• Members of the previous forum can retrieve their temporary password here, (login and check your PM).

A counter cartography of the modern world

Sometimes in the u.s. they literally don't follow regulations in practice. So too does industry standard set goals and fail. (or not act to produce any result). We're also all impulsive and there's driven emotional immaturity (see Adult Children of emotionally immature parents by Lindsay C Gibson) you can be an exec, doc, tech wiz, have the degree and still be emotionally immature which does affect judgement and decision psychology

[Note: the idea for me is to just bootleg wind energy and quit stalling; it seems like stalling is a good technique and works with impatience which most people are a little impatient like every kind of person you meet has that in them innate. you can build a mini wind turbine and people themselves can do that en mass and if done well through amateur research it would work better than anything the government, the industry, or a scientist can propose because of the inability to make cognizant sound decision with all the choice paralysis]

1) what if we found out or researched proper training practice to teach the skills required to build your own systems? Like wind.
2) what if we considered how to make these smaller operations the most efficient as we can; possible? like a working functional system that separates a neglected population from the cruel conditions they live in? I'm not posing questions like "what if it doesn't work forever?" ... One action rather than reaction that people can take to ensure they have the energy they need to run their lives. We depend on energy and electricity and harness it and put that to use. People live without it and if you will; that does cut them out from opportunity. So many people for instance are homeless in the u.s. and so many walk the streets. There is such a huge population of homelessness that they will form tent cities. Like a city of people living in nothing but a tent in LA. They also bus these people out into another town because they're u.s. citizens and cannot be deported cross country (unlike a heap of trash you can't just dump it somewhere like chile or another country that's apparently no one's problem where people starve every day and don't matter

[note: despite conversation derailment I'm getting good ideas]
 
Last edited:
Alright, now what also about pharma? how does pharmaceuticals become a clear misuse of technology and a division and capture of resource? Of power?
 
Alright, now what also about pharma? how does pharmaceuticals become a clear misuse of technology and a division and capture of resource? Of power?
That is a crucial question. On the one hand, pharmacological expertise in quality control, drug development, and efficient synthesis is immensely valuable to society as a whole. On the other hand, the profit motive corrupts everything, to put it really briefly.
 
the idea for me is to just bootleg wind energy and quit stalling
If that works for you, then go for it. In areas where planning permission becomes an issue, it may not be so simple.

Also, you have to take into account the fact that the wind doesn't always blow when you need it to, nor does it stop blowing when you don't need it. What I'm getting at here is that energy storage becomes a part of the equation - unless you're willing to restrict your electricity usage to the times when the wind is blowing (which may well be most of the time, depending on your location) and/or you don't mind your wind turbine being a waste of resources if you're not able to utilise it fully.

There's also the matter of building it sufficiently robustly that it doesn't injure you or anyone else through failure in normal use, as well as making sure that all the electrics that you attach to it are safe as well.

All this may be obvious, but experience has shown me that it's usually best to state the obvious in certain situations.
 
Alright, now what also about pharma? how does pharmaceuticals become a clear misuse of technology and a division and capture of resource? Of power?
It's way more complex than just pointing a simple finger at some institutes and play the blame game.

With my projects I have been involved with several pharmaceutical companies over the years (some of them open science and some non-profits) and they all have to deal with very complex dillemas and issue's. A lot of promising medicines for example do not make it through the final phase III trials in the end, that is an incredible amount of time lost (easily 10-15 years) and besides the amount of fortune wasted it has this devastating demoralizing effects on those people who gave all they got for finding a cure to help other people.

Then also with these new inventive initatives in medicine compensation with certain governments they get incentives to be able to create a truely single cure medicine that they can then ask a lot of money for (governments will take into account the quality of life that this improves on the average person, and how that in return gives back a healthy person to the society, all to calculate the price such medicine is worth it, and its high!). So that means that this enables these companies to financially create a true single cure, instead of a medicine that you have to take for the rest of your life including all its side effects until you die. Hepatitis C cure is a good example of that practice.

Also think about the activist stock buyers/crowdfunding that are taking place were the activists buy a significant stock percentage into a company so they can put certain items on the agenda of that company.

And that's already happening:


There is still quite some work to do, but this brings the first signs of realistic hope on the horizon. 😊

Power to the people! 💪


Kind regards,

The Traveler
 
Conspiracy Theories do not belong on the public forum, please respect that.

OK. What are you specifically claiming is CT about my post?

Government Secrecy Orders on Patents Have Stifled More Than 5,000 Inventions

Invention Secrecy Act of 1951

US navy synthesizes jet fuel solely out of seawater
 
Government Secrecy Orders on Patents Have Stifled More Than 5,000 Inventions
True, due to vital national interests. Nothing wrong here, you do not want to advertise your newest military patents to the enemy.

Invention Secrecy Act of 1951
Same as the one before.

US navy synthesizes jet fuel solely out of seawater
Never viable due to the incredible energy input needed to get the fuel out. Same issue as with hydrogen. It's just the same demonstrator ad for electrolysis: highly inefficient. And that car running on water has now been debunked ad nauseous. CT pur sang.

Also setting up the infrastructure is way too costly and too vulnerable for war times.

So they both make for exiting stories but the first ones are just a sensible thing to do and the other one is just simple physics preventing real life use.


Kind regards,

The Traveler
 
Sometimes in the u.s. they literally don't follow regulations in practice. So too does industry standard set goals and fail. (or not act to produce any result). We're also all impulsive and there's driven emotional immaturity (see Adult Children of emotionally immature parents by Lindsay C Gibson) you can be an exec, doc, tech wiz, have the degree and still be emotionally immature which does affect judgement and decision psychology

[Note: the idea for me is to just bootleg wind energy and quit stalling; it seems like stalling is a good technique and works with impatience which most people are a little impatient like every kind of person you meet has that in them innate. you can build a mini wind turbine and people themselves can do that en mass and if done well through amateur research it would work better than anything the government, the industry, or a scientist can propose because of the inability to make cognizant sound decision with all the choice paralysis]

1) what if we found out or researched proper training practice to teach the skills required to build your own systems? Like wind.
2) what if we considered how to make these smaller operations the most efficient as we can; possible? like a working functional system that separates a neglected population from the cruel conditions they live in? I'm not posing questions like "what if it doesn't work forever?" ... One action rather than reaction that people can take to ensure they have the energy they need to run their lives. We depend on energy and electricity and harness it and put that to use. People live without it and if you will; that does cut them out from opportunity. So many people for instance are homeless in the u.s. and so many walk the streets. There is such a huge population of homelessness that they will form tent cities. Like a city of people living in nothing but a tent in LA. They also bus these people out into another town because they're u.s. citizens and cannot be deported cross country (unlike a heap of trash you can't just dump it somewhere like chile or another country that's apparently no one's problem where people starve every day and don't matter

[note: despite conversation derailment I'm getting good ideas]
Thinking more broadly about social structures, economics and environmental impacts, the work of Helena Norberg-Hodge may prove to be of interest to you - you'd definitely want to read her book, Ancient Futures for perspectives on sustainability and the influence of corporate culture on natural systems - particularly those including people.

But "Fossil fuel" is not made from and never has been made from fossils as we have been told. Petroleum is also not a "non renewable resource" as we have also falsely been told. Think of Petroleum like blood in a human, if you take a pint of blood from a human the living body will work to rebuild and reproduce that missing pint until the system has the correct amount or balance of blood. Petroleum is like the blood or lubricant of the Earth and Earth does slowly replenish the supply of Petroleum once extracted. The challenge lies in knowing what the balance point is and living within that balance point.

My belief is that we as a species are about to go back to extracting energy from Aether and a lot of technologies for energy production which have been hidden and suppressed from us will soon be revealed and rolled out. The sooner the better for all of us.
I should have addressed this one earlier, although @The Traveler already did to some extent. Although abiogenetic petroleum is known to occur to a certain extent, its overall significance is decidedly limited. While hydrocarbons undoubtedly do occur in objects of cosmological origin, it's unwise to extend an analogy to the surface layers of the earth, where living organisms have been at work for the best part of four billion (four thousand million) years.

Wouldn't burning abiogenetic fossil fuels be even worse than using the stuff from anaerobic decomposition of biological material? It would be releasing carbon into the atmosphere that was deeply sequestered in comparison to the biotic petroleum nearer the surface.
 
Everyone: the point isn't to explain conspiracy i'm writing a literal book. (I'm also tom sawyering all of you into putting up info for research lol that's truth but i'm aaalso adding the book here for what its worth to laugh about in rough draft or to literally not take it serious as being important philosophical, scientific, and holistic questions to ask I'm not an expert in the field but an amateur and that doesn't discredit writing and publishing opinion and fact checked information and what i think about it. ALSO yes, all the things i've mentioned literally are parasitic-like and enslavement-like and its a good sense of philosophy y'all. I'm linking to a conversatiion on conspiracy y'all) (scroll down directly to the link)

I'm referencing a book on sexual assault and the credibility discount (a real and terrible tactic law firms and lawyers use in defending their clients) used in court to discredit survivors. The book relates to how we discredit, ok?.. Not the substance of it but the many ideas it exposes you to helps you to understand the credibility complex.
(see Credible) (Here is an AI Generated response.....)

Overview
“Credible: Why We Doubt Accusers and Protect Abusers” is a book written by Deborah Tuerkheimer, a former prosecutor, legal expert, and leading authority on sexual violence. The book examines why we are primed to disbelieve allegations of sexual abuse and how we can transform a culture and legal system structured to dismiss accusers.
Key Points
  • The book highlights the importance of understanding credibility and how our perceptions of it are distorted by false assumptions and hidden biases embedded in our culture, legal system, and psyches.
  • Tuerkheimer argues that we need to shift our approach to belief and create a path forward to ensuring justice for individuals affected by sexual misconduct.
  • The book shares the stories of many sexual misconduct survivors and explores the research process of gathering these stories.
  • The author makes the argument that it’s not just about believing that the abuse took place, but also about believing that the abuse matters and that we’re going to do something about it.
Reviews
  • “Credible is an extraordinary book. Victim credibility - or lack of attributed credibility - is one of the most stressful elements one experiences when stumbling blindly through the justice system. It’s so important to understand what’s happening (credibility dismissal) so that you can enter the process with more confidence.”
  • “This is not just an important book. It’s way more than that—it’s a new algorithm, an upending of long-held beliefs kept in place by law and culture. As I read the case studies about victims of sexual assault and harassment, I felt my own baked-in assumptions being rewired. Credible changed me from the inside out.”
Awards and Recognition
  • “Credible” has been recognized as one of the most anticipated nonfiction books of Fall 2021 by Bibliolifestyle and Ms. Magazine.
  • The book has been praised by Elizabeth Lesser, bestselling author and member of Oprah Winfrey’s Super Soul 100, as a book that “changed her from the inside out.”
AI-generated answer. Please verify critical facts. Learn more

(conversations on conspiracy theories below)

ALSO also Podcast Episode: So You Think You’re A Critical Thinker This is "So you think you're a critical thinker" an episode of the Electronic Frontier Foundation podcast "how to fix the internet" and it invites Alice E. Marwick she wrote "The Private is Political: Networked Privacy and Social Media" and while not the topic of the EFF's episode "So you think you're a critical thinker" it does deal with how conspiracy theories form out of communities who are by no means represented by the government, private sector, and by those who are just trying to figure it out but aren't able to and so they form their guesses and compile them into a cluster of ideas of which don't apply to reality (i.e. Qanon, Pizzagate, mannergate, etcetera the great replacement theory blahblahbalah eugenics and other stuff; stuff like that lol)

But please understand too i'm serious about my questioning and i'm willing to put the final draft through the editing process so :whistle::geek::confused:

I want to put up a framework of looking at things holistically and this is a idk creative non fiction book? It's not going to make really wild shifts in final draft form the internet is already good at it so it'll do that for me and in which case if i did get to publish it it'll sell. The real question is: is it going to actually provide the reader with information? How much gets culled and kept in the final draft? What publisher do I go through as to protect and balance the threshold of censorship and good genuinely caring editorial review?

Also with wikipedia anyone can change it. Mods might watch the wiki page they may not either or they may not have staffing to. It's super useful for disinformation so y'all no wiki's. This is close enough to a wiki i mean I can reedit all my posts if I wanted but I'm going to try to edit it to be engaging
 
Last edited:
I wanted to add too: have any of you TRIED to get your hands on a good hydrocarbon cam? It's veeeeery expensive and you pretty much have to rent them or pay 60 grand. You basically cannot as a regular citizen go around taking video that captures hydrocarbons because you need the hardware AND software. (With that said though; it would be cool to get more people access to hydrocarbon cameras that do not require software, for instance. Public awareness is key, education is also key, and treating your mentally ill and disabled with dignity is key because so much of conspiracy theory gets to people and does brainwash them because these are the people in life without a lot of hope for their futures; like, hell with gradual but incisive action (and without stalling it) it probably would transform the world over just through getting real decisive regulations)

Hydrocarbon cameras and the software used to analyze what kind of leaks are going on around you aren't even available to public.

There's an example right there of a conspiracy theory just waiting to be formed...... but it's up to us to have the impulse control to avoid making it a conspiracy theory, to fight against turning into a CT or a conspiracy theorist, and also if there's facts and truth included you gotta at least admit to factual understanding. It's up to people to have the impulse control to avoid forming up a cult too and because of improper regulations in various government's it's complicated and some places probably have cults springing up left and right (idk i honestly don't)

(see "Cults inside out: how people get in and can get out" by Rick Alan Ross)
 
Last edited:
I also want to add JUST like with the book "Dirty Work" that Eyal Press wrote; simply put I do not offer up any solution to lives. I cannot solve problems because that's not my responsibility. I only implore you all to consider the value in conceptualizing a philosophy book. Traveler I actually truly appreciate your transparency here in being open about your background and in the pros and cons of producing pharmaceuticals. That certainly isn't my job and I do not intend to spend 10 to 15 years, a billion to trillion dollars, and throw it all away- this if a pharma or oil P.I. (private investigator; see u.s. laws with P.I. since i'm based in the U.S. as a citizen) wants to know what my business is- its to write opinion and other people can take the opinion and understand it or not. this isn't to say I'm an expert nor to say that I cannot write a damn book and get help from people online wanting to help with the project. It's got a lot of potential in other fields in the discipline of academia. I know for one there are a lot of people that do not want to connect the view that the industry standard is this clean beautiful "garden of eden" paradise- and they honestly can suck lemons and they can spend money and whatever. The response to a single person writing a book; an over response or over reaction is like... I just shake my head. It's not necessary and it could be that a better system with more capacity to improve the world arises through autonomy of being able to
 
Back
Top Bottom