Hi,
My enquiry is mainly to determine whether stronger effects than the ones I had are possible (and, whether pursuing them is meaningful for me, but that's of course a personal decision).
Preliminarily, based on earlier exchanges in the chat section, I think it would be useful to suggest what I consider an approach to this discussion, likely to yield us the right results. I think it's useful to differentiate between first-order effects and second-order. So, first-order effects are the direct effects of dmt. The second-order effects are our reactions to first-order effects. Second-order effects are partly influenced by our doctrines, past personal experiences, our psycho-neurological make-up, etc.
Of course, a psychoactive drug can trigger and influence multiple orders of reactions in the brain, even with enough strength so that it exceeds the typical extent of self-regulation. Nevertheless, it is important to make the distinction between first and second order effects, because I think there's definitely some feedback between our mindset and our reaction to the effects of the drug. For example, someone who is predisposed in life to religious/mystical experiences, might state that an "overwhelming sense of paradisiatic awe or magic" is one of the stronger effects of dmt. However, this tells us more about the mindset of the person, than about dmt. To me personally, my reaction to first-order effects was amusement, I found the effects overall comical. Since everyone is different, the reaction to first-order effects will vary from person to person, and therefore second-order effects are definitely an interesting area to explore, but unfortunately not the objective of this forum thread. Here I'm hoping to exchange notes about the first-order effects of the drug.
One final preliminary is the caveat that, of course, a lot about the first-order effects cannot easily be described. After all, dmt is a serotonergic psychedelic: it works by being similar enough to serotonin for neurones to mistake it as that; but because of the differences, it is difficult to recall the effects after they end, and to find the right words for a description. On the other hand, I believe we can still define different levels of effects, using minimal descriptions. For example, there is clearly a very low effect, when there is slight euphoria. Then a stronger level, when the visual effects appear, but only as 2D. Then another level, when the plane opens up in 3D, etc. My question is if there is a stronger level of effects than the one I will describe below.
When the effects were in full swing, my body was anaesthetised. I had a sleep mask and ear plugs on, so the stimuli during the effects originated only in my imagination, I wasn't responding at all to my external environment. I think this minimalistic setting was more practical for my objective to determine the different effect levels.
My body (i.e, I) pictured involuntarily a moving 3D plane overlaid with detailed, intricate, changing patterns. I also pictured a lot of activity and movement in the 3D plane, the activity involving the geometrical patterns that overlaid the plane. And I pictured the impression of interactions, and the part of the mind that responds to verbal communication was definitely engaged (this is, I think, what other people refer to as "meeting entities" ). There was a distinct feeling that it was "right" for the brain to react to those stimuli. My musical thinking was also active, I was working out melodic motifs and rhythms in my imagination.
Do you think first-order effects stronger than this are possible? Could you describe them?
Thanks
P.S.: After typing this, I read a number of essays on this forum about "hyper slap" black-outs, and the effects described seemed stronger.
My enquiry is mainly to determine whether stronger effects than the ones I had are possible (and, whether pursuing them is meaningful for me, but that's of course a personal decision).
Preliminarily, based on earlier exchanges in the chat section, I think it would be useful to suggest what I consider an approach to this discussion, likely to yield us the right results. I think it's useful to differentiate between first-order effects and second-order. So, first-order effects are the direct effects of dmt. The second-order effects are our reactions to first-order effects. Second-order effects are partly influenced by our doctrines, past personal experiences, our psycho-neurological make-up, etc.
Of course, a psychoactive drug can trigger and influence multiple orders of reactions in the brain, even with enough strength so that it exceeds the typical extent of self-regulation. Nevertheless, it is important to make the distinction between first and second order effects, because I think there's definitely some feedback between our mindset and our reaction to the effects of the drug. For example, someone who is predisposed in life to religious/mystical experiences, might state that an "overwhelming sense of paradisiatic awe or magic" is one of the stronger effects of dmt. However, this tells us more about the mindset of the person, than about dmt. To me personally, my reaction to first-order effects was amusement, I found the effects overall comical. Since everyone is different, the reaction to first-order effects will vary from person to person, and therefore second-order effects are definitely an interesting area to explore, but unfortunately not the objective of this forum thread. Here I'm hoping to exchange notes about the first-order effects of the drug.
One final preliminary is the caveat that, of course, a lot about the first-order effects cannot easily be described. After all, dmt is a serotonergic psychedelic: it works by being similar enough to serotonin for neurones to mistake it as that; but because of the differences, it is difficult to recall the effects after they end, and to find the right words for a description. On the other hand, I believe we can still define different levels of effects, using minimal descriptions. For example, there is clearly a very low effect, when there is slight euphoria. Then a stronger level, when the visual effects appear, but only as 2D. Then another level, when the plane opens up in 3D, etc. My question is if there is a stronger level of effects than the one I will describe below.
When the effects were in full swing, my body was anaesthetised. I had a sleep mask and ear plugs on, so the stimuli during the effects originated only in my imagination, I wasn't responding at all to my external environment. I think this minimalistic setting was more practical for my objective to determine the different effect levels.
My body (i.e, I) pictured involuntarily a moving 3D plane overlaid with detailed, intricate, changing patterns. I also pictured a lot of activity and movement in the 3D plane, the activity involving the geometrical patterns that overlaid the plane. And I pictured the impression of interactions, and the part of the mind that responds to verbal communication was definitely engaged (this is, I think, what other people refer to as "meeting entities" ). There was a distinct feeling that it was "right" for the brain to react to those stimuli. My musical thinking was also active, I was working out melodic motifs and rhythms in my imagination.
Do you think first-order effects stronger than this are possible? Could you describe them?
Thanks
P.S.: After typing this, I read a number of essays on this forum about "hyper slap" black-outs, and the effects described seemed stronger.