Oh yes .. I laugh at my self all the time .. it's good for everyone to laugh ! I think there's something cathartic in my ranting though, ... forgive me if it grates on anyone ~! .. maybe I speak for a few other skeptics too ..
Rainbow Serpent's tek ignores the fact that the pKa of dmt is 8.7 .. basifying a pH of 13.5 is just ridiculous and I say it's an error, 1000 times too much lye !. Lye-eaters are everywhere !
The moral of the story - when basifying, have an NP solvent layer already on the acid-extract before adding lye, and be quick - 30 minutes max, and then replace the NP solvent and do it two more times. All the dmt-freebase will have come out by then if using naphtha. Give the dmt-freebase a place to go, before it clumps into gunk. And why avoid filtering the stuff - how else do you assure purity..? Always filter the acid extract. In the pulp mill tek there is un-filtered sludge where clathrates are unavoidable.
For the sake of all of our understanding -I am glad to have the concept of a 'clathrate' to explain how an STB tek works ... That does work for me - it'll shut up my mistrust of the method, but I'll still have some comments about what's the 'better' way.
For eg - you
will not get as clean dmt-freebase from a pulp-mill tek - and you will
have to wash and lose some yield.
Filtering an acid extract, followed by quick basification, using naphtha as NP solvent makes uber-clean dmt-freebase at a yeild of 0.7 - 0.98 %. This is easy as pie, skip all freezer sep', just evaporate your NP solvent and get 0.9% yield, very pure dmt.
Derailing the thread a bit more here ... given that carpet stains can be totally eliminated with this stuff !
Do people choose the pulp-mill tek because it's supposed to be cheaper - what's going on there, what's being saved..? It used to be called the 'lazyman's tek' ... There are more steps involved (washing etc ..), it yields dirtier products at lower yields....