Woolmer said:I read about halfway through that book before realizing that as is with most "Western Philosophy", the bros Karamazov tries to answer redundant questions relating to made-up ideas instead of focusing on meta-physics.
The Grand Inquisitor chapter really fascinated me so I told one of my friends about it and they asked but why bother with bringing Christianity along in the thought. The line of thought makes a lot of sense to me about the conflicts of good and bad, right and wrong, freedom... But then it is so odd to go in a completely different direction and discuss its relation to Christianity. It seems more senseful to venture further towards the meta-physics and then expand on how to live your life.
I don't know if that makes sense, but those are my thoughts.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts
I'm not a religious person myself, but I think the key to what you mentioned is understanding context. This was written in the 1800s, the church was a bigger institution and Dostoyevski himself was an orthodox Christian, so it's only natural that Christianity was a big part of the thought. This doesn't diminish the impact of the insights this book can bring imo, you can just "translate it" to your secular understanding of philosophy/spirituality.