AwesomeUsername
Esteemed member
For me it's about the same. Having experienced ayahuasca I had very challenging experiences, but I don't regret it a bit.
Many people seem to go through a phase with acid and eventually switch to psilos or aya for good. Not for me... It seems like it can go as deep if the dose is right for minimal amount of body load to distract me from the psychedelia.
The visuals are way different than the DMT-based entheogens, but I like them nevertheless.
My personal view on LSD after DMT didn't change a bit, I might even like it more since it kind of opened me up to this kind of DMT headspace with all the goodies and euphoria I get from acid.
Many DMT-heads claim that acid lacks some depths and is superficial. I think this is dose dependent, and after having drank ayahuasca many times I still think it can go just as deep even though most people don't usually eat more than one/two average tabs.
Even when I was only an acid head, I never quite understood how any psychedelic could be deeper than the other. It could only be different. Am I missing something?
Many people seem to go through a phase with acid and eventually switch to psilos or aya for good. Not for me... It seems like it can go as deep if the dose is right for minimal amount of body load to distract me from the psychedelia.
The visuals are way different than the DMT-based entheogens, but I like them nevertheless.
My personal view on LSD after DMT didn't change a bit, I might even like it more since it kind of opened me up to this kind of DMT headspace with all the goodies and euphoria I get from acid.
Many DMT-heads claim that acid lacks some depths and is superficial. I think this is dose dependent, and after having drank ayahuasca many times I still think it can go just as deep even though most people don't usually eat more than one/two average tabs.
Even when I was only an acid head, I never quite understood how any psychedelic could be deeper than the other. It could only be different. Am I missing something?