- Merits
- 42
Enoon
I can't fault your reasoning, and your pragmatic, nuanced approach to this is admirable. Certainly, as Endlessness says, it is useful to have respect for the power (both positive and negative) that entities can have on you... whether you consider the entities psychological shadows and archetypes or believe them to be sentient beings.
You will note, though, that this is not a debate between the polarities as you described. No one here is even arguing for the 100% all-in-your-head approach. There is the JLL thread where he proposes that entities are mere Brownian motion with our consciousness projecting whatever we project onto them... but no one on that thread has even come close to agreeing with him.
What we have is people like yourself and Endlessness arguing either that it doesn't matter if they are real, or that they seem to be related to one's psychological state... and me.
My stance that they are "real" in the objective sense and sentient does not preclude them also being in your mind or reflective of your psychological state. Naturally, all of you could also be in my mind. I could be Vishnu dreaming this world... but the fact that you are sentient shows. Your minds work in different ways from my own and you have different skill sets as well as access to information that I may not. This sense of dealing with a conscious, intelligent entity is magnified 10,000% when dealing with entities. If I were to judge entities to not be independently sentient, then you all here would certainly not qualify.
Let us play a game of analogy and flip the script so you can see where I am coming from.
Imagine that we are in a backpacker's hotel somewhere in Asia. Imagine also that a new case of a SARS outbreak is being discussed vehemently in the common room. Let us say that the fellow travelers here fall into a handful of categories in their relation to this.
1) We have a couple full-on spiritualists who don't believe in the material world at all, and are completely unconcerned about the subjective appearance of what people are calling a SARS outbreak. They propose to go about their business as usual.
2) We have some spiritual skeptics who doubt the material world, but not enough to bet their health on it. They propose to be better safe than sorry, and accept the paper facemasks being handed out, though they really believe them unnecessary.
3) We have some rational materialists who are skeptical about the event, but for purely rational reasons, as they are conspiracy theorists. These folks fall into two camps. Those who believe the epidemic is made up for a variety of plausible reasons, and that there is no threat. And those who believe the outbreak is real, manufactured by (insert boogeyman here) for equally plausible reasons. A majority of these type take the facemasks, because even the disbelievers are generally not so sure of themselves to take the risk of walking the subways on faith.
4) We have your bulk of the group. Worldly, educated people who believe in science and tend to trust whoever is the expert in subject. They may have no evidence or experience of the subject, but they have a basic understanding of the underlying aspects like physiology and immunology. They may be a bit skeptical, but are inclined to accept scientific pronouncements on faith. They all take the masks.
5) We have a scientist who happens to be here in the city expressly to deal with the SARS outbreak. He is on the front lines of viral epidemics, and he is the one handing out facemasks. He even has a case of Tamiflu he is offering to share with his fellow hotel mates.
Now, assuming his credentials check out... guy in group 5 is an expert. Everyone else's opinions on the matter are relatively less valuable from the materialist perspective. Most of the people will follow his lead on principle... even those who doubt the outbreak or even the entire material world. Thus, a majority of the people in the hotel will wind up wearing their facemasks as they make their way to the airport or train station or whatever.
The people in group 1 and group 3 who have absolute certainty that they are in no danger of getting SARS (either because it doesn't exist or the outbreak is a hoax) are the only control group.
Now, in practice... the people who are absolutely certain tend to get what they expect. Meaning that the people in group 1 wind up not getting SARS due to mind over matter. The expert is generally prepared and will not have problems either. Everyone else (the unsure and semi-sure) are the ones who wind up coming down with symptoms.
The question is... are the people who get sick imagining their illness and manifesting it psychosomatically? Is there an objectively real outbreak of SARS to contend with?
Now recognize that in this example one must flip it entirely to reach our current situation. The spiritualists in the example represent the materialists in this situation and vice versa. This is because we are dealing with a non-material phenomenon. Thus the expert here is the person with the most non-material experience.
For those who aren't experts, it makes sense to wear the facemask whatever you believe... as Enoon and Endlessness suggest. Better safe than sorry. It is a fairly easy thing to do, and can't hurt anyway. However, the real question is:
How many people will go ahead and take the Tamiflu. Here we have the crux of where your true beliefs do matter. One will only go ahead and take the Tamiflu if one is really convinced the threat is real.
To return to our discussion in full, one has to be convinced enough to take the red pill in order to get to the reality of the situation. As long as you doubt the entities, they are unlikely to give you the good dope... and you are unlikely to remember much of what you do experience with them. This is for the same reason that people who are unsure of the validity and reality of their dreams tend to remember much less of their dream lives than people who take it seriously. The Senoi people base their entire lives around dreaming and as a result, even the small children have extraordinary recall and lucid dreaming abilities.
To apply this all to entities and bring it back full circle, you may find yourself to be respectful in your dealings with entities... you may take adequate precautions and treat them as if they could be real just in case... but it is not just about you. If the entities are real (if the SARS outbreak was legitimate), then it is not a matter of your belief only. In fact, your experience of the entities will be due to a great extent on their feelings about YOU.
IMO (as an expert on hyperspace), Entities will treat you differently depending on how you think about them. They will not invest the time and energy to become your guides and guardians if you dismiss them as Jungian shadows. They just won't. They have feelings. Not our petty egoic monkey mind feelings... but a definite sense of whether they would be wasting their time or not.
Imagine you walk into a monastery and want to witness what goes on there... having heard astounding tales and being curious. If you come to the grandmaster as a skeptic and fundamentally doubt his power and arts, how likely is he going to be to share wondrous gifts with you? He is, in all truth, likely to slap you around a bit and toss you on your ear. Certainly he will not be taking you into the inner chambers where his senior students are practicing levitation.
I am sorry to harp and make such a long post... but it really DOES matter what you believe. Even if it was all in your head, this would be so. (i.e. the mind over matter of the 1st group) But, it matters in what you do, it matters in how far you are willing to go, it matters on how much you can respect the experience, and all of this makes a HUGE difference on how the entities perceive you.
I don't want to beat a dead horse, but I am convinced that most people who have used spice haven't had (m)any breakthroughs. Of those who have, only a certain percentage have met entities. Of those, only a very small percentage have been able to have useful conversation and telepathic exchange with them. IMHO only those in the last category with enough experience under their belt are even qualified to have an opinion on this.
The majority of entity contact I read about here, and hear from people in person, amounts to people breaking through and being struck dumb by awe and fear... and this sends waves across hyperspace. Nearly immediately, the lowest levels of entities come and rush the person. These being, of course, psychic parasites that feed on fear (for the most part). They come and swarm the new entrant to hyperspace (or other similar planes of existence) and go to town munching up the good stuff. The poor psychonaut is left feeling drained, frightened and violated, with perhaps some memory of the encounter... perhaps not. Often times people go and get soul raped repeatedly in hyperspace (even moreso in Salvia relams) only to come back with no recollection. Perhaps the 10th time it happens, they finally manage to remember what went down and reconnect to some of the missing memories.
Naturally, this situation can be even worse when dealing with the truly demonic entities... rather than the packs of parasites.
So. I am not saying this stuff to puff up my ego. I am honestly making a public service announcement about a very real and present danger that I have a lot of direct experience with. Also, I am saying that if you do figure out what the proper respect is and manage to make some friends over there... there are REAL and tangible benefits to that, both over there and back here.
There you go.
HF
I can't fault your reasoning, and your pragmatic, nuanced approach to this is admirable. Certainly, as Endlessness says, it is useful to have respect for the power (both positive and negative) that entities can have on you... whether you consider the entities psychological shadows and archetypes or believe them to be sentient beings.
You will note, though, that this is not a debate between the polarities as you described. No one here is even arguing for the 100% all-in-your-head approach. There is the JLL thread where he proposes that entities are mere Brownian motion with our consciousness projecting whatever we project onto them... but no one on that thread has even come close to agreeing with him.
What we have is people like yourself and Endlessness arguing either that it doesn't matter if they are real, or that they seem to be related to one's psychological state... and me.
My stance that they are "real" in the objective sense and sentient does not preclude them also being in your mind or reflective of your psychological state. Naturally, all of you could also be in my mind. I could be Vishnu dreaming this world... but the fact that you are sentient shows. Your minds work in different ways from my own and you have different skill sets as well as access to information that I may not. This sense of dealing with a conscious, intelligent entity is magnified 10,000% when dealing with entities. If I were to judge entities to not be independently sentient, then you all here would certainly not qualify.
Let us play a game of analogy and flip the script so you can see where I am coming from.
Imagine that we are in a backpacker's hotel somewhere in Asia. Imagine also that a new case of a SARS outbreak is being discussed vehemently in the common room. Let us say that the fellow travelers here fall into a handful of categories in their relation to this.
1) We have a couple full-on spiritualists who don't believe in the material world at all, and are completely unconcerned about the subjective appearance of what people are calling a SARS outbreak. They propose to go about their business as usual.
2) We have some spiritual skeptics who doubt the material world, but not enough to bet their health on it. They propose to be better safe than sorry, and accept the paper facemasks being handed out, though they really believe them unnecessary.
3) We have some rational materialists who are skeptical about the event, but for purely rational reasons, as they are conspiracy theorists. These folks fall into two camps. Those who believe the epidemic is made up for a variety of plausible reasons, and that there is no threat. And those who believe the outbreak is real, manufactured by (insert boogeyman here) for equally plausible reasons. A majority of these type take the facemasks, because even the disbelievers are generally not so sure of themselves to take the risk of walking the subways on faith.
4) We have your bulk of the group. Worldly, educated people who believe in science and tend to trust whoever is the expert in subject. They may have no evidence or experience of the subject, but they have a basic understanding of the underlying aspects like physiology and immunology. They may be a bit skeptical, but are inclined to accept scientific pronouncements on faith. They all take the masks.
5) We have a scientist who happens to be here in the city expressly to deal with the SARS outbreak. He is on the front lines of viral epidemics, and he is the one handing out facemasks. He even has a case of Tamiflu he is offering to share with his fellow hotel mates.
Now, assuming his credentials check out... guy in group 5 is an expert. Everyone else's opinions on the matter are relatively less valuable from the materialist perspective. Most of the people will follow his lead on principle... even those who doubt the outbreak or even the entire material world. Thus, a majority of the people in the hotel will wind up wearing their facemasks as they make their way to the airport or train station or whatever.
The people in group 1 and group 3 who have absolute certainty that they are in no danger of getting SARS (either because it doesn't exist or the outbreak is a hoax) are the only control group.
Now, in practice... the people who are absolutely certain tend to get what they expect. Meaning that the people in group 1 wind up not getting SARS due to mind over matter. The expert is generally prepared and will not have problems either. Everyone else (the unsure and semi-sure) are the ones who wind up coming down with symptoms.
The question is... are the people who get sick imagining their illness and manifesting it psychosomatically? Is there an objectively real outbreak of SARS to contend with?
Now recognize that in this example one must flip it entirely to reach our current situation. The spiritualists in the example represent the materialists in this situation and vice versa. This is because we are dealing with a non-material phenomenon. Thus the expert here is the person with the most non-material experience.
For those who aren't experts, it makes sense to wear the facemask whatever you believe... as Enoon and Endlessness suggest. Better safe than sorry. It is a fairly easy thing to do, and can't hurt anyway. However, the real question is:
How many people will go ahead and take the Tamiflu. Here we have the crux of where your true beliefs do matter. One will only go ahead and take the Tamiflu if one is really convinced the threat is real.
To return to our discussion in full, one has to be convinced enough to take the red pill in order to get to the reality of the situation. As long as you doubt the entities, they are unlikely to give you the good dope... and you are unlikely to remember much of what you do experience with them. This is for the same reason that people who are unsure of the validity and reality of their dreams tend to remember much less of their dream lives than people who take it seriously. The Senoi people base their entire lives around dreaming and as a result, even the small children have extraordinary recall and lucid dreaming abilities.
To apply this all to entities and bring it back full circle, you may find yourself to be respectful in your dealings with entities... you may take adequate precautions and treat them as if they could be real just in case... but it is not just about you. If the entities are real (if the SARS outbreak was legitimate), then it is not a matter of your belief only. In fact, your experience of the entities will be due to a great extent on their feelings about YOU.
IMO (as an expert on hyperspace), Entities will treat you differently depending on how you think about them. They will not invest the time and energy to become your guides and guardians if you dismiss them as Jungian shadows. They just won't. They have feelings. Not our petty egoic monkey mind feelings... but a definite sense of whether they would be wasting their time or not.
Imagine you walk into a monastery and want to witness what goes on there... having heard astounding tales and being curious. If you come to the grandmaster as a skeptic and fundamentally doubt his power and arts, how likely is he going to be to share wondrous gifts with you? He is, in all truth, likely to slap you around a bit and toss you on your ear. Certainly he will not be taking you into the inner chambers where his senior students are practicing levitation.
I am sorry to harp and make such a long post... but it really DOES matter what you believe. Even if it was all in your head, this would be so. (i.e. the mind over matter of the 1st group) But, it matters in what you do, it matters in how far you are willing to go, it matters on how much you can respect the experience, and all of this makes a HUGE difference on how the entities perceive you.
I don't want to beat a dead horse, but I am convinced that most people who have used spice haven't had (m)any breakthroughs. Of those who have, only a certain percentage have met entities. Of those, only a very small percentage have been able to have useful conversation and telepathic exchange with them. IMHO only those in the last category with enough experience under their belt are even qualified to have an opinion on this.
The majority of entity contact I read about here, and hear from people in person, amounts to people breaking through and being struck dumb by awe and fear... and this sends waves across hyperspace. Nearly immediately, the lowest levels of entities come and rush the person. These being, of course, psychic parasites that feed on fear (for the most part). They come and swarm the new entrant to hyperspace (or other similar planes of existence) and go to town munching up the good stuff. The poor psychonaut is left feeling drained, frightened and violated, with perhaps some memory of the encounter... perhaps not. Often times people go and get soul raped repeatedly in hyperspace (even moreso in Salvia relams) only to come back with no recollection. Perhaps the 10th time it happens, they finally manage to remember what went down and reconnect to some of the missing memories.
Naturally, this situation can be even worse when dealing with the truly demonic entities... rather than the packs of parasites.
So. I am not saying this stuff to puff up my ego. I am honestly making a public service announcement about a very real and present danger that I have a lot of direct experience with. Also, I am saying that if you do figure out what the proper respect is and manage to make some friends over there... there are REAL and tangible benefits to that, both over there and back here.
There you go.
HF

..good on you Hyperspace Fool..