I found 2C-C fairly subtle but highly enjoyable. It's very friendly for conversation or a small get together type of environment. Psychedelic, but easy on the head and very functional. Would recommend.
Despite Sasha's labelling of "psychedelic tofu", 2C-D is a gem of a psychedelic in own right. It's pretty similar to 2C-C in that it's fairly subtle and pretty functional but I'd class it as a bit heftier. Less social and moar introspective in the way of a true psychedelic, it's better suited to an evening in but manageable enough for an evening out. It's worth noting the higher dosage of this one compared to most of the others in the 2C class. It's also worth noting that a lower dose (25mg) gave a Navajo friend of mine a full breakthrough insectoid hyperspace experience lasting about 6 hours, whereas myself and many others that have experienced it found it fairly mild even at higher doses (75mg), it seems individual/genetic sensitivities can vary quite a bit on this one, so its a good idea to work up slowly. Also on the would recommend list.
2C-E is heavy stuff. Extremely visual, highly introspective/truly psychedelic. Very strong medicine. It's not very pleasant though and I'd say you really aren't missing much in passing this one over. It's worth exploring once or twice for the intrepid psychonaut, but for all it's intensity, it doesn't really have a lot of depth or redeeming value, imo. I believe Sasha said of this one, something on the order of: "I don't think I like it, but I intend to explore it again. There is something here that rewards the user". I took it over and over and over again at every imaginable dosage looking for that reward and I never found it. I just plain don't like it. I'd put it on the try it once if it's offered, but don't bother pursuing it list.
2C-P sucks. Just plain sucks. Don't bother. Would not recommend.
4-AcO-DMT is a superior entheogen. One of the few research chemicals that has the depth and breadth of the classical psychedelics. If you only got one on this list, this is the one. Lovely, lovely, stuff. Stock up on this one. :thumb_up:
Regretfully I have not had the opportunity to encounter 4-HO-MET, but based on the reports of others, I'd put it second on the list right behind the 4-AcO-DMT. This one seems to be a real winner and worthy of some dedicated exploration.
All those synthetic stimulants: the cathinones and amphetamine analogues and such are not worth your time. Addictive, dangerous, and detrimental to your overall health and well being. This is just a nasty class of substances. Strongly advise to stay far away from these ones.
Dissociatives can be fun, but there isn't a lot of depth there to pursue them as anything more than a novelty. If you choose to explore these I'd say try a very small amount a handful of times (well spaced out between sessions) and then let them go. These things are insidious and will quickly take control if you let them.
The 4-AcO-DMT is absolutely worth pursuing over the long term. I expect the 4-HO-MET is probably has some good potential for recurring exploration as well, it's certainly a worthy candidate. The 2C-C and 2C-D are worth exploring deeply, but they don't really have the depth for continuous exploration. Once you've run the dosage gamut with them a couple times there isn't really much moar there to pursue. The 2C-E, 2C-P, 3-MeO-PCE, and 3-MeO-PCP overall probably aren't worth your time, but if your interested in the novelty there isn't too much harm in trying them 2 or 3 times just to see what they are about. You're certainly not missing out on anything if you skip em over. The stimulants are a huge waste of time, don't even bother with those.
Just my thoughts/experience. All the best. Let me know how that 4-HO-MET treats ya.
![Winking face :wink: 😉](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/nexus/unicode/64/1f609.png)