He claims to have never worked with the neurotransmission! Ever! In any way shape or form.
fractal enchantment said:warrensaged said:MagikVenom said:The guy in Sprint Molocule who had the experance with the rape by lizard men was a lightweight whos only experience with psychedelics was with E, Strassman said his application was over looked and he never should have included him in the study.
Keep in mind these guys were doing the experiments in a average hospital room, just down the hall from the main nursing station too...loud, intrusive, unsettling-setting to say the least.
Not only that...if I remember correctly, they had anal thermometers in most, if not all the participants too!!
Talk about a (cold) bad-rape-trip...Geez!!
Those two issue in mind, plus the fact that you would have a strange doctor & two nurses staring at you the whole time & the noise of the heart monitor, etc...it's a surprise anyone had a positive experience as far as I'm concerned!!!
If I remember correctly, I think Dr. Strassmans mentioned these variable in his book too.
So you can't blame this guy too much!
WS
...so..did strassman ever dose himself?..prob not or a better locale would be chosen..
Under those conditions listed above I would say that those experiments are worthless..Part of the benifit of spice and aya is relaxation..and a meditive mindset of sorts I guess you could say.. when a study like this is done, it really cant say much about the reality of aya, DMT, mushrooms or any entheogen in the way most use it here..I would not be able to relax and meditate with a thermometre in my ass, or strange nurses walking around checking my vital signs every 30 seconds..let alone relax into any sort of trip! Those participants are damn brave! I dont blame the guy for freaking out...
I also kinda think that it's a bit biased to only use experienced psychonaughts..I think it would be more interesting to see how everyday people react, both experienced and non experienced...becasue the ones who have used psychs already may have heard of DMT and terrence mckenna and such..so it would be interesting to see how they're experiences matched up with the ones of the complete newbs..
I think that strassman should just dose himself if he hasnt already before he goes any farther..so at least he know what he is giving others.
۩ said:He claims to have never worked with the neurotransmission! Ever! In any way shape or form.
fractal enchantment said:۩ said:He claims to have never worked with the neurotransmission! Ever! In any way shape or form.
Maybe he is just saying that to save his job..I hope so anyway..otherwise where is the real scientist in there?
endlessness said:well think about it this way: usually in joe rogan's rants he expresses many opinions as if they were fact, which lead to misunderstanding from people who just follow what he says.. But, its exactly these people who will hear that joe rogan is playing a part of narration in some documentary, and they will watch it.. But this documentary is not made by joe rogan, which means it will be much more accurate.. so the people who are usually misled by rogan will probably learn much more in depth about it.. So its maybe even a good thing that he does this narration
But this documentary is not made by joe rogan, which means it will be much more accurate.. so the people who are usually misled by rogan will probably learn much more in depth about it.. So its maybe even a good thing that he does this narration
Infundibulum said:Rick Strassman's an academic and a public person. It is not easy to admit trying dmt because it's a controlled substance (questions of where he found it would arise from any interested parties) and he never really got permission to try dmt himself, only administer it to other people.
In some way, especially when it comes to psychedelics and how they are viewed by the mainstream scientific community, trying a strong, potentially life and thought-changing psychedelic as dmt might have skewed his interpretation. It is far easier (just for the record) to not admit doing dmt because then you convince people that you maintain an fairly objective point of view with regard to the analysis of other people's experiences.
Admitting that he had also tried dmt would result in other people arguing that he's trying to pigeon-hole the subject's experiences to what he had experienced. You cannot easily and in most cases be both the experiment and the experimenter.
Infundibulum said:Rick Strassman's an academic and a public person. It is not easy to admit trying dmt because it's a controlled substance (questions of where he found it would arise from any interested parties) and he never really got permission to try dmt himself, only administer it to other people.
In some way, especially when it comes to psychedelics and how they are viewed by the mainstream scientific community, trying a strong, potentially life and thought-changing psychedelic as dmt might have skewed his interpretation. It is far easier (just for the record) to not admit doing dmt because then you convince people that you maintain an fairly objective point of view with regard to the analysis of other people's experiences.
Admitting that he had also tried dmt would result in other people arguing that he's trying to pigeon-hole the subject's experiences to what he had experienced. You cannot easily and in most cases be both the experiment and the experimenter.
No matter how much I may have played around with the term "psychedelic" I never came up with its "spychedelic" version!Dwhitty76 said:..from using spychedelics for scientific research...
we just need to find a way to pool the $ into one account and make a donation, and know that we had something to do with the making of this educational film.
Infundibulum said:No matter how much I may have played around with the term "psychedelic" I never came up with its "spychedelic" version!Dwhitty76 said:..from using spychedelics for scientific research...