I would like to hone in on the notion of "escapism". It's the red flag that seems to go up every now and again around here, so I would like to take a little time to analyze the idea. When someone pulls the escapism alarm, there is this implication that the person is smoking DMT for the purpose of getting away from everyday life and its problems, and moreover that this is an inappropriate way to go about things. We have two components here: the assumption and the judgment.
It is first assumed that the DMT user is entering hyperspace in order to avoid "reality". This thought tends to be provoked by what the accuser views to be "overuse" which is again a subjective judgment and often as a product of psychological projection in which we discover more about the accuser than the accused. People with different personalities, biochemistry, and tendencies for experiencing hyperspace vary widely when it comes to those who smoke DMT. Some people may simply be more psychologically suited to "frequent" use than others. I think it can be likened to some extent to horror movies in the sense that there are people (like me) who would prefer to watch 0-1 horror movies in a week (leaning toward zero) whereas someone else may watch a horror movie marathon. In this analogy, we're watching the same movie(s) unlike in hyperspace where the "movie" is completely random, but nonetheless, one person feels like one was enough and is compelled to avoid such an experience for a certain duration of time where another person is eager to see another. In such an example, I could imagine myself saying to another, "why would you want to do that?!?!" to which I'd expect an answer such as "because I like them!" Since I know that horror movies make me feel bad, I end up projecting onto others that they must feel similarly and should react as I do, but this would be inappropriate. The overuse aspect to this argument is funny because it implies that assuming you are just entering hyperspace "for kicks" that there's some magical number of times you can enter with such intentions without it being considered escapism...:?: :?
I think a lot of thoughts and emotions from which feelings of overuse stem are a result of this idea that there must be a period of integration to be allowed for. I feel that this kind of thinking doesn't allow for the fact that not all DMT experiences are made equal. Out of x times that one may travel in a week, so many of those times could be "duds" or just "more of the same ole". Perhaps I simply contrast with the orthodoxy opinion that every experience needs integration. For the record, I'm not advocating overuse - I encourage "safe" and responsible use on everyone's behalf - but what I am saying is that there is no objective number you can place on how many times is too much. People and DMT are just too variable with idiosyncratically unique circumstances that whatever may happen to work for you isn't necessarily right for someone else.
There is another assumption in calling escapism that posits consensual reality as the "primary" one. If we were to believe (as some DMT users do) that hyperspace is real (and significant) then the whole escapism argument could be turned on its head by saying that people do meaningless things in life to avoid the reality of hyperspace. In fact, this is one of the primary motives of those who avoid trying/doing DMT. In the light of hyperspace (possibly) being a primary reality, it would be those people who actively avoid doing DMT who would be the escapists.
Furthermore, pulling the escapism card makes assumptions and judgments on a person's motives. For example, if the user is smoking DMT for spiritual purposes - to connect with the divine - then it should seem wildly out of place to call that person an escapist should he choose to venture more often than you would. If we were to have someone who wants to go to church everyday, it would just seem silly to call them escapists for doing so, yet if a psychonaut decides to go to hyperspace on a similar schedule, with similar intentions (getting closer to the divine), he may be called an escapist. It all just seems pretty silly.
It is first assumed that the DMT user is entering hyperspace in order to avoid "reality". This thought tends to be provoked by what the accuser views to be "overuse" which is again a subjective judgment and often as a product of psychological projection in which we discover more about the accuser than the accused. People with different personalities, biochemistry, and tendencies for experiencing hyperspace vary widely when it comes to those who smoke DMT. Some people may simply be more psychologically suited to "frequent" use than others. I think it can be likened to some extent to horror movies in the sense that there are people (like me) who would prefer to watch 0-1 horror movies in a week (leaning toward zero) whereas someone else may watch a horror movie marathon. In this analogy, we're watching the same movie(s) unlike in hyperspace where the "movie" is completely random, but nonetheless, one person feels like one was enough and is compelled to avoid such an experience for a certain duration of time where another person is eager to see another. In such an example, I could imagine myself saying to another, "why would you want to do that?!?!" to which I'd expect an answer such as "because I like them!" Since I know that horror movies make me feel bad, I end up projecting onto others that they must feel similarly and should react as I do, but this would be inappropriate. The overuse aspect to this argument is funny because it implies that assuming you are just entering hyperspace "for kicks" that there's some magical number of times you can enter with such intentions without it being considered escapism...:?: :?
I think a lot of thoughts and emotions from which feelings of overuse stem are a result of this idea that there must be a period of integration to be allowed for. I feel that this kind of thinking doesn't allow for the fact that not all DMT experiences are made equal. Out of x times that one may travel in a week, so many of those times could be "duds" or just "more of the same ole". Perhaps I simply contrast with the orthodoxy opinion that every experience needs integration. For the record, I'm not advocating overuse - I encourage "safe" and responsible use on everyone's behalf - but what I am saying is that there is no objective number you can place on how many times is too much. People and DMT are just too variable with idiosyncratically unique circumstances that whatever may happen to work for you isn't necessarily right for someone else.
There is another assumption in calling escapism that posits consensual reality as the "primary" one. If we were to believe (as some DMT users do) that hyperspace is real (and significant) then the whole escapism argument could be turned on its head by saying that people do meaningless things in life to avoid the reality of hyperspace. In fact, this is one of the primary motives of those who avoid trying/doing DMT. In the light of hyperspace (possibly) being a primary reality, it would be those people who actively avoid doing DMT who would be the escapists.
Furthermore, pulling the escapism card makes assumptions and judgments on a person's motives. For example, if the user is smoking DMT for spiritual purposes - to connect with the divine - then it should seem wildly out of place to call that person an escapist should he choose to venture more often than you would. If we were to have someone who wants to go to church everyday, it would just seem silly to call them escapists for doing so, yet if a psychonaut decides to go to hyperspace on a similar schedule, with similar intentions (getting closer to the divine), he may be called an escapist. It all just seems pretty silly.

