Alisoka
Rising Star
And if so, how would you say that the experience compares to mushrooms?
I have only experienced the fungi, personally. I have heard both sides of this argument with some saying that there is a big difference and others saying that there is none at all. I'm inclined to think that there must be some difference. Even if neither baeocystin and norbaeocystin or their dephosphorylated derivatives have direct psychedelic properties, I find it pretty hard to believe that they would have no pharmacological properties whatsoever, especially considering that they are technically even more similar in structure to serotonin than psilocybin and psilocin are, respectively.
The biggest differences that I have ever heard people describe between pure psilocin and mushrooms as well happens to be that the former is much more lucid and controllable, and possibly more visual as well. I cannot speak for this last part, but I can say that every synthetic 4-substituted tryptamine that I've tried, including some like 4-HO-MET which are pretty darn close in structure to psilocin, has been remarkably lucid and manageable, while mushrooms on the other hand have consistently given me the most powerful mind warping of any psychedelic I've used. This just gives me more reason to think that the two experiences might indeed be quite different.
Of course, this question will never be truly answered for myself until I have the chance to weigh the two types of trips myself, but it doesn't hurt to ask for outside opinions as well, right? So, have you ever gotten to try psilocin by itself?
I have only experienced the fungi, personally. I have heard both sides of this argument with some saying that there is a big difference and others saying that there is none at all. I'm inclined to think that there must be some difference. Even if neither baeocystin and norbaeocystin or their dephosphorylated derivatives have direct psychedelic properties, I find it pretty hard to believe that they would have no pharmacological properties whatsoever, especially considering that they are technically even more similar in structure to serotonin than psilocybin and psilocin are, respectively.
The biggest differences that I have ever heard people describe between pure psilocin and mushrooms as well happens to be that the former is much more lucid and controllable, and possibly more visual as well. I cannot speak for this last part, but I can say that every synthetic 4-substituted tryptamine that I've tried, including some like 4-HO-MET which are pretty darn close in structure to psilocin, has been remarkably lucid and manageable, while mushrooms on the other hand have consistently given me the most powerful mind warping of any psychedelic I've used. This just gives me more reason to think that the two experiences might indeed be quite different.
Of course, this question will never be truly answered for myself until I have the chance to weigh the two types of trips myself, but it doesn't hurt to ask for outside opinions as well, right? So, have you ever gotten to try psilocin by itself?