The boldified part was mainly directed at criminals like the ones who administered the OP. I don't think the Nexus needs to be reminded about harm reduction.

The "trippers licence" model seems good, but who is the governing body responsible for this? If it were a non-gov organisation, the amount of legal bullshit required for approval would be enormous. If they were a governmental department, that in itself is concerning.

I think the first gargantuan task is dissolving the stigma associated with psychedelics. This is kinda counter intuitive, since a large portion of that stigma is associated with the "hippie movement" and its nomenclature. Terms like "trips", "dropping tabs" and even "psychedelic". We already use "experiences", "ingesting" and "entheogenic". This would be futile, unless everyone jumps on board. Something tells me a certain group won't be compliant. *ahem* shroomery *ahem*

The rationale for this point comes from a colleague of mine, who is very involved with the nearly budding legal cannabis industry in Australia (sorry for the pun). According to him, the only reason why the government was willing to accept him, or even listen to him for that matter, was because he deliberately refrained from using "stoner words".