More testing... This time i've copied the illustration in some 'BB Code' album created minutes ago, back to FireFox:
TWO differences:
- The « IMG » BB Code now has "width" & "height" parameters. The image is cut, not shrinked...
- The URL includes the string "thumbnail", while my previous thumbnail simulation did not.
I've got to wonder which one will pass the test of time.
So far it seems the "thumbnail" ain't much of a thumbnail at all if i set width to 800 and height to 430 (full-size):
Oh! Quite another type of thumbnail indeed.
Well, my objective is to adopt a revised text-formatting signature which doesn't only appear to be about having a free meal, since it's possible IMO to get some fair level of exposure and yet also create suitable incentive to register and stick around - if that's compatible with the board's own agenda, of course - and i bet it is.
Nice set of emoticons, by the way!
The effect i wanted should be more like this:
The funny thing is that the "thumbnail" string just disapeared from the URL again. Edited using MS-Edge, just in case...
Back to the font size test:
This is #0
This is #1
This is #2
This is #3
This is #4
This is #5
This is #6
This is #7
0 to 5 look the same. Could there be interference by the "push notifications" permission? Or what about JAVA/JAVAScript, etc?...
Hows that one below? Setting width to 160 and height to 86:
A thumbnail of the 3rd kind...
Good day, have fun!