downwardsfromzero
Boundary condition
The lab notes look good. I think the reactivity of mescaline base (or perhaps a proxy amine like DMPEA) with EtOAc could do with being quantified. The reaction of primary and secondary amines with esters is well established.Loveall said:DWZ, if you want, you can read the TEK's "lab notes". I tired to summarize most of the thread results there for convenience. See if you find any issues with our logic and tentative conclusions. Also, feel free to update that section with your thoughts or observations.
And thank you for your practical efforts, all contributors!shroombee said:Thanks for your thoughts!
More or less, yes. At some point one or other of the reagents will get used up.For those of us who dropped out of organic chemistry... :lol: Does further base dissolving mean that more calcium acetate and ethanol is formed, causing more base to dissolve, ad infinitum?The difference between the 3 minute pulls and the 10 minute pulls is paramount. With the longer pulls there is over 3 times the contact time with the lime, which despite its poor solubility is still as we know a strong base. This will react with the ethyl acetate to form calcium acetate and ethanol - and further base will dissolve to maintain equilibrium.
As I see it, ethanol kind of bridges between the aqueous phase and the organic phase, being soluble in both. This allows the ethyl acetate to stick to the lime paste more readily. Calcium acetate will form a gel with ethanol, too. This all says "sticky" to my intuitive chemical imagination :?What does the wetting mean? And how does this affect the system?I think the calcium acetate is likely to be behind the stickiness that develops - perhaps along with the ethanol which will increase the 'wetting' of the paste by the solvent.
All I can say here is, it looked like 30% losses for one of you experimenters over 24hrs - and that was with refrigeration(?).Any idea how much time this reaction takes?In a similar vein, given enough time freebase mescaline will react with ethyl acetate to produce ethanol and N-acetylmescaline.
That's pretty much my reasoning, yes. Additionally, IIRC there's some data showing N-AcMesc to be essentially inactive. Would have to check that though. The thought of attempting to recover mesc from this makes me shudderIt's a loss of yield because the N-acetylmescaline doesn't further react to form mescaline citrate, and thus this N-acetylmescaline remains in solution, correct?It seems you've intuited this already by going straight from pulls to salting, but I think it's important enough to state for anyone who might be interested in testing this method themselves. N-acetylmescaline would represent a technical loss of yield. There's every chance it would remain in solution after the salting and it would be interesting to see if it's a component of the oily evaporation residue.
Ethyl acetate is a reactive solvent (compared to naphtha or tolu/xylene). It's very fortunate that those quick pulls work so well, as does the quick salting. Time really is of the essence here.