1) Define your meaning of ‘UFO’. There is a high possibility of misinterpretation due to the many connotations associated with the term.
2) Define ‘Paganism’. Are you upholding the traditional Christian opinion toward Paganism?
3) Define ‘Demons’.
Please elaborate? Can you provide examples of these “age-old demonological phenomenon” so that we too can attempt to draw comparisons.
Why do you think that? Again, an example would be nice.
How have you concluded that entities interact with quantum particles, what are the solid grounds for this conclusion?
What is your definition of ‘supernatural’? Have you looked into the behaviour of subatomic particles?
It is all well and good to select people who support your argument, but it is also ideal to consider those who don’t. Look at both those you support and oppose and construct an argument weighing up the validity of both the approaches.
Why have you selected these quotes? What are they in reference to in the argument as a whole?
Upon what grounds has Strieber drawn this conclusion? It’s a sweeping statement.
Never overestimate or underestimate your audience. You are on a forum dedicated to entheogenic use. I am sure many people are aware of Sadhu monks and their relationship with marajuana.
What is your meaning of ‘demon’?
‘Sorceress potion’…feminised? What is you purpose behind the use of that word? What are its ‘cultural applications…occult purposes and pharmacological properties?’
What do you mean by UFO? An ‘unidentified flying object’? I fail to see what an unknown object in the sky has to do with drug use?
And, yes there are similarities between the ‘alien abduction experience’ and the folklore of ‘fairy abduction’. The only difference being the time context and time interpretation
and…? You need to provide further explanation on this, what do you make of this quote?
Again, I fail to see what this has to do with drug use, UFO’s or Christianity.
That is one sentence! Where is the evidence for this statement? Not everyone draws that conclusion, not everyone has a terrifying encounter.
I say thanks for splitting the argument into small paragraphs to make it easy to read…
But, in full honesty this is a very disjointed and hard to understand argument. There are a lot of open ended statements which are not backed up with evidence. If you want us to be convinced of your argument, evidence and quotes are your best friend.
My question to you; what was the purpose of this post? What were you aiming to achieve?