a1pha said:
Seraph - Cut the attitude.
Izzy - This seems to be your first post at the DMT-Nexus. Please understand many of us here strive for harm reduction and without some background/understanding of your goals/intentions you will find people hesitant to give you answers regarding IV/IM.
Strassman clearly provides appropriate doses in his Dose-Response study. I suggest you read it.
-a1pha
a1pha Thank you for the study. Read it. Problem with the study is he only used two active doses, .2 and .4 mg/kg.
To start the study, all twelve subjects received .04 mg/kg which was generally regarded as a placebo by the subjects, and .4 mg/kg (the maximum study dose) on separate days.
Then they did the next phase of the study where the subjects received saline, .05 mg/kg, .1 mg/kg (the subjects didn't like this because all body-buzz), .2 mg kg and .4 mg/kg.
That's it, he never tested .25, .3, .35 mg/kg or above .4mg/kg in this study.
The three subjects who had smoked DMT free base agreed IV effects were more overwhelming and rapid in onset.
It's kind of an old study, from 1994, the language has come a long way since then. It's dose/response right, but basically just off or on, with little in between. Good for the time.
Oh yeah, Fumaric acid is 116 gm/mol and Strassman was basing his dosing on DMT-fumarate (304 gm/mol) Since DMT-freebase is 188 gm/mol and SWIM was basing his dosing on 18 mg of freebase, that would equate to 29 mg of DMT-fumarate. Which means SWIM took 0.32 mg/kg equivalent of the fumarate.
I may be off by +/- a few percent, but it's close enough for SWIM.
SWIM may have met Strassman 10 or 15 years ago. Didn't know he was doing this research then.