I have no objection to people making and believing metaphysical claims, or relating perceptions, theories or thoughts upon such matters.

I just see it as a waste of time and energy for myself to argue about such things or to bother entertaining others in terms of them.

Some incredibly intelligent people have supernatural beliefs as well as experiences or perceptions.

I've even had experiences that might be described as supernatural, however I can't really make any claims about them because they cannot be investigated and in terms of unproven supernatural claims there is a potentially infinite set, but in terms of pragmatic and demonstrable claims that can be investigated at any given time there is always a finite set.

To share some term definitions, when I write of a scientific ontology this refers to Ontology as it is defined in Information Science as opposed to the branch of metaphysical philosophy called ontology, which is essentially rooted in the prehistoric superstitions of our species in relation to early civilization. I see that material as part of the primitive foundation upon which later science was built when our species transitioned from seeing the world as a supernatural product of supernatural beings to seeing it as a natural product that is formed by natural means. 

Along these lines I view the large hadron collider and physics as more informative about the nature of reality than Ouija boards are.

I am one of those people, perhaps out of place in terms of the online psychedelic community, who believes that this computer I am typing on is a product of investigative science and not supernatural coincidence. Our species employed superstition and supernatural concepts to explain reality for thousands of years and it did not give rise to things like technology or advanced scientific knowledge about how things came to be and are as they are. I have no objection to people who want to dwell in what I believe to be primitive superstition, but I have no use for such world views.

On the other hand, I see psychological insight as incredibly useful and able to give rise to practical approaches to self improvement.

However it is worth noting that my primary point is not my ontological perspective but is rather the idea that the accuracy or truth of a claim or perception cannot be determined by the comfort or discomfort that we feel in relation to it.