to cool to room temperature. Not all had dissolved. 20 g (about15 ml) of this solution was decanted into the fumarate-solution. An immediate crashing-out occurred. I love the fact that the moment you combine the two solutions, the smell of spice is immediately released from the vessel, whereas before it was completely odourless. The beaker (of unscratched borosilicate glass; my trusty Coulter-counter glass) was covered up and left to stand in a cool room. After 5 hours, no visible amount of crystallization had taken place and I went to bed at this point.

2vjao0o.jpg

Sideview

241oy8n.jpg

Topview

By morning, my leftover soda-water mother liquor had dumped a rather large amount of crystals to the bottom of its beaker. Seems my solution was super-saturated. I am glad I didn’t just dump the lot in with my fumarates. Remember: it is just to get the solution pretty basic. Unlike with FASA, you *can* put too much and have DMT-encrusted stalagmites of Na2CO3 (or the reverse!) in your vessel when overzealous. Yes, back to the crystallizing: the milkyness had diminished greatly and had started to sink to the bottom, leaving 1 cm of clear, colourless liquid in the top-part of the solution. Six more centimetres to go. Light, thin needles were stuck to the wall there (just a few mg) and a dense, yellow precipitate had started to form on the bottom. I could not see into the vessel yet, too murky. 36 hours: almost ready as virtually all had sunk to the bottom and coalesced into crystals. Hope the morning will bring clear solutions and lots of precipitates.

Well, it did. Looks wonderful. Like Superman’s Fortress of Solitude wonderful. There was still a little bit of fog in between the needles, like all Fortresses of Solitude have, but this went away with a gentle swirling of the vessel. Whether it was carbonates or spices I don’t know, but I hope it was spices that stuck themselves to the existing crystals when I swirled them. Some needle-encrusted pond-scum of an off-white colour floated at the top.

About the pictures: in the side-view photograph the spice is actually whiter than it really was. There was snow outside and I was doing this right next to the windowsill, no flash. This is how my HDR software interpreted the light. The top-view photo I ‘grunged’ a bit for dramatic purposes :d It’s got a small depth of field so the crystals stand out quite nicely, sandwiched between blurry area’s. Stuck my lens half an inch into the beaker I did. Lol! Remember that these needles are standing in over three inches of liquid and this shows just how clean was the crashing out. It was coming from, graphically speaking, unskimmed milk. I am pleased. What you do see is those tiny yellow blotches of something that are scattered throughout the needlework. Oxides? Just fats? My softener? Xylene? Something else? I don’t know and this is exactly why I planned on procedure C.

So, I decanted the lot over a paper filter after I scraped the fortress out of its glassy confines, and noted how easy this is because once you touch that scaffolding of needles with a spoon it comes crashing down right into that same spoon where I can just scoop it all up and put it into the filter. An analytical rubber wiper (the kind you put on the end of a glass rod to wipe the inside of your glassware with, used in gravimetric determinations and such) was used to wipe everything clean while rinsing with distilled water, eventually transferring all the washes to the filter containing the goodies. Thus the filter was washed with about 5x 10 ml of water. I assume that almost all of the fumarate- and sodium/carbonate-ions were washed away at this point.
Note: Another experiment done later proved that this need not be the case. Although the amount’s of carbonates are small, , there could still be some in there after 5 washes. One needs to make a strongly diluted vinegar solution to neutralize it, and then wash it with water 5 times.
The freebase spice was transferred to a fresh Petri dish (a nice pile of brittle, needled yellow clay) and allowed to dry at 25*C. Hardly any stuck to the filter and I was careful not to scrape any fibres off that paper filter. I’m sure some went in, but no more than a milligram or two. It was then weighed. Ideally, the fumarate used should produce 76% of 3 g equalling 2.28 g of freebase. This freebase weighs in at 1.58 g, that’s 53% based on the salt, or a yield of 69% of theoretical. It certainly does not smell of softener, but more like citrus, if at all. The density is fluffy: my vial was filled to the brim with this 1.6 g, whereas I filled another one with 2 g of pool 1 JJS.

Total fums - qualitative
Bodymind: Very nice, relaxed visuals. Because I could sense the relaxedness, I quickly closed my eyes during the onset. No gems in my mouth. There was not so much pattern-visuals; I was much more an observer to a scene of creature(s) working in a room. My body felt totally at ease. I felt very peaceful. The residues were a bit stoning. No yawning, no tears.
Entities: Oh yes. There was definitely one little gnome-clown with a proportionally huge head who was doing stuff involving classic tools at a table stood in a snow-white and the seven dwarfs (Hey! I kicked you guys out!) fairytale-like wooden room. After completing a few actions with the tools (very fast!), he/she/it would step forward from behind the table into full view, look at me quizzically, and step outside of my field of vision. Then would come a few kaleidoscopic visuals, and the scene would again turn to this room, having the same script. This sequence repeated itself about a dozen times. But I can’t for the world recall many details about his appearance, other than the scale of body parts in relation to references like the room and the table. There might have been a second one always on the edge of my field of vision. I get that a lot, the ‘on the edge of my vision‘ feeling.
Taste/appearance: Love this taste. So neutral. Mind you, I enjoy the ‘plastic’ taste of DMT so much, it’s already my baseline for spice, taste-wise. The soft-yellow needle-like structure of it is also very nice-looking.
Verdict: Love it! But it could do with a higher dose. I am going to continue with this 30 mg regime though. I want to exclude as many variables as I can. I now smoke at least 10 times more often than is usual for me anyway. Strangely, after smoking spice almost every day for a week now, I don’t really have the feeling I have to ‘integrate’ any of this. I feel like an observer, which is fine for now. But I do hope to feel more involvement later when I go experiment with myself as the variable, instead of the spice.

Pool x - method, observations, musings
I did the single gram of set-aside sparkly pool x fumarates at the same time. Used a 100 ml quartz beaker here. 1.00 g in 50 ml with 8 g (5 ml) of soda-water. All observation were mostly the same, except that after 12 hours, when the first needles started to make themselves known, I could see that the needles were floating on top of what appeared to be a layer of water. Could it be that I did not stir enough and that this is water heavy from carbonates that haven’t mixed? I prayed it wouldn’t solidify like my mother liquor had… Luckily, it didn’t. Unluckily, the (now more condensed) ‘cloud’ stayed just that: a cloud with some solids hovering in there. I stirred quite strongly with a spatula and an hour later the liquid went almost completely clear. I now have a large gob of brownish-yellow needled smeg floating in a glass and a ring of fatty solids sticking halfway to the glass’s wall. It looks like the main batch, but a lot less of it so defects are more easily seen. There’s also more yellow oil sticking and floating around. It didn’t photograph well. All was decanted and filtered like above and I was left with a small pile of basically the same appearance, but more yellow.
Ideally, the fumarate used should produce 76% of 1 g equalling 0.76 g of freebase. My freebase weighs in at 0.44 g, that’s 44% based on the salt, or a yield of 58% of theoretical.
Hey! At 44%, I have almost exactly the same yield as endlessness had in his thread, the material I likened my pool x to. Visual similarity meant chemical similarity in this case, apparently!
A few hard, darker yellow pieces were in there. They could have been carbonates, but test-vaporizing the largest of these hard chunks (10 mg) left no residue at all. I will save this 430 mg to qualitatively assess it. However: this ‘sparkly’ fumarate that I had such high hopes for, sadly yields less then the averaged-out total fums. With any luck it will yield more in the qualitative field. Still, all this means that the fumarates that came from xylene that I thought was exhausted gave me 1.2 g of spice that would otherwise have been lost (unless one recycles the xylene, of course). Call me crazy, but I am going to do one more FASA salting with my now twice considered exhausted xylene. To see if there’s a third one in there somewhere. This step has been covered in the previous chapter, labelled experiment z.

Pool x - qualitative
Bodymind: Beautiful but normal, kaleidoscopic CEV’s. What set this apart from other experiences was the relative slowness with which everything happened. I could actually follow every move and shape-change from arcs to bubbles to grids to mandala’s. Vivid colours. Very gentle on both the body and the mind. Could hardly notice a carrier-wave, if any. Very nice. No choking on pebbles for me at all. The background colour was white. The residues were VERY relaxing, stoning even. I did not like this residual feeling very much, because I have cut down on my cannabis-use by 90% since one year now. After being a bi-daily user for 25 years, I just don’t like being stoned so much anymore. But that’s just me.
Entities: Maybe. The visuals had so much personality to them, I might have anthropomorphisised them. But the colours felt alive. No doubt.
Taste/appearance: Excellent! No foulness, no harshness, so very smooth. And it’s looks even exceed those of the total fums.
Verdict: Very nice spice. A totally easy ride. I would recommend this to a first-timer who has a history of cannabis use: the climb and plateau will be alien without freaking him or her out, and the residues will feel so very familiar. Is it better than the main batch? No, nor is it worse; it’s just different.

Procedure C – de-fatting and freebasing (clean and easy)
Total fums - method, observations, musings
3.00 g of the fumarates were dissolved in 150 ml of water as before with procedure B. All observations there repeated themselves here exactly, thankfully. I did not add extra vinegar for extra acidity. I suppose I could have, but with this amount of fumarates, I guess it’s acidic enough. However, if someone should want to de-fat half a gram in 100 ml, I would suggest adding a dash of vinegar, just to be sure all the goodies stay in the polar-phase.

This was defatted by extracting in a sep-funnel with 3 x 20 g of naphtha, letting the layers separate for 20 minutes in between extractions. None of the naphtha changed colour at any time, and neither did the fumarates-solution. If nothing else, this step does present an opportunity to rid the fumarates of contaminants like dust and lint (hey, I do not have a cleanroom, ok?). The scarce emulsions were pooled with the naphtha and discarded. I did wash all my glassware in between de-fats with acetone and I did evaporate all the naphtha to smell the residues: I do not want a single molecule of that dis-scent to remain in my spice. The naphtha-residue did not smell like my JJS’s at all. So the FASA technique left all the baddies outside the gates of heaven. Where they belong.

Soda-water was prepared with 20 g Na2CO3 in 100 ml. I made it a little less concentrated and did not warm it because the amount of soda that would not stay in solution earlier.. well, it felt like overkill to dissolve 40 g in 100 ml, so I halved it. I noticed this: dissolving anhydrous Na2CO3 in water is an exothermic reaction, whereas dissolving the deca-hydrate of sodium-carbonate (my earlier crashed out mother-liquor) is an endothermic one. Lol…..

When held up to the light I could see some ultrathin fibres still floating in the fumarate-solution. I decided to filter the lot before basifying and sure enough it was now crystal-clear. 20 g of liquor was added and a strong crashing out occurred, naturally. Covered it up and left for bed. Got some crystals in the morning, but the solution was still very milky. Went to work, came home, no change: just a little bit of needles on the bottom, not at all like in procedure B. I tested the solution with some more soda-water. WTF?? Crashing out? I did not make it basic enough? I did not think it would be possible. I was under the impression that in principle, an equimolar amount of soda to fumarates over neutrality is enough ions of CO32- (is this first a ‘Lewis-base’ or first a ‘Bronsted/Lowry-base’?) to send everything into freebase-form. Obviously I was wrong, but this means that there is relatively narrow range of sodium-carbonate one should add. Oh noes: not another variable to tweak, please! Lesson learned: always make a saturated Na2CO3-solution for this, like endlessness does. I added more of my soda water to be sure. Final volume was 250 ml; my beaker could *just* hold it.

One day later the solution had cleared to almost crystal-clear. I scooped out as much as I could using a normal steel spoon, dumping it into the paper filter and filtering the rest through that very same filter. Washed it with a copious 10x 10 ml of distilled water. Although it looked like I had a LOT less than with procedure B when it was in the beaker, it wasn’t at all bad. The ‘scaffolding’ of needle-shaped crystals was just more tightly build. Like with procedure B, it filled my tiny paper filter almost to the brim. It was a whole lot more clear though, hardly yellow at all. It even had a greenish tinge over it, and was definitely not clay-like. A real ‘pile-o-needles’.
Ideally, the fumarate used should produce 76% of 3 g equalling 2.28 g of freebase. My freebase weighs in at 1.50 g, that’s 50% based on the salt, or a yield of 66% of theoretical. So, I washed out 3% absolute with my de-fatting. Not as much as I feared. So 3% fats came with the fumarates… I wonder what the 31% (see procedure B) is that did not make it into the final spice. This why I want procedure D. Logically, this step makes not much sense because the FASA method is already a method of separation. But it will give me an indication if any of that illusive 31% can be reverted back to DMT and in doing so effectively identifying some of it as DMT-oxide.

Total fums - qualitative
Bodymind: Visuals went very fast, but I could just keep up with them. Had to close my eyes at about the 20 second-mark after putting down the pipe. The room, which was extremely messy, became totally organised, modern and ‘tight’ looking. I often have a Mexican-restaurant-vibe with this LEGOland appearance, but it was very clear this time. Very nice feeling throughout. No bodily discomfort of any kind at all. I also chuckled a great deal. I felt ‘at home’ if that makes any sense. This might have something to do with the entities.
Entities: Wow! They were literally everywhere. They were the visuals, not separate from them. I would see, in a split-second, a small pile of purple ‘Mikado’-sticks on an imaginary table. The pile would notice me noticing it, make a funny noise and go POP!, exploding into a thousand small purple sticks flying in all directions. This sort of stuff went on everywhere. They had personality, interpreted by me as mostly ‘cartoony’, but I realize that it was probably my own psyche that made me see them like this. However, I was still an observer. I could not feel or see them interacting with me physically. They didn’t ‘jump in and out of my chest’, as Terrence McKenna described. I was not even aware that I was standing in a space. It was more like watching a movie on a screen, but a very interactive movie at that. I suppose this was due to the dosage, which was low.
Taste/appearance: Excellent taste. No fragrance at all, just spice. And looks even better than any of the previous, too.
Verdict: I loved this. Very much. The entities made it the most special experience I have had with spice yet. Amen to this.
 
Procedure D - Reduction and freebasing (hot and spicy)

It’s been suggested that DMT-n-oxide also reacts with fumaric acid to form fumarates. Hence, there should be some in my total fums. I am hoping to convert this to DMT, proven by higher yields as compared to procedure C for sure (because I de-fatted and filtered that one), and to procedure B perhaps (because the oxide should also crash out in that one, and the presence of those yellow blobs in there would suggest that they might have). What’s more, I secretly hope that the ‘chunks’ I got on the bottom of the beaker with pool 1 and pool 2 were oxides. If so, I should really have a higher yield as with B and C, assuming the reduction with zinc works at all.
At first I wanted to see if different types of acid would change the outcome, but decided against it. There are a few experiments with hydrochloric described here on the Nexus, but they didn’t seem to work that good. I’ve also read here that all the successful experiments as carried out by researchers years ago were all done with acetic acid. I didn’t read those papers, so I decided to make the concentration the variable. I prepared some 36% from glacial, and used it to make various strengths: 9% (table-vinegar), 18% (pickling-vinegar) and undiluted 36% (un-culinary strength!) concentrations. That last one seems concentrated enough to me: I’ll forego on using glacial neat. The zinc used was obtained from a chemical company, and was ultra-fine. Literally as fine as could be, but sorry: no BET-value available.

9% acetic acid - method, observations, musings
1.00 g of the total fums was dissolved in a 100 ml beaker in 45 ml water and 15 ml of 36% acetic acid was added to this, making it a 9% vinegar-solution. The colour was PMS 101 and it was slightly murky. 2 g of Zn powder was added and the contents of the beaker immediately stirred vigorously to get a suspension of Zn for as long as it would stay buoyant. Which was about 5 minutes, and the solution was totally clear and colourless when the zinc had sunk. A few bubbles of presumably hydrogen came into being at the zinc’s surface, making the whole reaction just slightly effervescent. I hoped that the bubbles emanating from the centre of the beaker would create some kind of convection in there, assuring a circulating flow of all reducible material to the source of nascent hydrogen. The zinc-powder would coalesce into blobs, presumably by the difference in surface-tension between the vinegar and the bubbles of hydrogen. All this was left to stand for 4 hours with a quick stir every hour or so. The pH of the solution was 4 in the end (test-paper). I wonder if this could be correct; I calculated it to be around 2. Could the fumarates and Zn have used up so much protons? My pH paper is old though, it could be off a bit and so could my interpreting the papers’ colours.

After these 4 hours, I filtered the solution (recovered 1.8 g of Zn), washed the filter with 3 x 20 ml of fresh water and transferred everything to my trusty Coulter-glass. I did have to add a lot of saturated Na2CO3 solution before it was all even neutral. This does not bode well for the 18 and 36% solutions; I can’t add a quadruple amount! So for the 18% I will have to make a super-saturated solution using 60+ centigrade water, and for the 36% I will neutralize to pH 4 with NaOH solution first. This is an important side-effect of using crash-out purification to freebase in this way. Extracting with naphtha (to really liberate it from the basic solution) would be better , but I just don’t want to skew the numbers right now (I could have unforeseeable losses from handling such small amounts). Adding the carbonate-solution generated a lot of gas. I stopped basifying when the precipitate persisted. It measured pH 8. I put the beaker of now totally white (and I mean white!) milk to rest for the night. Wut??? No crystallizing observable, just a bottom of milky sludge. Ok then: extracting. Extracted with 4 x 25 ml of naphtha. The white muck remained in the polar phase all the time. I conclude it is Zn(OH)2, as zinc is the only anion apart from hydrogen that I can imagine being in there. Most metal-hydroxides are insoluble in water. This also means my elaborate plans for basifying the next two acetic acid solutions can be tossed out: if I’m going to extract anyway I might as well use any amount of NaOH needed.

After the extraction, I extracted once more with 15 ml of naphtha and let this evaporate quickly on a warm glass dish. Something translucent stayed behind in the dish, but it was close to nothing, and it also did not smell like DMT very much when heated. After heating it left a nasty stain on my spatula, so it’s probably some hydroxides that carried over (I didn’t dry this test-fraction). 100 ml of naphtha should hold 1 g of DMT. I have a theoretical 0.76 g in there, so I should have 95% of the spice in the naphtha now. I dried the main naphtha extract by filtering through some anhydrous Na2SO4 and washing the filter with 2 x 10 ml of fresh naphtha, I popped the naphtha (it was 110 ml) in the freezer for 48 hours. BTW: all my naphtha in all these “acetic acid/total fums” procedures was always completely colourless. Not even a hint of yellow. After decanting the naphtha and drying the goodies, I got 0.39 g of totally white, sparkly goodies. (see pic, Holy depth of field Batman! Oh: sorry about the red lint. The yellow tan is due to some radiosity effect from my putting the lens at an inch’s distance from the stuff)

I wasn’t pleased with that amount, so I increased the pH of the solution to 12 and re-extracted with the same naphtha (3 x 30 ml). I tell you, extracting this much more basic solution was a pain. I got a lot more emulsions and separating was more troublesome. The Zn(OH)2 stuck to every bit of glass it came into contact with, especially my separating-funnel.
After 16 hours in the freezer (so short because my naphtha should already be saturated with DMT at the temperature I freeze-precipitate) quite a few more crystals crashed out. These were removed like above and they looked like above. They weighed in at 0.15 g, for a total of 0.44 g of very white, and I assume pure, DMT. That’s 44% based on the salt, or a yield of 57% of theoretical. This is less than my de-fatted procedure C spice. Darn! That’s bad. On the other hand, this stuff is SO white, it’s impressive. It’s possible that increasing the concentration of the acetic acid will increase the yield.
Incidentally, I assessed these two DMT’s separately:

9% - qualitative
pH 8 spice:
309pis9.jpg

Bodymind: Oh my… SO intense, deep and fast... SO completely techno and yet with some very extreme interludes of something completely different, like a window or porthole opening to a completely other space, for split-seconds at a time…. But all the while so completely impersonal. I felt nothing: no empathy, no apprehension, no friendliness, no love, no hate, no nuthin’. And the bodily residual feeling started so early, like halfway through, and it was so stoning. I felt as if I sank a foot into the leather recliner I was sitting in. I yawned and yawned (physical reaction to whatever) until my jaw felt sore and I just *had* to force my body from the chair.
Entities: None. There was nothing and nobody.
Taste/appearance: Excellent taste! Loved every bit of this! And for the looks: well, the white spice always looks nice. This one is a bit more… like lemon sherbet. You know, opaque white instead of clear.
Verdict: This felt like a souped-up version of pool 2 JJS but more impersonal and with the residues feeling twice as stoning. It was more easy to snap out of them though… For me, this experience was precisely what I was trying to get away from, bar the absence of gems in my mouth. Perhaps at a higher dose it could still be worthwhile, but at this level: no. Finding out if this higher-dose paradigm hold true for me will mean experimenting on myself and that is beyond the scope of this report.

pH 12 spice:
2hf76ug.jpg

Bodymind: Pretty much the same as the pH8-DMT, but feeling more benign. Everything felt more ‘stretched’, including having CEV’s whilst deep in the residual phase. It could be I have smoked less efficient this time.
Entities: Same as before
Taste/appearance: Same as before. The purple colour in the photograph is because I had switched on my space-lights in the room. Sorry about that, but it does look nice, no?
Verdict: My opinion is the same as with the pH 8 spice. I will combine the two spices. They feel and look completely interchangeable.
The thought of trying to transform this spice back into ANY procedure C DMT keeps crossing my mind. It would entail giving it back to my perfumed spice, FASA-salting it and freebasing again. Then again, it could be an excellent candidate for trying my hands on some re-crystallization with heptane….

18% acetic acid - method, observations, musings
Dissolved 1.00 g of total fums in 30 ml of water, added 30 ml of 36% acetic acid (pH=3) and added 2.0 g of powdered zinc. Everything went as before, except for the slightly more frothy reaction and an unspeakable, faecal smell (and I don’t mean it smelled like shit, it just smelled like, well, shit.)
After four hours, I lost 350 mg of mass and I recovered 1.80 g of zinc, again (huh?)
Basifying until neutrality used up quite a lot of 10% NaOH. It’s easy to see, because the precipitate of Zn(OH)2 becomes persistent whereas before it re-dissolved in the solution. A dash of extra lye immediately pushes it to pH12, releasing the tell-tale smell of tryptamines into the air. (yum!)
Extracting was a bitch this time. ALL the hydroxides were afloat, and mixed themselves with the naphtha.
I had to treat this “hydroxide” layer separately in a beaker and saturate it with a dozen or so teaspoons of Na2CO3. This had a threefold effect: it bound to the water and made it sink to the bottom taking some hydroxides with it, it reduced the ratio of hydroxides to water, and because this reaction is exothermic it facilitated the separation of the naphtha even more. So, no biggie but still a hassle compared to the previous (9%) experiment. I also resorted to gently rocking the funnel for five minutes, as opposed to my usual “shaking the hell out of it for 20 seconds”. Repeated this several times, pooling the solvents in a 100 ml separating funnel. The clear watery, hydroxide-free phase was also extracted 3 times and the solvent added to the funnel for final separation and washing with fresh water. Incidentally, I re-used all the naphtha from the freeze precipitation of the previous experiment (plus some extra). I know it will slightly skew the results (again), but I choose to be efficient wilfully.
I used a lot more naphtha this time (6 x 25 ml) so I let it evaporate overnight to about half that, then dried over sodium sulphate and popped it into the freezer for 24 hours.
I took the crystals out as before and dried. It yielded 0.35 g of the exact same spice, from an appearance point-of-view. That’s 35% based on the salt, or a yield of 46% of theoretical. So little…. These yields go down and down, most likely because of all the extra steps, washings and extractions involved. The percentile losses just keep piling up, resulting in less and less freebase, and so far less and less qualitatively desirable freebase at that, too...

18% - qualitative
It all feels the same as both the 9% DMT’s.

36% acetic acid - method, observations, musings
Dissolved 1.00 g of total fums in 60 ml of 36% acetic acid (pH=2, no really. Doubling the concentration does indeed decrease the pH by 1 point each time. Note that you’ll never reach pH 0 with this.) and added 2.0 g of powdered zinc. Reaction proceeded as before, this time with an even stronger bubbling. I can still hardly describe it as ‘vigorous’ though. I lost 1 gram of mass in the reaction, and 1.5 g of zinc was recovered. If I was to remove any unwanted non-polar components, this would be the time to extract them. Extracting with 2 x 20 ml naphtha while the solution is acidic is the way to go here.
Wizened from the previous experience, I basified to pH8 using a lot of 20% NaOH (3 times as much as there was solution, for a total volume of about 200 ml!) and extracted with 3 x 20 ml of the naphtha that was recovered from the previous freeze precipitation. The solution became quite hot during basification. After these 3 pulls, the polar phase was basified to pH12 (it needed just 10-20 ml more lye-solution) and extracted again with 3 x 20 ml naphtha. I like the results of this 2-step extraction: it makes dealing with the hydroxides a lot less troublesome. The pooled extracts were dried over Na2SO4, left to stand overnight to evaporate to about 90 ml (yes, that’s the reverse of what I did before) and put into the freezer in the morning. 36 hours later, they were removed and separated from the naphtha as before. The crystals weighed in at 0.58 g! That’s 58% based on the salt, or a yield of 76% of theoretical. Finally, I got more than my procedure C spice and even more than procedure B. This is more like it. I see this as a strong indication that there is something being turned from non-DMT into DMT proper. Whether the product of this reduction is desirable however, is a matter of personal preference. It’s too bad I did not follow the exact same procedure with all three reductions to make the comparison really solid. For instance, it might be that not all DMT had precipitated in previous freezes and the surplus was deposited out of the recycled naphtha with this freeze, giving rise to the following: 0.44 + 0.35 + 0.58 = 1.47 g of combined DMT from 3.0 g of total fums, a 49% yield based on the salt, or 64% of theoretical. The yield, on average, being so low could mean that either Zn-reduction doesn’t work or, more hopeful, that hardly any reducible material was present in the total fums. This would mean that DMT-n-oxide had NOT precipitated with FASA-salting, and that the 31% I was missing at procedure B, whatever it is composed of, cannot be converted into DMT. Yet the data is sketchy and a reduction of the JJS should give more conclusive evidence. But I do have enough data now to postulate a guideline:
• Use no less than 36% acetic acid. 72% might be best. 100% is probably too much.
• Use at least equal the mass of zinc to the mass of spice.
• Let the reaction proceed for at least 4 hours.
• Use two-step basifying and extracting with 10% NaOH-solution at pH8 and subsequently pH12. If nothing else, it will make extracting the freebase so much more easy and reduce losses.
• Extract 3 times at both pH-levels, using a volume of 20 times the weight of spice for each.
• Evaporate to a volume of 100 times the weight of spice used. Evaporating to 50 times is better.
• Let pooled extracts freeze for at least 36 hours.
• Collect snow-white DMT (shut up, Dopey. GTFO!).
BTW: I evaporated the naphtha after it gave up all of it’s DMT in all freezes. It yielded no more than 20 mg of DMT, from about 90 ml. Sweet!

36% - qualitative
Again, this spice feels the same as the other three kinds above. Between all of them, there were subtle and sometimes less subtle differences, but I attribute those to changes in my smoking efficiency, as well as my bodily state and mental state at those times. The visuals all sing to the same tune (very laser-lightshow like), the entities just aren’t there in that I can sense no trace of them (it feels very impersonal, yet not ‘cold’ in the sense of the word) and the appearance and taste are virtually the same (one type may be slightly more chunky, but this is due to how fast it crystallised out). So all in all: yes, this is good spice. I assume it is >95% DMT. But it just isn’t what I prefer. The state of torpor my body wants to slip into in the residual-effect phase of the trip is just too much for me to handle. I hate the feeling of a very active mind (and it is active while on and after the trip) in an essentially paralysed and comatose body. I will not consume more of this in my ‘reverse order’ test that I am going to start in few days time. I’ve smoked 4 different kinds of this stuff, and I have enough for now. What I will do some time however, is smoke 60 mg of it. Perhaps there is some kind synergy going on that will blow me out of the water. I will combine these, save half a vial of it and use the rest in re-crystallization experiments, which is something I have never done yet, only inorganically with aluminium-salts. It should be great fun!

263966h.jpg

29dvdj6.jpg


The pictures above are of the exact same dish. The spice is just spread out differently.

JimJam reduction (it’s a dirty job, but somebody’s got to do it)
An amount of 1.00 g of combined JJS was dissolved in 50 ml of 36% acetic acid. Not everything dissolved; a lot of muck kept being afloat on the top and sticking to the glass. The solution remained cloudy as well. Added 2.0 g of Zn-powder. A pretty decent effervescent reaction set in, along with that same faecal smell as before. This time, the solution neither went colourless (it became a greenish-yellow) nor clear (it stayed rather cloudy). It was left to react for 5 hours (got held up in an appointment) during which time the vessels’ contents lost 0.75 g of mass. It was then decanted and filtered. An amount of 1.75 g of zinc was recovered. My now empty reaction vessel smelled of perfume <sighs>.
The acidic, polar solution was transferred to a 100 ml separating funnel and was extracted with 3 x 10 ml of naphtha (to get rid of unreacted materials, specifically my fabric softener oils). The naphtha extracts were discarded and the now clean, but not entirely clear solution transferred to the larger separating funnel, where it was neutralized with 30% NaOH solution and brought to pH8.

Note: This was the original recipe; 30% lye. On retrospect, this is unworkably strong. I overshot the pH8 mark by a long way and had to re-acidify with acetic acid. Using a dropper, I could get it to pH8 again, but it proves far to fiddly for comfort. Better switch to 10% lye or less when approaching neutrality! This fuckup might also be the reason for what happened next:

This milky solution was extracted with 20 ml portions of naphtha. At the first portion, it became apparent that the dreaded “floating hydroxides” had returned: a white emulsion-layer at the surface consisting of naphtha, spice, water and Zn(OH)2 semi-solids. It will be dealt with as before. Persevere, and be patient: nothing is changed physically, only chemically. And this means that it’s reversible, not matter how big the fuckup. I apologize if the following paragraphs read more like a recipe than an account of observations, but this matter has been asked about so often in the forum, I thought this best. The volumes stated here are my volumes, yours will no doubt be different.

Cracking the emulsions
Basically, to separate any solvent from an emulsion that has formed, you use warmth, salt and mechanical means to split the mix into their constituents. Always try to get the bottom-‘clear’ in one beaker, the middle-‘muck’ in another, and the top-‘solvent’ in a third. Make sure the top and the bottom fractions are indeed clear. Everything not clear should go in the middle beaker, by definition. Adding heaps of salts to a polar/non-polar emulsion works wonders; it will make the polar part even more polar, forcing more non-polar solvent out of the emulsion. Don’t skimp on the salts, but never let the whole volume solidify. And never add salts to anything when it is in the separating funnel: you’ll just clog up your cock.

You need 4 beakers in addition to the separating funnel your problematic mix is in. Put 3 beakers in front of you, left – middle – right. I use these terms and positions to avoid confusion. Make the middle beaker a litre-sized one. Separate as much of the clear, watery solution at the bottom as possible and set aside in a separate fourth beaker for later. If there’s a small amount of white at the very bottom, put it in the centre beaker first. Put the floating white muck (about 40 ml) in the middle beaker. Any clear naphtha goes in the left beaker. You now have an empty separating funnel so put it aside for later.

Add several heaping teaspoons of anhydrous Na2CO3 to the middle beaker. Let it sink to the bottom, then stir and swirl vigorously. Warmth from the exothermic reaction, centrifugal force and the overload of salts separate out some of the naphtha, which is decanted into the small beaker on the left. Do not attempt to decant too much, or you’ll get too much emulsion in the left beaker with the naphtha. More soda is added to the middle, more swirling, more naphtha split off from the gel, decant into the left. Repeat this until you have about 75% ml of the naphtha thought to be in the mix (with a bit of emulsion) in the left, and a beaker in the middle with chunky soda-mud that won’t dissolve any further without adding more water. Add 50 ml of water to the middle mud and swirl for several minutes. Decant into the (up until now) empty right beaker. Add piping hot tap-water to centre beaker and dissolve rest of crystals. Add it all to the right beaker. Transfer this right beaker’s contents (clear water) to the separating funnel. Right beaker and middle beaker are now empty. Add 20 ml of naphtha to funnel and extract. Drain clear water portion-wise into right until a thick gel of naphtha and water remains. Swirl sep-funnel. This will dislodge some naphtha from the mix and put a few mm of clear liquid at the bottom of the funnel. Drain this clear liquid into the right beaker. If applicable, drain some of the emulsion in the centre beaker and do the heaping teaspoons and dissolving routine as earlier. Back to the separating funnel: swirl some more. Repeat. You are left with 20+ ml of naphtha over a few ml of thick emulsion/gel. Dump this in the left beaker.

You now have 40 ml of spice-containing naphtha and about 10 ml of semi-solid gel. Put gel together with right beakers’ contents PLUS the clear that was separated in the first step (it should milk up on you good) PLUS any other clear that you may or may not have in the big sep-funnel and re-extract with 20 ml of naphtha. Separation should proceed pretty normal now. Use the swirling technique to get a better separation, but only when there is just the gel left in the funnel; clear and muck should be in their respective beakers. Again, the mechanism at work here is centrifugal force together with friction on the glass. This is why it works best in a nice, rounded separating funnel shaped like a cone.

With all this sodium carbonate added, the pH of the solution should be 12 or higher by now. Extract using the above techniques as needed with 3 x 20 ml of naphtha. I should mention at this point that this is the first time EVER that I have seen yellow naphtha. Often it has been described here at the Nexus, but it has been a myth for me until now: PMS 108 FTW! I like the yellow spice better than the white, so far. No, I don’t have a dog.
2utjmzk.jpg

After drying I ended up with 77 g of naphtha, equalling about 120 ml. A bit too much for holding just 1 gram of spice. I let it evaporate in a large flat dish overnight to 48 g, or 75 ml. That went faster than I wished for! Small crystals could be seen on the bottom of the dish, meaning I should end up with about 0.75 g of spice, because that is the concentration it should start to crash out on me. Then again, all crystals can start forming from any rough edge on the glass’ surface, so I ‘m probably too optimistic here. At any rate, I wanted it all into solution again, so I warmed the dish au-bain-marie, dissolving the crystals. I transferred it, rinsing with fresh naphtha, to the freeze-beaker. It was 57,5 g or 90 ml. Perfect.
Still, it’s interesting to note that the solubility of DMT in naphtha at room-temperature is around the 10 g per litre-mark (could be more though). At freezing, this is reduced to 250 mg per litre maximum, as per my own findings. My Coleman-naphtha deposits >97.5% of it’s dissolved DMT in my freezer. Nice!
The beaker was first put into the fridge at 5 degrees for 8 hours, then into the freezer for 24 hours. What came out of that was an amount of large, quite yellow crystals (PMS 114) that were very easy to scrape out of the beaker once I decanted the naphtha, leaving hardly any smears. I got 0.52 g of crystal freebase, or 52 %. Let’s crunch these numbers: On average I recovered 82% of JJS as fumarates before. Of those fumarates, in process C, I recovered 66% as freebase in the form most valued by me personally. 66% of 82% is 54%. I got 52% in this JJS-to-freebase experiment, so I am inclined to say I got the same yield here. Which is nice. All this also means that whatever it is that produces this yellow colour:
a. It is organic,
b. It is not “converted” by Zn-reduction (hallelujah!),
c. It switches between salt/base form under the same circumstances as DMT does,
d. It is, like DMT, not decomposed by relatively strong acids or bases,
e. It makes up 5% or less of the total mass of the spice,
f. It is about equally soluble in naphtha as spice is.

The naphtha from the freezing was completely colourless whereas before it was a definite yellow PMS 108, meaning that all the yellow is now in the spice. Good or bad? Remains to be felt. I used this freeze-naphtha to dissolve any and all remains of spice in the beaker and on the tools I just used (a tablespoon, a teaspoon and an analytical spatula), and after evaporating it I was left with 35 mg of an amorphous mass that, alongside the strong spice-smell, very vaguely smelt of my dreaded softener (hello darkness my old friend…).

When I think back on it, I think there was a unique moment in time, the moment the spice just came out of the freezer and was air-drying, when I could have done something about the colour: It’s possible that for a minute or so, the ‘colour’ was liquid while the spice was not. I could swear I could see the colour drain from a few of the agglomerations of crystals into their neighbouring crystals by what looked to me like capillary action; the several ‘white’ clumps you see in the photograph. If I had let it drain on filter paper, they might have turned out more white, and I would have some of that mystery component concentrated in a piece of paper…. Next time, Gadget?

Bodymind: Holy shit! This went pretty deep. It had all the techno of white DMT, but with a more organic feel to it. What I especially liked, where the glimpses of completely different, realistic scenes that popped up for half a second at a time like small panels in a stained-glass window doing an “opening and closing the blinds”-effect. There were a lot of those, and I hope to one day penetrate that cell and really step into those scenes that so tentatively flash themselves to me. What I didn’t like however, were the body-shakes and the excessive yawning I got. I felt like a junkie in a cold-turkey abstention phase. The shakes went on and on in the end-phase of the trip, greatly disrupting the flow of it. And I wasn’t feeling cold, not consciously anyway. I yawned so much I felt my jaw was gonna crack. This was a very strong bodyload to carry, and I think I don’t like this spice because of it. I did however cry tears until my face was wet. And this I like. Also, because it was all so disrupting, I stood up and walked to the bathroom to get a glass of water. I looked absolutely fine in the mirror; I was even smiling while it didn’t feel like I was smiling. I also craved chocolate afterwards, and got me a bar of LoveChock (Dutch brand of organic cold-milled chocolate with nibs in it). These have a little message inside the package, like a Chinese fortune cookie. It read: “I overcome any fear with the power of my heart”. How true.. I ate the bar in 5 minutes.
Entities: None, unfortunately. The visuals too, were impersonal. But Very Beautiful.
Taste/appearance: Great taste, but the aftertaste was definitely ‘spicy’ in that it was like Capsaicin in mouth. That’s also why I went for that glass of water. Not entirely unpleasant, but very unexpected. The colour and texture of this spice was great! Very high density and a dream to handle.
Verdict: I am torn. On the one hand it is too much like my other Zn-reduced spice. But on the other hand it seems there are great things waiting to be discovered. I am just not sure I can handle a double-dose of these bodily effects.. I hope they stay at the same level when I double up a next time…

2yy34zl.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom