I just decided to try out a 3-day water fast for the first time.
I’d read Stephen Buhner’s excellent “The Transformative Power of Fasting” a while back, and now seemed a good time to try it.
It’s cold here, and I quickly got fed up of plain water, so I started to mix in some simple non-caffeine herbal teas: plain chamomile, hibiscus & lemon balm leaves, not the OTT packaged crap. Oh, and a sachet of 'Instant Cordyceps' which tasted amazingly savory...
Buhner includes teas as part of juice fasts, but not so far as I could tell, water fasts, and I was curious to know if they really “compromised” the power of a water-only fast.
Online, it was like stepping into the anti-Nexus! Many loud, fanatical, extreme-sounding types boldly declaring all sorts of hogwash, without the faintest attempt at supporting their sometimes bizarre assertions.
My position is that a tea is >99% water, with a minute amount of a large number of bio-compounds, and barely a single calorie of energy/carbs, if that… However, the general position of the hardcore seems to be that any tea ‘prevents’ the digestive system shutting down fully, but I really think they have no idea how the liver actually works.
I’m not a liver specialist either, but my take is that it’s essentially analogous to a CPU. It’s capable of around 500 functions, most of which usually relate to digestion, because that’s the usual source of the greatest number of inputs/threads. When you stop eating, this demand decreases, and it then has more resources to devote to other functions i.e. the ones described as the benefits of fasting. Against this background, a mug of tea, with a few milligrams of whatever, probably doesn’t hog the processor too much. I went for a bike-ride, put some sunscreen on, and probably swallowed a bit of dust, maybe even a bug or two. The sunscreen, dust and bugs would also find their way to my liver, and had I been purely water-fasting, would they have ‘activated’ my digestive system and thereby ‘invalidated’ the water fast?
To be clear, I can see how juice, with it’s sugar and carbs, prevents ketosis occurring, and really is a different ball-game, but tea, I’m not so sure…
Anyway, to sum up, the fast was much easier than I expected. I did think about food a fair bit, from time to time, but I didn’t get the angry physical pangs I was anticipating. I did seclude myself, which made things easier. Having just finished, I do feel recharged, and the minor illness I was dealing with seems to have taken a good kicking, so yeah, all in all, highly recommended. I would like to do a longer fast in future, but thought I’d try and get to the bottom of the tea-or-no-tea conundrum while it was all still fresh in my mind.
I’d be keen to hear any other thoughts on this…
Peace.
I’d read Stephen Buhner’s excellent “The Transformative Power of Fasting” a while back, and now seemed a good time to try it.
It’s cold here, and I quickly got fed up of plain water, so I started to mix in some simple non-caffeine herbal teas: plain chamomile, hibiscus & lemon balm leaves, not the OTT packaged crap. Oh, and a sachet of 'Instant Cordyceps' which tasted amazingly savory...
Buhner includes teas as part of juice fasts, but not so far as I could tell, water fasts, and I was curious to know if they really “compromised” the power of a water-only fast.
Online, it was like stepping into the anti-Nexus! Many loud, fanatical, extreme-sounding types boldly declaring all sorts of hogwash, without the faintest attempt at supporting their sometimes bizarre assertions.
My position is that a tea is >99% water, with a minute amount of a large number of bio-compounds, and barely a single calorie of energy/carbs, if that… However, the general position of the hardcore seems to be that any tea ‘prevents’ the digestive system shutting down fully, but I really think they have no idea how the liver actually works.
I’m not a liver specialist either, but my take is that it’s essentially analogous to a CPU. It’s capable of around 500 functions, most of which usually relate to digestion, because that’s the usual source of the greatest number of inputs/threads. When you stop eating, this demand decreases, and it then has more resources to devote to other functions i.e. the ones described as the benefits of fasting. Against this background, a mug of tea, with a few milligrams of whatever, probably doesn’t hog the processor too much. I went for a bike-ride, put some sunscreen on, and probably swallowed a bit of dust, maybe even a bug or two. The sunscreen, dust and bugs would also find their way to my liver, and had I been purely water-fasting, would they have ‘activated’ my digestive system and thereby ‘invalidated’ the water fast?
To be clear, I can see how juice, with it’s sugar and carbs, prevents ketosis occurring, and really is a different ball-game, but tea, I’m not so sure…
Anyway, to sum up, the fast was much easier than I expected. I did think about food a fair bit, from time to time, but I didn’t get the angry physical pangs I was anticipating. I did seclude myself, which made things easier. Having just finished, I do feel recharged, and the minor illness I was dealing with seems to have taken a good kicking, so yeah, all in all, highly recommended. I would like to do a longer fast in future, but thought I’d try and get to the bottom of the tea-or-no-tea conundrum while it was all still fresh in my mind.
I’d be keen to hear any other thoughts on this…
Peace.
