polytrip said:
You may see different things each time, but the way in wich you see them is mostly the same everytime.
Things like the hyperspace lexicon show that there are basic features of the DMT experience that virtually anybody who uses DMT has.
Besides that, i've taken psychedelic's with people and when we where talking about the experience, it always seemed that we shared much of the same experiences.
Maybe, within the same room, you influence eachother. But still.
I don’t agree. That hasn’t been my experience.
The visual aspects of many of my DMT experiences is hard to convey, but I’ll try to give some examples. The moments immediately before a breakthrough illustrate the variability I experience:
I never really understood why people describe the visual(s) leading up to a breakthrough as a “chrysanthemum”, because (until recently – I’ll get to that) my pre-breakthrough visuals never look anything like a flower.
Usually, my entire visual field is filled with “something” that resembles a cloud or billowing smoke (in 3D). The surface is much more colorful and extremely detailed, but the overall “texture” is that of smoke (as I’ve previously posted in this thread). As the smoke approaches, I’m able to resolve finer and finer detail. Within a minute or so, the “cloud” reaches me and passes through me. Several things can happen when it passes through, but once it has passed through me, I’m on the “other side”.
Occasionally, the pre-breakthrough visuals resemble 3D “intersecting crystalline spheres”. They also, approach and pass through me in a similar manner.
Sometimes the pre-breakthrough visuals are almost non-existent and have a “zig-zag” static-like quality to them (2D). There is no forward movement, no “passing through”, etc. It’s more like a “fading-in” to hyperspace.
Recently, I had pre-breakthrough visuals that (I think) resembled the classic “chrysanthemum”. My entire field of vision was filled with an incredibly beautiful, kaleidoscopic 3D, geometric pattern. It was what I imagine is often described, but something I had never before experienced.
Now all these varieties of breakthrough are similar in a very general sense: something happens, that something is often visual, and then breakthrough occurs. But looking at the specifics, there’s quite a bit of variability: almost non-visual to intensely colorful and visually detailed, amorphous “clouds” to very regular geometry, movement forward vs. no movement at all, 2D vs. 3D, a sensed intelligent “presence” in the formations or not, etc.
And that’s just the variety in the moments prior to breakthrough. After breakthrough, the variety increases substantially.