^^ I would like to discuss this a little bit more please.

First, when one says something has no limits, it's because that person doesn't know the objective limits. For example, my bedroom has limits... but I haven't seen the limits of the universe... so I assume it's infinite. Other example would be the life-span. I know that the life of my physical body is limited... but I don't know when Time began or if it is going to end... so I assume it's eternal. So, saying that something is limitless is always an assumption based on ignorance. Pretty much like when religious people talk about God as an infinite and omnipotent being that is the Big Boss of the Universe, and still not knowing the 'limits' of the Universe (which otherwise would give them a little more credibility). This so-called 'God' could be just the imaginary manager of the restaurant (known space) which we know could be just a part of the unknown city, metaphorically speaking.

So, do you agree that Hyperspace, the Physical Universe and Time seem Infinite because there is no evidence of their finiteness, and not because there is evidence of their infiniteness? And that saying that something has no limits cannot be more than an assumption based on the ignorance of such limits?