So I've started my first extractions with measurable results and my theory on BRIX correlation with mescaline content seems viable however also swayed since I don't have enough data. I'll need to repeat extractions in the future with the same cacti at different BRIX levels to have more useful information. BRIX is used to measure maturity in some plants.
I've measured my cacti seedlings at 1 year of age and recorded the brix levels of each. I suspected that the higher the brix levels (without directly trying to increase it) would have higher content. I separated The 3 highest recorded bridgesii each over 4 'which is still low' with the highest at 4.8 and a single pachanoi recorded 3.5 which looks like a peruvianus/cuzco now.
There are many different factors the influence BRIX like watering, fertilizing and temperature. But if you could record the brix level before your extraction so I could collect more info quickly.
So I got around to extracting the bridgesii with the highest brix and it tested even higher at 5.2 Brix this time. The mescaline citrate came to 600mg around 4% estimating dry weight at 15g with higher possible since I didn't do multiple pulls due to some issues. The seedling is around 2.5 years old used 18inches which weighted 440 grams wet. It was still fairly thin and had ZERO bitterness to the tongue. This was my fastest and largest grower in my collection and I attribute it to the high BRIX despite it being in the same growing conditions of all my other cacti.
Now the pachanoi that tested 3.5 brix in the past now tested .5 brix. I also tested a semi-hydroponically grown pachanoi that in the past tested at 3 and now tested at 1 brix. The 3.5 very spiny pachanoi was also low bitterness and measured at 12 inches. The weight was at 480g and was much thicker with much more white flesh and core material. The semi-hydroponic pachanoi was bitter but not extreme and was also cut at 12 inches. The weight was 530g fresh and about the same thickness as the other pachanoi. The 3.5 brix pachanoi (.5 brix now) tested at around 280mg around 2% estimating dry weight at 13.5 and the other semi-hydroponic pachanoi tested around 240mg around 1.8% estimating dry at 13.5g
Looking at these brix levels there is little correlation since lowest brix .5 pachanoi tested higher content than the other at 1 brix however in the past it did test differently. Next year I'll be re-extracting these same clones at different brix levels to see if the content is different. Age may play an influence but hopefully I'll also be able have a few clones of the bridgesii and test different levels as well.
If people with the same clones SS02 or which ever all tested brix levels before extractions and sharing the results of content it would be helpful. If you have any thoughts even if just to say I'm wrong and saying brix has zero correlation with content.
I intend on following this project on my own but with a collective database it would help to more quickly know if this is worth pursuing or not. Regardless I am going to use brix measurement as a means of selecting seedlings since all the high BRIX seedlings grew much better than the other seedlings in the exact same conditions. I haven't attempted to increase brix levels other than testing after a drought period which actually lead to lower BRIX which was the opposite of what I expected.
I've measured my cacti seedlings at 1 year of age and recorded the brix levels of each. I suspected that the higher the brix levels (without directly trying to increase it) would have higher content. I separated The 3 highest recorded bridgesii each over 4 'which is still low' with the highest at 4.8 and a single pachanoi recorded 3.5 which looks like a peruvianus/cuzco now.
There are many different factors the influence BRIX like watering, fertilizing and temperature. But if you could record the brix level before your extraction so I could collect more info quickly.
So I got around to extracting the bridgesii with the highest brix and it tested even higher at 5.2 Brix this time. The mescaline citrate came to 600mg around 4% estimating dry weight at 15g with higher possible since I didn't do multiple pulls due to some issues. The seedling is around 2.5 years old used 18inches which weighted 440 grams wet. It was still fairly thin and had ZERO bitterness to the tongue. This was my fastest and largest grower in my collection and I attribute it to the high BRIX despite it being in the same growing conditions of all my other cacti.
Now the pachanoi that tested 3.5 brix in the past now tested .5 brix. I also tested a semi-hydroponically grown pachanoi that in the past tested at 3 and now tested at 1 brix. The 3.5 very spiny pachanoi was also low bitterness and measured at 12 inches. The weight was at 480g and was much thicker with much more white flesh and core material. The semi-hydroponic pachanoi was bitter but not extreme and was also cut at 12 inches. The weight was 530g fresh and about the same thickness as the other pachanoi. The 3.5 brix pachanoi (.5 brix now) tested at around 280mg around 2% estimating dry weight at 13.5 and the other semi-hydroponic pachanoi tested around 240mg around 1.8% estimating dry at 13.5g
Looking at these brix levels there is little correlation since lowest brix .5 pachanoi tested higher content than the other at 1 brix however in the past it did test differently. Next year I'll be re-extracting these same clones at different brix levels to see if the content is different. Age may play an influence but hopefully I'll also be able have a few clones of the bridgesii and test different levels as well.
If people with the same clones SS02 or which ever all tested brix levels before extractions and sharing the results of content it would be helpful. If you have any thoughts even if just to say I'm wrong and saying brix has zero correlation with content.
I intend on following this project on my own but with a collective database it would help to more quickly know if this is worth pursuing or not. Regardless I am going to use brix measurement as a means of selecting seedlings since all the high BRIX seedlings grew much better than the other seedlings in the exact same conditions. I haven't attempted to increase brix levels other than testing after a drought period which actually lead to lower BRIX which was the opposite of what I expected.