barkbee
Rising Star
So what is your plan or what was it when you first tried DMT?
TL/DR
I barged in here promising transparency.
So, I'll spit some out.
I have yet to try DMT and I am scared-shitless. (it appears to be a healthy response to how others have interpreted the experience)
I think that 'shit-less' is actually the DSM.xxx term for it.
Its the last remaining one that I am aware of to try.
I am also as excited as I have ever been for an experience.
But I have punched my ticket for this ride and am working through ground school
Part of my job was with Health Canada trying to forecast the proliferation of research chemicals before they landed so I was pretty much ahead of the curve until 2018.
The goal was to arm any ER MD with some way for GC-MS to positively identify any potentially problematic Research Chemical in the pipeline so that best practice treatment protocols can be developed in advance.
We were never very worried about psychedelics in particular as a class.
(but had a hopeful eye on this site for many years and think it is incredible.)
Fun Fact:
Researchers don't call them RC's, they are referred to as NPS's: novel psychoactive substances.
I am retired from a career focused on addiction and mental health.
I have done both research and clinical work.
I am also an evangelical proponent of decriminalizing everything and educating.
Having retired I can finally tell my former boss at CAMH,:
Yes, sir. I really did some very personal research.
Conclusion: ?
Some of this shit is probably magical.
By Asimov's definition some RC's definitively qualify.imho
So my personal drug strategy has always been to try 'to try' everything but ONLY after investing time (sometimes decades) to control as many variables and risks as known.
But this has not been the experience of my peers. (many of whom have only explored the world of wine coolers after college.)
bb
TL/DR
I barged in here promising transparency.
So, I'll spit some out.
I have yet to try DMT and I am scared-shitless. (it appears to be a healthy response to how others have interpreted the experience)
I think that 'shit-less' is actually the DSM.xxx term for it.
Its the last remaining one that I am aware of to try.
I am also as excited as I have ever been for an experience.
But I have punched my ticket for this ride and am working through ground school
Part of my job was with Health Canada trying to forecast the proliferation of research chemicals before they landed so I was pretty much ahead of the curve until 2018.
The goal was to arm any ER MD with some way for GC-MS to positively identify any potentially problematic Research Chemical in the pipeline so that best practice treatment protocols can be developed in advance.
We were never very worried about psychedelics in particular as a class.
(but had a hopeful eye on this site for many years and think it is incredible.)
Fun Fact:
Researchers don't call them RC's, they are referred to as NPS's: novel psychoactive substances.
I am retired from a career focused on addiction and mental health.
I have done both research and clinical work.
I am also an evangelical proponent of decriminalizing everything and educating.
Having retired I can finally tell my former boss at CAMH,:
Yes, sir. I really did some very personal research.
Conclusion: ?
Some of this shit is probably magical.
By Asimov's definition some RC's definitively qualify.imho
So my personal drug strategy has always been to try 'to try' everything but ONLY after investing time (sometimes decades) to control as many variables and risks as known.
But this has not been the experience of my peers. (many of whom have only explored the world of wine coolers after college.)
bb