• Members of the previous forum can retrieve their temporary password here, (login and check your PM).

Dilemma regarding academic vandalism

Migrated topic.

RhythmSpring

Esteemed member
Dear Nexus Abby,

I was doing some work for a family friend--editing word documents. She had me edit/format a syllabus for a course she'll be teaching this Summer, on helping people process grief over the loss of loved ones.

In one of the sections, there was a bullet point list of topics to go over:

• Psychological theories of grief and bereavement
• Psychodynamic theories of grief and bereavement
• Constructivist theories of grief and bereavement
• The transformative nature of grief
• Continuing bonds
• Psychedelic therapy for grief and bereavement
• Differences between normal and complicated grief
• Controversies about the diagnosis of complicated grief.

Being the badass tool that I am, I myself inserted "Psychedelic therapy for grief and bereavement" on a whim, telling myself that I'd delete it later, and, that if I forgot to delete it, it was meant to be.

Of course, I submitted it, forgetting remove my creative addition.

The professor/psychotherapist is a really sweet woman in her 60s and is not a stranger to psychedelic culture, though she strikes me as a person not to have dabbled much.

What should I do? Should I own up, take the embarrassment, and have her remove it?

Or should I let it be (she hasn't noticed yet), and let one of her students notice it and bring it to her attention? I think it could spark some interesting discussion or thought trains or research sprees both in the students and the professor that would not have otherwise occurred.

It's a decision between business as usual and hoping for a little academic vandalism to spark some productive thought.

Looking back, I realize that I did this because I thought it easier and more effective than bringing it up in conversation. Though she is sweet, I don't think her mind is open enough at this point to consider mentioning it in the classroom or even doing some research on it on her own.

Sincerely,

Guilty in Alabama

(not in Alabama)
 
I'd suggest you contact her immediately and fess up. Begin the conversation with her directly rather than having it go unnoticed and potentially effect her career.

My 2 sense
 
dreamer042 said:
I'd suggest you contact her immediately and fess up. Begin the conversation with her directly rather than having it go unnoticed and potentially effect her career.

My 2 sense

^ this. There is a reason many professors don't bring up psychedelics too heavily - it could have a massive effect on their career. It's unfortunate that this is the case, and that more don't come out of the psychedelic closet, but it is what it is... and inserting that without telling her is not the way to go about broaching the subject.
 
id confess , but id be unrepentant about it.
im sure shes a nice lady and all,
but if shes not fully informed abuot psyches as a grief counselor,
shes just failing us all.

i get really bored with grief counselors who think we can all hug and whine our way out of it.
some of us require hallucinogens and heroic measures.
 
RhythmSpring said:
...Or should I let it be (she hasn't noticed yet),...
I think she should notice as the very first person to notice. Why wouldn't she check on editing work done on her behalf by someone else?

What if this wasn't about your add, but about any other possible mistake you could have made?
 
i wouldnt get too bogged down with this really.

she should do her own homework, or hire a ghost writer,
and be more aware of her trade in general.

social helpers are like musicians.
plentiful, and lots of BS,
but rarely any talent above the local bar level.

when one is sucked in helping helpers, ya have to wonder what the help is worth.

the real ethical question here is "why assist those who cant assist themselves professionally"

its gotten to be a craze of quacks, hacks and wannabees,
pushing the load off on unsuspecting people in the name of " helping"
its a social trap, that evades accountability.
dont enable.
 
Well yeah, but then let people do the things they want without labeling it?
Like favoring certain style of music, or not.

I know IMHO they have the pretension to "deal" with the issues while they might instead just keep swimming in it. Let them. I did that too time ago and I'm glad I did, it is all lessons. If not for the "matter" they might just get to know fine people, messy people, get outside, socialize, learn about life. One way or the other. Sitting on a bench in the park is another. Or having a visit at Anne's place for another kind a-stroke-of-life.
;)
 
Back
Top Bottom