SnozzleBerry said:As should go without saying, the following is entirely my opinion and should be understood as such![]()
If that's what you're looking for...good for you, I guess? My drug use is mine and I don't need it to be accepted as/masked as "legitimate religious sacrament".entheogenic-gnosis said:Though I feel the more legitimate organizations claiming sacramental entheogen use that are out there, the better chances entheogens have at being accepted as genuine and legitimate religious sacraments.
My drug use is legitimate because I'm an autonomous human being, capable of making my own informed decisions.
My legitimacy and power are derived from my very being, not from some constructed institution designed to dress it up into something that makes other people more comfortable with it. The very premise of this endeavor is a prohibitionist mindset--that our drug use is illegitimate so lets dress it up to make it more respectable. :thumb_dow
Just because an organization plays by the laws of the state does not make it "legitimate" in any context other than the laws of the state. This notion of utilizing "legitimate organizations" to create a haven for users of "legitimate religious sacraments" is little more than deciding to play a game in which you are perpetually looking to make yourself acceptable to others. Count me out.
:lol:I honestly think the church of entheogenic gnosis is the most open spiritual organization in existence next to shamanism itself, though a 200mg dose DMT initiation is required of all members at joining, as is daily marijuana use, dedication to non-violence except in self-defense, regular entheogenic exploration, meditation, participation in group entheogenic events, and a meat free diet.
Unfortunately, I assume this is not satire?
Is most open spiritual like being the most enlightened or most humble?
Was a 200mg initiation dose of DMT decided on because you all felt it was the dose most likely to leave people feeling vulnerable/traumatized enough to need a church?
Are the rest of the somewhat absurd tenets you propose an attempt to mimic the Neo-American Church?
hixidom said:I do. I think most of us wouldn't be here had someone not taken us under their psychedelic wing in the past.We don't try to convert others
hixidom said:I do. I think most of us wouldn't be here had someone not taken us under their psychedelic wing in the past.We don't try to convert others
dreamer042 said::thumb_dowentheogenic-gnosis said:I honestly think the church of entheogenic gnosis is the most open spiritual organization in existence next to shamanism itself, though a 200mg dose DMT initiation is required of all members at joining, as is daily marijuana use, dedication to non-violence except in self-defense, regular entheogenic exploration, meditation, participation in group entheogenic events, and a meat free diet.
This is bunkum
200mg via any ROA is ridiculously high for people such as myself who are extremely sensitive to the effects of tryptamines. While physically safe, even an experienced explorer such as myself would be taking their chances with winding up in the ER with such a silly practice. To make this a tenet of a religion is well...
Dum da Dum Dum... :?
Requiring excessive dosing, requiring cannabis use, dictating diet. I thought this was supposed to be an alternative to dogmatic traditions... You will need to seriously overhaul the tenets of your faith if you want my support.
SnozzleBerry said:As should go without saying, the following is entirely my opinion and should be understood as such![]()
If that's what you're looking for...good for you, I guess? My drug use is mine and I don't need it to be accepted as/masked as "legitimate religious sacrament".entheogenic-gnosis said:Though I feel the more legitimate organizations claiming sacramental entheogen use that are out there, the better chances entheogens have at being accepted as genuine and legitimate religious sacraments.
My drug use is legitimate because I'm an autonomous human being, capable of making my own informed decisions.
My legitimacy and power are derived from my very being, not from some constructed institution designed to dress it up into something that makes other people more comfortable with it. The very premise of this endeavor is a prohibitionist mindset--that our drug use is illegitimate so lets dress it up to make it more respectable. :thumb_dow
Just because an organization plays by the laws of the state does not make it "legitimate" in any context other than the laws of the state. This notion of utilizing "legitimate organizations" to create a haven for users of "legitimate religious sacraments" is little more than deciding to play a game in which you are perpetually looking to make yourself acceptable to others. Count me out.
:lol:I honestly think the church of entheogenic gnosis is the most open spiritual organization in existence next to shamanism itself, though a 200mg dose DMT initiation is required of all members at joining, as is daily marijuana use, dedication to non-violence except in self-defense, regular entheogenic exploration, meditation, participation in group entheogenic events, and a meat free diet.
Unfortunately, I assume this is not satire?
Is most open spiritual like being the most enlightened or most humble?
Was a 200mg initiation dose of DMT decided on because you all felt it was the dose most likely to leave people feeling vulnerable/traumatized enough to need a church?
Are the rest of the somewhat absurd tenets you propose an attempt to mimic the Neo-American Church?
Sphorange said:hixidom said:I do. I think most of us wouldn't be here had someone not taken us under their psychedelic wing in the past.We don't try to convert others
Id like to highlight this, I feel it was a little glossed over.
The sharing of whatever-this-movement-blah-blah call it what you will; the actual information itself will be watered down, vague-ified and the implications lessened in a group environment.
The student/teacher relationship while slow, is a fantastic model for spreading the psychedelic virus.
I know that implies a sense of servitude/heiarchy but when approached in a mature and respectful manner great things can be done - Aristotle/Socrates/Plato etc.
travsha said:Another cult in the making....
travsha said:Does not strike me as shamanic, but if you say so.
What happens if someone disobeys your rules?entheogenic-gnosis said:I'm going to define dogma quickly:
a principle or set of principles laid down by an authority as incontrovertibly true -Wikipedia
We are a dogma free tradition by this definition.
Naive.The only difference between what we are doing and shamanism is shamanism is centered on healing.
IMO a vegetarian diet is far from crazy...seagull said:And to limit there spending by crazy diets and stuff?!
SnozzleBerry said:What happens if someone disobeys your rules?entheogenic-gnosis said:I'm going to define dogma quickly:
a principle or set of principles laid down by an authority as incontrovertibly true -Wikipedia
We are a dogma free tradition by this definition.
What if they forget to smoke their daily weed, or accidentally eat meat? What if they only dose 50mg DMT?
Also, 200mg is an absurd dose. If you are seriously dosing or "initiating" people to DMT at that dose, you really need to reconsider your actions. You could end up doing considerable harm (to say nothing of the fact that 200mgs is just wasteful).
:!:
Check yourself before you wreck yourself (or more probably someone else, which is the real problem)
entheogenic-gnosis said:Sphorange said:hixidom said:I do. I think most of us wouldn't be here had someone not taken us under their psychedelic wing in the past.We don't try to convert others
Id like to highlight this, I feel it was a little glossed over.
The sharing of whatever-this-movement-blah-blah call it what you will; the actual information itself will be watered down, vague-ified and the implications lessened in a group environment.
The student/teacher relationship while slow, is a fantastic model for spreading the psychedelic virus.
I know that implies a sense of servitude/heiarchy but when approached in a mature and respectful manner great things can be done - Aristotle/Socrates/Plato etc.
I agree with you here, and believe me, there are no "teachers" or "students", we are all equal, there is no hierarchical power structure, there's no "head" or "leader", we are a community of equals.
the initiation is done alone, I mean there will be what ever people you want to have with you there, but you are the only one who smokes. The others are there for support and supervision, not as teachers or as people in an authoritative position. Though ayahuasca is frequently used in groups as is mescaline.
The majority of the work is done alone, 75% of the time that I take psychedelics I do it alone, though I still enjoy having the church to discuss my solo experiences with as a means of aide in processing, and it's support from people who really know entheogens and more importantly really know me.
I can't understand people's backlash here's (at least not if they actually read the things I have written here about it), all of the cultural norms are positive things intended to improve your life as well as the lives of the people around you, the rest of it involves entering non-physical, after-death, and spiritual states through entheogens as a means of preparation for and understanding of the conscious existence that waits after death.
-eg
InLaKesh said:IMO a vegetarian diet is far from crazy...seagull said:And to limit there spending by crazy diets and stuff?!
Sphorange said:entheogenic-gnosis said:Sphorange said:hixidom said:I do. I think most of us wouldn't be here had someone not taken us under their psychedelic wing in the past.We don't try to convert others
Id like to highlight this, I feel it was a little glossed over.
The sharing of whatever-this-movement-blah-blah call it what you will; the actual information itself will be watered down, vague-ified and the implications lessened in a group environment.
The student/teacher relationship while slow, is a fantastic model for spreading the psychedelic virus.
I know that implies a sense of servitude/heiarchy but when approached in a mature and respectful manner great things can be done - Aristotle/Socrates/Plato etc.
I agree with you here, and believe me, there are no "teachers" or "students", we are all equal, there is no hierarchical power structure, there's no "head" or "leader", we are a community of equals.
the initiation is done alone, I mean there will be what ever people you want to have with you there, but you are the only one who smokes. The others are there for support and supervision, not as teachers or as people in an authoritative position. Though ayahuasca is frequently used in groups as is mescaline.
The majority of the work is done alone, 75% of the time that I take psychedelics I do it alone, though I still enjoy having the church to discuss my solo experiences with as a means of aide in processing, and it's support from people who really know entheogens and more importantly really know me.
I can't understand people's backlash here's (at least not if they actually read the things I have written here about it), all of the cultural norms are positive things intended to improve your life as well as the lives of the people around you, the rest of it involves entering non-physical, after-death, and spiritual states through entheogens as a means of preparation for and understanding of the conscious existence that waits after death.
-eg
I respect someone swimming against the tide![]()
I have a feeling that you are a couple of decades ahead of the times - As community strengthens and central authority wanes in certain parts of the world and of course; psychedelics become as ubiquitous as scratching ones bottom :twisted:
Our species will require centres for integration - the likes of which you are proposing, full of wizards and professors and screwball chefs, artists, musicians, and of course stripper-witches (long story)
Good luck I say!
Keep the doctors close and the profits minimal-to-non-existent and you should break away from the old cult/church status :lol: