I understand the point of trying to use freedom of religion to bypass prohibition, but I don't know if the principles you propose fit with the idea of "Religion". You need a belief system in order to define a religion, and those principles are basically stating facts (psychedelics are tools, bad mental health and sociopathy do not get along with them, etc.) and declaring rights for the members. But there is no "belief" in a religious sense.

That's why the Native American Church or the Temple of the True Inner Light are religions, and besides the circumstances and reasons why every one of them was declared as such, it's difficult to reconcile a religious structure with the entheogenic experience. Entheogens give you a direct experience, middlemen are almost redundant.

So either you are belong to a cultural, historical community that might ask to be protected, or you declare a particular belief system. And if you do this, you're closing doors.

The other options, of course, are social clubs, foundations, research centers, etc...