elphologist1
Rising Star
If you've read Stan Grof, he says that psychedelics first allow us to work through issues caused by early personal experiences. After these issues are resolved, the psychedelics user then addresses perinatal (life and death) issues. But then after all these are addressed, I am unclear as to what the final state is. Is it bliss free from psychological hangups? Does personal growth continue beyond this point, and if so, how?
It seems that prominent psychedelics users reach states after long-term use that are very distinct between individuals, and not always positive. Take Timothy Leary, for example. Despite presumably many instances of ego death, it seemed to me that he still had plenty of psychological hangups late in life (for example, need for attention and the approval of others). Richard Alpert did reach what appears to be a much better integrated state, but he does not credit this exclusively to psychedelic drugs. In fact, he describes in his book Be Here Now how he was never able to maintain the insights he had under psychedelics once he "came down", despite various creative approaches such as deliberately staying high for over a week at a time. Presumably he gained some of this later through mysticism, yet he admits in his speeches that its still very much an ongoing process even after all these years. Then you could look at a shaman, or perhaps someone like Stan Grof or Albert Hoffman and think that they have worked through all their personal issues and are now free to help others in an unbiased way. But is this really the case, or do these people really still have most of the hangups that a non-user would have at a similar age?
Personally, do you have a long-term goal in terms of hoped for personal growth through psychedelics use? How do you feel your progress has been so far?
Elphologist
It seems that prominent psychedelics users reach states after long-term use that are very distinct between individuals, and not always positive. Take Timothy Leary, for example. Despite presumably many instances of ego death, it seemed to me that he still had plenty of psychological hangups late in life (for example, need for attention and the approval of others). Richard Alpert did reach what appears to be a much better integrated state, but he does not credit this exclusively to psychedelic drugs. In fact, he describes in his book Be Here Now how he was never able to maintain the insights he had under psychedelics once he "came down", despite various creative approaches such as deliberately staying high for over a week at a time. Presumably he gained some of this later through mysticism, yet he admits in his speeches that its still very much an ongoing process even after all these years. Then you could look at a shaman, or perhaps someone like Stan Grof or Albert Hoffman and think that they have worked through all their personal issues and are now free to help others in an unbiased way. But is this really the case, or do these people really still have most of the hangups that a non-user would have at a similar age?
Personally, do you have a long-term goal in terms of hoped for personal growth through psychedelics use? How do you feel your progress has been so far?
Elphologist