• Members of the previous forum can retrieve their temporary password here, (login and check your PM).

T. Macrogonus bioassayed = weaksauce

Migrated topic.
mew

mew

huachumancer
10 gram of base flesh consumed, not even on par with 100mg alkaloids
the rest was previously pulled with orange oil after bassified and trace alkaloids recovered, 100 mg between 2 feet (outter flesh included)

they looked promising and even had what look like salt xtals popping out of the flesh,
consumed after 22 hours fasting
t -11 no effects still


comparatively to swims foafs T bridgesii this was not worth any more investigation, however its possible i received 2 oddballs from the same odd mother plant void of desireable alkaloids,

LONG LIVE ACHUMA
 
i neglected to mention that some spines and the sourrounding flesh were added to the t macrogonus extraction just to be wasteless, i theorize this is where the small amount of alkaloids were from
 
Ipuma Ayar said:
10 gram of base flesh consumed, not even on par with 100mg alkaloids
the rest was previously pulled with orange oil after bassified and trace alkaloids recovered, 100 mg between 2 feet (outter flesh included)
Click to expand...

You weren't really expecting to get effects off of 10 grams of Macro flesh were you?:shock: Seems like your jumping to conclusions a bit too fast SWIM barely even gets effects off of 10 grams of top notch pedro flesh. Macro's only have about 0.5% mescaline in them, but they can be extracted, SWIM's done it plenty of times. How old were your pieces? Thickness? SWIM has 25 year old pieces with 5-6" diameters. Those pieces are definitely active. In the end though, it is somewhat of a waste of time to mess with the Macro's, especially when Pedro or Achuma's are so available. No sense in wasting all that time for an extraction for less material.

If you want effects, try eating about 60 grams of the flesh.

Love your quote though, definitely, "Long live Achuma"!
 
Macrogonus can be more active, its often mis id'd. In fact, there are peeps that don't consider it to be a true classification and lump them in with t peruvianus. I have read reports of it being awesome.

Has any one heard of t Glaucus? It's also lumped in with that group. I have one, but it has never been tested. Looks likenit would be the goodness.

A big fat cuzcoensis could look like a macrogonus and it's not active. It is damn pretty though. I had a big one that I bought as kk242 ( not the good one obviously) but I hacked it down, planted the tip and log propagated a chunk. The rest was not interesting. I wish I'd just let the GORGeOus plant grow. now I have a clump of tiny ones pupping from the bade. Thorny bastard.

To wrap this post up...

Your next Mac may be totally different. It's like buying p. Torch. There is much variety, keep digging and plant the tips. You can haves good one multiplying for the rest of your day.

Although there seems to be some extra special clones out there, I never read about dud achuma.

Long live achuma.... I 2nd that
 
typically 10 g of the achuma i prepare is enough to evoke "oh my god" after hours of silence from new comers
so if 10g were non pupil dilating, im through with that specific clone, and it was solid wood in the base of the core... so i can only assume it had aged a bit

this cat has HIGH standards, soon peyote will heard
 
yes 10 g dry

photo soon, im in the midst of copy all files to a server to backup not just the nexus but alot of pertinent info that still available on the web, i suggest you all do the same considering the recent acts against public internet
 
Back
Top Bottom