Jagube
Established member
I soaked 85g of ACRB in cold vinegar 3 times (ok, it was 100g initially, but ~15g was bioassayed as a tea, over the course of 3 sessions). It came out very clear. I filtered it and reduced it to 90ml. I let it settle in the fridge and decanted, leaving behind an oily, water-insoluble sediment. This cleared it up even more. It was, however, still astringent.
I transferred it to a 200ml jar, added some salt and based it with lye to pH 12.3. It clouded with tiny crystals, which was reminiscent of the harmala basing of the acidic soup in rue extractions.
My first thought was "Is this DMT?"
I added ~90ml of naphtha and after some mixing, much of the crystals floated to the top (DMT being attracted to naphtha?) forming a layer between the water and naphtha, some sank to the bottom, and a lot of them stayed in suspension, which I didn't wait to let settle.
After each pull, there was less and less of the visible crystals in the aqueous layer.
I backsalted the pulls with vinegar and the first pull was so rich in DMT, it precipitated on the walls of the glass within a couple of minutes. Not as pretty crystals though, but rather small white blobs.
Summary:
1. Cold soaks are much cleaner than boils, making for cleaner extractions.
2. The extractions are so clean that the volume can be reduced significantly (100 ml per 100 g of bark, or even more concentrated) without affecting the extraction. No risk of emulsions (with naphtha anyway), and it's much easier to handle the smaller jars.
3. Now, this needs to be tested further, but an NP solvent may not even be necessary; instead, a rue-style extraction may be performed, whereby the acidic cold soaks are based, then allowed to settle, decanted and filtered - and this may work especially well with smaller water volumes. If this is not clean enough for a desired end product, this may be processed further (mini A/B, re-X etc.). For oral, however, after dissolving in vinegar or similar acid this precipitate may be clean enough.
My intention wasn't to obtain smokable fb, but rather an oral product, so I think I'll just evaporate the backsaltings, reconstitute with water and drink that.
In my next extraction I might see what a rue-style extraction, without an NP solvent produces.
I transferred it to a 200ml jar, added some salt and based it with lye to pH 12.3. It clouded with tiny crystals, which was reminiscent of the harmala basing of the acidic soup in rue extractions.
My first thought was "Is this DMT?"
I added ~90ml of naphtha and after some mixing, much of the crystals floated to the top (DMT being attracted to naphtha?) forming a layer between the water and naphtha, some sank to the bottom, and a lot of them stayed in suspension, which I didn't wait to let settle.
After each pull, there was less and less of the visible crystals in the aqueous layer.
I backsalted the pulls with vinegar and the first pull was so rich in DMT, it precipitated on the walls of the glass within a couple of minutes. Not as pretty crystals though, but rather small white blobs.
Summary:
1. Cold soaks are much cleaner than boils, making for cleaner extractions.
2. The extractions are so clean that the volume can be reduced significantly (100 ml per 100 g of bark, or even more concentrated) without affecting the extraction. No risk of emulsions (with naphtha anyway), and it's much easier to handle the smaller jars.
3. Now, this needs to be tested further, but an NP solvent may not even be necessary; instead, a rue-style extraction may be performed, whereby the acidic cold soaks are based, then allowed to settle, decanted and filtered - and this may work especially well with smaller water volumes. If this is not clean enough for a desired end product, this may be processed further (mini A/B, re-X etc.). For oral, however, after dissolving in vinegar or similar acid this precipitate may be clean enough.
My intention wasn't to obtain smokable fb, but rather an oral product, so I think I'll just evaporate the backsaltings, reconstitute with water and drink that.
In my next extraction I might see what a rue-style extraction, without an NP solvent produces.