Bedazzle said:
I would have hated the film much less if they had left dmt out of it.
I think this pretty much sums up my impression on the people who hate this film. It's like someone made an interesting and original movie, but it happened to have a scene about fighter piloting which was very inaccurate and simplified. Then you go to the fighter pilot forums and wonder why they all seem to hate the movie so much...
And I perfectly understand it, I'm a sort of geek and whenever I see those scenes where they make something absolutely retarded with technologies, for example find out the reg plates of a car after "enhancing" a digital image (you cant f***ing interpolate all that from a few pixels!!), after that I always need to pause it and take a deep breath and remind myself that not everyone in the world cares about stuff like that.
With Enter the Void I didn't get that kind of a nerdrage reaction because I wasn't very experienced with DMT at the time, but now I can see how the scene is not very accurate at all. In addition to the answering the phone nonsense, it's completely lacking actual psychedelic aspects like a kind of insanity/fractal/checkerpattern/nurseryrhyme stuff. It's more like a Hollywood interpretation of a DMT trip, with just "cool" visuals.
But so what? If you have to, just skip the scene or something, but don't let it affect your opinions about the rest of the movie. And BTW this isn't really a "movie" in the traditional sense, it's more like a non-interactive first-person experience, and it should be watched with a good theater system and a willingness to get immersed. A shame he didn't make it in 3D, I think this kind of stuff is meant to be watched in full 3D with VR goggles or something. The plot is what it is, but it's more about the experience itself that the director is trying to bring out..
Ah well whatever , I should maybe try not to get so defensive everytime someone hates on this movie..