It's not a contradiction to say:AlbertKLloyd said:This is your main contradiction, for you cannot reasonably affirm my experiences and conclusions are at odds with "normal" and then state that normal is extremely variable.- You claim that they believe in a uniform nature of effects, despite the evidence that many, if not most, would claim that DMT is one of the most variable experiences you can have.
See above comment regarding this contradiction in your position.- You conflate questioning an experience (or an explanation/understanding of an experience) that seems at odds with what many people report to experience (or feel/understand they have experienced) as labeling that experience as "invalid."
The DMT experience can be wildly variable from one experience to another. However, many people report encountering similar memes, archetypes, spaces, entities, etc. The DMT experience is incredibly unpredictable from one experience to the next, however, there tend to be components that are commonly encountered by many people, including the "rush" of the onset, feelings of "deja vu," out of body experiences, feelings of oneness with the universe, etc. etc. (modify the list as you see fit, according to those similarities that stand out amongst myriads of trip reports).
Therefore, we can then say that, despite the marked variability of DMT experiences, there are experiences that seem "out of the ordinary" (although ordinary is being used to describe a seemingly infinite range of effects, here) even for DMT. Take, for example, gibran2's "realer than real" experience where he was told he was never really alive to begin with. Take for example any of the reports where very experienced users have reported "breaking through the breakthrough" or encountering individual experiences that stood out amidst the backdrop of the hundreds of other DMT sessions they had experienced. The only reason anything stands out, whether a DMT experience, or an object in the foreground of a picture, is because it contrasts with other things...that is to say, it has some sort of different quality.
As such, it is not contradictory to state that, although the DMT experience is wildly variable (as many people on this site keep insisting to you) there are experiences that are so far out of the realm of what people have encountered on their myriads of DMT experiences, that these experiences can be (and have been) labelled as outliers; sometimes by the very people who have had these seemingly "out of the wide range that one might describe as 'ordinary' in that their variability seems more relatable to each other" trips.
As a final example. If someone stated that they had a breakthrough experience, but claimed that they were still able to communicate with others in the room, were still able to observe "waking reality" around them, were still able to function in normal, routine manners during the breakthrough...this would qualify as being so far outside of what is commonly understood to occur during a breakthrough DMT experience that the nature of this experience would be questioned, as it would represent a severe outlier to what is generally experienced during a DMT breakthrough. (I've actually had an experience remarkably similar to this that I've described as breaking through into "ordinary reality" and it's still one of the weirdest DMT experiences I've had).
To question this/label it as an outlier DOES NOT contradict the statement that the DMT experience is wildly variable.
This will most likely be my last post on this topic. It bothers me that my critiques are met with "I'm not doing this, you're doing this," rather than a sound rebuttal, when I feel that I have laid out the justification as to why I'm stating that I feel you to be engaged in certain behaviors. This rubber/glue modality, on top of a topic that I find to be a red herring (your constructed DMT religion as a tool for dismissal of other's viewpoints), has completely burned me out for this discussion.
No hard feelings...it is what it is.