Members of the previous forum can retrieve their temporary password here, (login and check your PM).

Reply to thread

Message

That paper looks and sounds good. That fact that it lists a low MAC-value whilst no negative biological effects have been observed, ever, looks like another bureaucratic canard so abundant in the E.U.!
Still, I'd say change it often and try a dry-fire with a suction-pump first. But maybe I'm just overly-cautious. Hell, I smoked tobacco for 28 years so if *anything* is going to give me cancer, it probably won't be these fibers.
Good job in finding out about it!

edit: Oh.. I see.. you scrape first. Got a mix-up with a GVG-thing someone did. So no dry fires

[QUOTE="TmC47, post: 3505847, member: 709"] That paper looks and sounds good. That fact that it lists a low MAC-value whilst no negative biological effects have been observed, ever, looks like another bureaucratic canard so abundant in the E.U.! Still, I'd say change it often and try a dry-fire with a suction-pump first. But maybe I'm just overly-cautious. Hell, I smoked tobacco for 28 years so if *anything* is going to give me cancer, it probably won't be these fibers. Good job in finding out about it! edit: Oh.. I see.. you scrape first. Got a mix-up with a GVG-thing someone did. So no dry fires :) [/QUOTE]