Nathanial.Dread said:
Define 'chaos.' If you're using it colloquially, then sure. A lot of trips are unpredictable and hard to understand. I wouldn't call that a 'theme' though, but rather, just a quality of the experience.
If you're using the technical definition (a quality of deterministic systems where, as Edward Lorenz put it, "the present determines the future, but the approximate present does not approximately determine the future,") then you're asking a deep question that I cannot answer but would *love* to discuss.
My hunch is yes. I imagine that the DMT state is probably associated with a unique strange attractor in neural phase space that is distinct from other states of consciousness.
Blessings
~ND
Yeah, i mean Lorenzian chaos. "Sensitive dependence on initial conditions" sounds like set and setting to me, although there could be other factors at play. But on second thought, these factors might just a part of set and setting. I would say someone's neurochemistry is a part of the mind set.
The difficulty here is that trips cannot be measured. The data from EEG and fMRI studies are just as chaotic as the Lorenzian water wheel.
The chaotic nature of DMT is likely to be more complicated than cloud formation, turbulence or the tidal patterns of the ocean. All of these other chaotic systems have non linear equations that can be conceptualised. Gravity, friction and a huge plethora of other factors that come into play.
Lorenz created a simple weather model using only 12 equations. He mimicked both aperiodicity and sensitive dependence on initial conditions using these 12 equations.
Could this also be applied to DMT, with say, an EEG scan? The only EEG scan I saw of DMT reached the Nyquist frequency really rapidly, which correlates with the "blast off".
Is it even possible to create a deterministic model of the DMT experience?
Sorry if i sound like i'm rambling. The more i think about it, the more my head hurts.
Aaaaaand now i don't understand anything anymore. Thanks James Gleick!